do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8470 — DAAM/InfraVia/FIH/AI) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: airport, banking, economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2017240EN.01000101.xml










25.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8470 — DAAM/InfraVia/FIH/AI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 240/01)
On 6 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8470. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-461/17: Action brought on 25 July 2017 — TN v ENISA
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, data protection, indemnification, personal data, promotion, right to justice, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_2017347EN.01003101.xml










16.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/31





Action brought on 25 July 2017 — TN v ENISA
(Case T-461/17)
(2017/C 347/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: TN (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul ENISA’s decision of 25 November 2016, withdrawing its offer of employment, according to which the applicant was to be appointed to the position of head of the corporate services and stakeholder relations unit;










—


annul ENISA’s decision of 20 April 2017, rejecting the applicant’s complaint;










—


award the applicant damages for the material and non-material damage suffered;










—


order ENISA to bear the entire costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed its contractual obligations vis-à-vis the applicant.






—


The applicant alleges that the offer could not be withdrawn as a contract had already been concluded and it contests the defendant’s arguments to the contrary.














2.


Second plea in law, alleging undue treatment of the applicant’s personal data and infringement of Article 12 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Union, of the duty of care, and of the right to good administration.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard.






—


The applicant was not heard before the contested decision to withdraw the offer of employment was taken.
Information concerning the entry into force of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EAEC, Ukraine, association agreement (EU)








L_2017193EN.01000101.xml










25.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 193/1







Information concerning the entry into force of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part

The Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 21 March 2014 and 27 June 2014
          (1), enters into force on 1 September 2017, in accordance with Article 486(2) of the Agreement, as the last instrument of ratification or approval was deposited on 11 July 2017.


(1)  
            OJ L 161, 29.5.2014, p. 3.
Case T-463/17: Action brought on 25 July 2017 — Raise Conseil v EUIPO — Raizers (RAISE)
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, financial management, financial market, financial services, investment company, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017330EN.01001102.xml










2.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/11





Action brought on 25 July 2017 — Raise Conseil v EUIPO — Raizers (RAISE)
(Case T-463/17)
(2017/C 330/14)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Raise Conseil (Paris, France) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Raizers (Paris)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘RAISE’ — European Union trade mark No 11 508 967

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017 in Case R 1606/2016-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision to the extent that it declared invalid EU trade mark RAISE No 11 508 967 for lack of distinctiveness within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR in relation to the following services in Class 36: ‘Financial affairs; financial information; financial management; financing services; financial analysis; mutual funds and capital investments; financial consultancy; financial sponsorship; financing (loan) business; financial evaluation (insurance, banking, real estate); setting up and investment of funds; factoring; issue of tokens of value; stock exchange quotations; securities brokerage; monetary affairs; exchanging money; fiscal valuations and assessments; real estate affairs; insurance; provident fund services; direct banking; issuing of travellers’ cheques or credit cards; real estate appraisal; real estate management’;










—


order the company Raizers, applicant in the action for a declaration of invalidity, to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the company Raise Conseil, including representation expenses.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2017240EN.01000201.xml










25.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

24 July 2017
(2017/C 240/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1648 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,09 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4361 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89350 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5883 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1020 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3525 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,024 




HUF


Hungarian forint


305,15 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2408 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5638 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,1378 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4661 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4584 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0931 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5657 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5859 




KRW


South Korean won


1 299,12 




ZAR


South African rand


15,0916 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8622 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4098 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 516,30 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9848 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,001 




RUB


Russian rouble


69,8567 




THB


Thai baht


38,893 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,6543 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,5982 




INR


Indian rupee


75,0105 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8556 — Carlyle/GTCR/Albany Molecular Research) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, investment company, mass media, merger control, organisation of health care, pharmaceutical industry, research body, technology, telecommunications








C_2017240EN.01001301.xml










25.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/13





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8556 — Carlyle/GTCR/Albany Molecular Research)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 240/07)






1.


On 17 July 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which The Carlyle Group (‘Carlyle’, United States) and GTCR LLC (‘GTCR’, United States) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (‘AMRI’, United States) by way of a purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Carlyle: global alternative asset manager, which manages funds that invest globally across four investment disciplines: corporate private equity; real assets; global market strategies; and solutions,
—   for GTCR: private equity firm founded focused on investing in growth companies in the financial services and technology, healthcare, technology, media and telecommunications and growth business services industries,
—   for AMRI: global contract research and manufacturing organization providing customers integrated drug discovery, development, and manufacturing services.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8556 — Carlyle/GTCR/Albany Molecular Research, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8534 — Bouygues Immobilier/Accor/Nextdoor) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: business lease, economic concentration, hotel industry, merger control, property development








C_2017240EN.01000102.xml










25.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8534 — Bouygues Immobilier/Accor/Nextdoor)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 240/02)
On 19 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8534. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.