do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-38/17: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — DQ and Others v Parliament
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition (EU), corruption, damages, legal expenses, psychological harassment, sexual harassment, working conditions








C_2017293EN.01004003.xml










4.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 293/40





Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — DQ and Others v Parliament
(Case T-38/17) (1)

(2017/C 293/52)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1340 of 17 July 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, UNO, economic sanctions, international sanctions, peacekeeping, trade restriction








L_2017185EN.01005501.xml










18.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 185/55








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/1340
of 17 July 2017
         
amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP of 20 December 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and repealing Common Position 2008/369/CFSP (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 20 December 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/788/CFSP.












(2)


On 21 June 2017, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 2360 (2017), which amends the listing criteria governing UN restrictive measures.












(3)


Further Union action is needed in order to implement certain measures.












(4)


Decision 2010/788/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Article 3(1) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, point (i) is replaced by the following:







‘(i)


planning, directing, sponsoring or participating in attacks against MONUSCO peacekeepers or United Nations personnel, including members of the Group of Experts;’.







Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 17 July 2017.


For the Council


The President

F. MOGHERINI
            





(1)  
            OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30.
Case C-432/17: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 17 July 2017 — Dermod Patrick O'Brien v Ministry of Justice (Formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs)
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, full-time employment, part-time employment, retirement conditions








C_2017318EN.01000901.xml










25.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/9





Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 17 July 2017 — Dermod Patrick O'Brien v Ministry of Justice (Formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs)
(Case C-432/17)
(2017/C 318/14)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Dermod Patrick O'Brien

Defendant: Ministry of Justice (Formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs)

Questions referred

Does Directive 97/81 (1), and in particular clause 4 of the Framework Agreement annexed thereto concerning the principle of nondiscrimination, require that periods of service prior to the deadline for transposing the Directive should be taken into account when calculating the amount of the retirement pension of a part-time worker, if they would be taken into account when calculating the pension of a comparable full-time worker?


(1)  Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC — Annex: Framework agreement on part-time work (OJ 1998, L 14, p. 9)
Case T-88/15: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a radiator grille)
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, maintenance, motor vehicle, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_2017293EN.01004002.xml










4.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 293/40





Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a radiator grille)
(Case T-88/15) (1)

(2017/C 293/51)
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Case C-430/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 17 July 2017 — Walbusch Walter Busch GmbH & Co. KG v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: advertising, consumer information, contract terms, termination of a contract








C_2017347EN.01000901.xml










16.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/9





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 17 July 2017 — Walbusch Walter Busch GmbH & Co. KG v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV
(Case C-430/17)
(2017/C 347/09)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Walbusch Walter Busch GmbH & Co. KG

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV

Questions referred







1.


For the purposes of applying Article 8(4) of Directive 2011/83/EU, (1) does the answer to the question whether a means of distance communication (in this instance, an advertising leaflet containing a mail order coupon) allows limited space or time to display information depend on whether






(a)


(in the abstract) the means of distance communication allows only limited space or time by its very nature
or










(b)


(in the particular case) it offers limited space or time in the design selected for it by the trader?














2.


Is it compatible with Article 8(4) and Article 6(1)(h) of Directive 2011/83/EU for information on the right of withdrawal to be restricted to an indication of the existence of a right of withdrawal, in the case, as provided for in Article 8(4) of Directive 2011/83/EU, where there is limited scope for displaying that information?










3.


Do Article 8(4) and Article 6(1)(h) of Directive 2011/83/EU make it a mandatory requirement in all cases, including in the case where there is limited scope for displaying information, for the model withdrawal form set out in Annex I(B) to Directive 2011/83/EU to be attached to the means of distance communication before a distance contract is concluded?






(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8416 — The Priceline Group/Momondo Group Holdings) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic commerce, merger control, search engine, travel agency








C_2018233EN.01000301.xml










4.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8416 — The Priceline Group/Momondo Group Holdings)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 233/02)
On 17 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8416. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-431/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 17 July 2017 — Monachos Eirinaios (Brother Eirinaios), lay name Antonios Giakoumakis v Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Greece, church, clergy, equivalence of diplomas, freedom to provide services, lawyer, professional society, right of establishment








C_2017309EN.01003001.xml










18.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 309/30





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 17 July 2017 — Monachos Eirinaios (Brother Eirinaios), lay name Antonios Giakoumakis v Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon
(Case C-431/17)
(2017/C 309/40)
Language of the case: Greece

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Monachos Eirinaios (Brother Eirinaios), lay name Antonios Giakoumakis

Defendant: Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon

Question referred

Is Article 3 of Directive 98/5/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the registration of a monk of the Church of Greece as a lawyer, with the competent authority of a Member State other than that in which he obtained his professional qualification, in order for him to practise there under his home-country professional title, may be prohibited by the national legislature on the ground that monks of the Church of Greece cannot, under national law, be entered in the registers of bar associations since, on account of that status possessed by them, they do not provide certain guarantees necessary for practice as a lawyer?


(1)  Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained (OJ 1998 L 77, p. 36).
Case T-86/15: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle)
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cold store, graphic illustration, maintenance, motor vehicle, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_2017293EN.01004001.xml










4.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 293/40





Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle)
(Case T-86/15) (1)

(2017/C 293/50)
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Case T-438/17: Action brought on 17 July 2017 — The Scotch Whisky Association v EUIPO — José Estévez (JOHN COR)
Date: 2017-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017309EN.01003401.xml










18.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 309/34





Action brought on 17 July 2017 — The Scotch Whisky Association v EUIPO — José Estévez (JOHN COR)
(Case T-438/17)
(2017/C 309/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: The Scotch Whisky Association (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Rodríguez Domínguez and J. Gracia Albero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: José Estévez, SA (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘JOHN COR’ — European Union trade mark No 10 965 937

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 May 2017 in Case R 1289/2016-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.










—


Infringement of Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.