do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-545/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Afectados Banco Popular v SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, bond, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice, share








C_2017424EN.01003802.xml










11.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/38





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Afectados Banco Popular v SRB
(Case T-545/17)
(2017/C 424/56)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Afectados Banco Popular (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Ferrer-Bonsoms Millet, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision, declare the transactions carried out under it ineffective and order the return of the property of the Banco Popular Español, S.A. to the shareholders and bond-holders concerned, putting them back in the position they were in before the intervention;










—


If that is not possible, declare in any event that the conversion of the bonds into shares is ineffective, maintaining bond-holders in the same position as they were in on 6 June 2017 and order the payment of compensation to shareholders by payment corresponding to the actual value of the bank and, accordingly, of the shares on 30 June 2016.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case T-525/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Taberna Ángel Sierra and Others v SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2017357EN.01002201.xml










23.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/22





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Taberna Ángel Sierra and Others v SRB
(Case T-525/17)
(2017/C 357/29)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Taberna Ángel Sierra, SL (Madrid, Spain) and 67 other applicants (represented by: P. Rúa Sobrino, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision;










—


Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable;










—


Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action concerns Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 allowing the resolution of the Banco Popular Español, S.A.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case T-526/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Ruiz Jayo and Others v SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2018022EN.01004201.xml










22.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 22/42





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Ruiz Jayo and Others v SRB
(Case T-526/17)
(2018/C 022/58)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: María Concepción Ruiz Jayo (Madrid, Spain) and 3499 other applicants (represented by: S. Rodríguez Bajón, F. Cremades García and M. Ruiz Núñez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


Declare this action for annulment admissible and well founded;










—


Pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 inapplicable or, in the alternative, declare Articles 21, 22(2)(a) and 24 inapplicable, as well as Articles 18 and 23 thereof;










—


Annul the contested SRB Decision;










—


Order SRB to pay compensation to the applicants in respect of harm caused to them by the implementation of rules contrary to EU law;










—


In the alternative, order SRB to pay compensation to the applicants, as shareholders and creditors, based on the consideration that the Banco Popular’s valuation presented by the applicants is the final valuation under Regulation No 806/2014 in order to determine whether shareholders and creditors would have received better treatment had the institution under resolution initiated ordinary insolvency proceedings;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action concerns the Decision of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 (SRB/EES/2017/08) allowing the resolution of the Banco Popular Español, S.A.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case C-470/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Teresa Coria Garcia and Others v Austrian Airlines AG
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, indemnification








C_2018022EN.01001701.xml










22.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 22/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Teresa Coria Garcia and Others v Austrian Airlines AG
(Case C-470/17)
(2018/C 022/23)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Handelsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Teresa Coria Garcia, Marina Velasco Coria, Miriam Coria Garcia

Defendant: Austrian Airlines AG
The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 25 October 2017.
Case C-471/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, pasta, specification of tariff heading








C_2017374EN.01001501.xml










6.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
(Case C-471/17)
(2017/C 374/20)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover

Question referred

Are fried noodles ‘dried’ pasta within the meaning of CN subheading 1902 3010? (1)



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1450 of 7 August 2017 establishing a temporary prohibition of fishing for ling in area IIIa; Union waters of IIIbcd by vessels flying the flag of Denmark
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Denmark, EU waters, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2017208EN.01000701.xml










11.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 208/7








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/1450
of 7 August 2017
         
establishing a temporary prohibition of fishing for ling in area IIIa; Union waters of IIIbcd by vessels flying the flag of Denmark


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) 2017/127 (2) lays down quotas for 2017.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2017.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2017 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 August 2017.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

João AGUIAR MACHADO
            

Director-General


Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) 2017/127 of 20 January 2017 fixing for 2017 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2017, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


10/TQ127




Member State


Denmark




Stock


LIN/3A/BCD




Species


Ling (Molva molva)




Zone


IIIa; Union waters of IIIbcd




Closing date


1.7.2017
Case T-528/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Ballesté Torralba and Others v SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2017424EN.01003702.xml










11.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/37





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Ballesté Torralba and Others v SRB
(Case T-528/17)
(2017/C 424/54)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: María Ballesté Torralba (Alcarrás, Spain), David Lozano Jiménez (Alcarrás), María Carmen Estruch Martínez (Alcarrás) and Ramón Ribes Jové (Alcarrás) (represented by: E. Silva Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017, with effect ex tunc, thereby rendering it invalid and devoid of effects;










—


Order the payment of compensation in the sum of EUR 37 877 to applicants 1, in the sum of EUR 11 000 to applicants 2, and in the sum of EUR 1 309,14 to Ms María Ballesté Torralba.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case T-501/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Mutualidad Complementaria de Previsión Social Renault España v Commission and SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2017338EN.01001601.xml










9.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/16





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Mutualidad Complementaria de Previsión Social Renault España v Commission and SRB
(Case T-501/17)
(2017/C 338/17)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Mutualidad Complementaria de Previsión Social Renault España (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Solana López, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the court should:






—


declare that EU law has been infringed by the SRB in Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 adopted at the executive session of 7 June 2017 and in which it adopted the resolution scheme regarding the financial institution Banco Popular Español, S.A.;










—


consequently, annul that measure and, in addition, the consequential implementing measures that the SRB was able to take, all with retroactive effect.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán y Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Alvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case T-502/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — SFP Asset Management and Others v SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2017347EN.01003601.xml










16.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/36





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — SFP Asset Management and Others v SRB
(Case T-502/17)
(2017/C 347/45)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: SFP Asset management and Others (Geneva, Switzerland), Twenty First Trade Inc. (Panama, Panama), Merlos Infor, S.L. (Badalona, Spain) (represented by: J. Gálvez Pascual, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


declare that, by adopting in its executive session of 7 June 2017 Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 establishing the resolution scheme in respect of the financial institution Banco Popular Español S.A., the Single Resolution Board (‘the SRB’) infringed EU law;










—


consequently, annul that measure, and any subsequent implementing measures too that the SRB may have adopted, with effect ex tunc.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case T-511/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Corra González and Others v SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2017357EN.01001902.xml










23.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/19





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Corra González and Others v SRB
(Case T-511/17)
(2017/C 357/25)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: José María Francisco Corra González (Madrid, Spain) and seven other applicants (represented by: C. de Santiago Álvarez and J. Redondo Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


declare that, by adopting in its executive session of 7 June 2017 Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 establishing the resolution scheme in respect of the financial institution Banco Popular Español S.A., the Single Resolution Board (‘the SRB’) infringed EU law;










—


consequently, annul that measure, and any subsequent implementing measures too that the SRB may have adopted, with effect ex tunc.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Case T-523/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Eleveté Invest Group and Others v Commission and SRB
Date: 2017-08-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_2017374EN.01003801.xml










6.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/38





Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Eleveté Invest Group and Others v Commission and SRB
(Case T-523/17)
(2017/C 374/57)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Eleveté Invest Group S.L. (Madrid, Spain) and 19 other applicants (represented by: B. Cremades Román, F. Orts Castro, J. López Useros, S. Cajal Martín and P. Marrodán Lázaro, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246, both adopted on 7 June 2017;










—


Order SRB and the European Commission to pay damages to the applicants on grounds of non-contractual liability;










—


Declare the invalidity of the valuation carried out by SRB’s independent expert and, following the calculation of the net value of the assets of Banco Popular, order SRB and the European Commission to pay compensation to the applicants;










—


Order SRB and the European Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.