do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8551 — Advent International/Faerch Plast Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, packaging, plastics industry








C_2017233EN.01000601.xml










19.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/6





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8551 — Advent International/Faerch Plast Group)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 233/04)






1.


On 10 July 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Advent International (United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Færch Plast Group A/S (Denmark) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for undertaking Advent International: private equity investment,
—   for undertaking Færch Plast Group A/S: manufacturing of plastic trays for food packaging.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8551 — Advent International/Faerch Plast Group, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-663/16 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 July 2017 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH, Ecolab Deutschland GmbH v European Chemicals Agency (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance)
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical product, market approval, marketing standard, supplier








C_2017300EN.01000901.xml










11.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 300/9





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 July 2017 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH, Ecolab Deutschland GmbH v European Chemicals Agency
(Case C-663/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Making available on the market and use of biocidal products - Article 95 - European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) - Publication of a list of active substances - Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance))
(2017/C 300/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH, Ecolab Deutschland GmbH (represented by: M. Grunchard and K. Van Maldegem, avocats, and P. Sellar, Advocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä and C. Buchanan, Agents, and P. Oliver, Barrister)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH and Ecolab Deutschland GmbH shall pay the costs.










3.


Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH, Ecolab Deutschland GmbH, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), BASF SE and Oxea GmbH shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.
Case C-437/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19 July 2017 — Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH v EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, equal treatment, free movement of workers, paid leave, seniority








C_2017382EN.01002801.xml










13.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 382/28





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19 July 2017 — Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH v EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH
(Case C-437/17)
(2017/C 382/34)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH

Defendant: EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH

Question referred

Are Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (1) on freedom of movement for workers to be interpreted as precluding a national provision such as that in the main proceedings (Paragraph 3(2)(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 3(3) and Paragraph 2(1) of the Urlaubsgesetz (Law on holidays, ‘the UrlG’)), under which a worker who has a total of 25 years of service, but has not completed these with the same Austrian employer, is entitled to only five weeks of annual holiday, whereas a worker who has completed 25 years of service with the same Austrian employer is entitled to six weeks of holiday per year.


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.
Case T-742/15 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — DD v FRA (Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract of indefinite duration — Disciplinary penalty — Reprimand — Termination of contract — Right to be heard — Non-material harm)
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative sanction, disciplinary proceedings, indemnification, rights of the defence, servant (EU), termination of employment, work contract








C_2017283EN.01003601.xml










28.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/36





Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — DD v FRA
(Case T-742/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Disciplinary penalty - Reprimand - Termination of contract - Right to be heard - Non-material harm))
(2017/C 283/53)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: DD (represented: initially, by L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche and, subsequently, by L. Levi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 October 2015, DD v FRA (F-106/13 and F-25/14, EU:F:2015:118), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders DD to bear his own costs;










3.


Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/975 of 8 June 2017 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (OJ L 146, 9.6.2017)
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: North Korea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








L_2017186EN.01001701.xml










19.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 186/17







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/975 of 8 June 2017 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 146 of 9 June 2017
)


On page 145, concluding formula:
for:


                        ‘Done at Brussels, 8 June 2017.


For the Council


The President

L. GRECH
                        ’,


read:


                        ‘Done at Luxembourg, 8 June 2017.


For the Council


The President

K. SIMSON
                        ’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8495 — Cummins/Eaton Corporation/Eaton JV business) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: commercial vehicle, economic concentration, engine, merger control, vehicle parts








C_2017233EN.01000101.xml










19.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8495 — Cummins/Eaton Corporation/Eaton JV business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 233/01)
On 4 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8495. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-423/16: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — De Masi v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the work of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’ set up by the Council — Response to initial requests after an equitable arrangement — No confirmatory decision — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2017-07-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, admissibility, code of conduct, fiscal policy








C_2017293EN.01003202.xml










4.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 293/32





Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — De Masi v Commission
(Case T-423/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the work of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’ set up by the Council - Response to initial requests after an equitable arrangement - No confirmatory decision - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 293/38)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Fabio De Masi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fischer-Lescano, Professor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Baquero Cruz and F. Erlbacher, then J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the Commission’s decisions allegedly contained, first, in the letter of 20 May 2016, and second, in the letter of 13 July 2016, responding to the requests for access to the documents of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’, submitted by the applicant on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order







1)


The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.










2)


Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.