do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-221/15: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Arbuzov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list — Principle of sound administration — Rights of defence — Duty to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property)
Date: 2017-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, right to justice, rights of the defence, territorial dispute, territorial law, trade restriction








C_2017277EN.01003301.xml










21.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 277/33





Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Arbuzov v Council
(Case T-221/15) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Retention of the applicant’s name on the list - Principle of sound administration - Rights of defence - Duty to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property))
(2017/C 277/48)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicant: Sergej Arbuzov (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Machytková and V. Fišar, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of (i) Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/364 of 5 March 2015 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2015 L 62, p. 25), (ii) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357 of 5 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2015 L 62, p. 1), (iii) Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/318 of 4 March 2016 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2016 L 60, p. 76) and (iv) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/311 of 4 March 2016 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2016 L 60, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Sergej Arbuzov to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 138/2017 of 7 July 2017 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/745]
Date: 2017-07-07
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: EC conformity marking, European Economic Area, international standard, marine pollution, maritime safety, revision of an agreement, safety standard, technical standard, vehicle parts, vessel




L_2019128EN.01003401.xml










16.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 128/34








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 138/2017
of 7 July 2017
         
amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/745]


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 indicating design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following point is inserted after point 2 (Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:






‘3.



32017 R 0306: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 indicating design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment (OJ L 48, 24.2.2017, p. 1).’






Article 2
The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 7 July 2017.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Sabine MONAUNI
            





(1)  
            OJ L 48, 24.2.2017, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.
Corrigendum to the information about the session of the European Economic and Social Committee that adopted the documents published in the Official Journal C 209 of 30 June 2017 (OJ C 209, 30.6.2017)
Date: 2017-07-07
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: ESC opinion, EU Official Journal, European Economic and Social Committee








C_2017218EN.01002401.xml










7.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 218/24





Corrigendum to the information about the session of the European Economic and Social Committee that adopted the documents published in the 
Official Journal C 209 of 30 June 2017


(
Official Journal of the European Union C 209 of 30 June 2017
)
(2017/C 218/14)
On the first page of the cover, under the heading ‘I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions’:

for:


‘523th EESC plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2017’,


read:


‘524th EESC plenary session of 29 and 30 March 2017’.

On the first page of the cover, under the heading ‘III Preparatory acts’:

for:


‘523th EESC plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2017’,


read:


‘524th EESC plenary session of 29 and 30 March 2017’.

On page 1:

for:


‘523TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 22 AND 23 FEBRUARY 2017’,


read:


‘524TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 29 AND 30 MARCH 2017’.

On page 15:

for:


‘523TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 22 AND 23 FEBRUARY 2017’,


read:


‘524TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 29 AND 30 MARCH 2017’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8439 — Wärtsilä/CSSC/JV) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-07-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aerospace industry, building industry, economic concentration, energy production, merger control, petrochemicals, shipbuilding








C_2017218EN.01001701.xml










7.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 218/17





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8439 — Wärtsilä/CSSC/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 218/07)
On 30 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8439. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-359/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Axel Springer v EUIPO — Stiftung Warentest (TestBild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU word mark TestBild — Earlier national figurative marks test — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Inherent distinctive character — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2017-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, audiovisual programme, broadcasting, information technology industry, registered trade mark, television, trade-mark law








C_2017277EN.01004101.xml










21.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 277/41





Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Axel Springer v EUIPO — Stiftung Warentest (TestBild)
(Case T-359/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU word mark TestBild - Earlier national figurative marks test - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Inherent distinctive character - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 277/60)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Axel Springer SE (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: K. Hamacher and G. Müllejans, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Stiftung Warentest (Berlin) (represented: initially by R. Mann, J. Smid, T. Brach, H. Nieland and A.-K. Kornrumpf and subsequently by J. Smid, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 May 2016 (Case R 555/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Stiftung Warentest and Axel Springer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 May 2016 (Case R 555/2015-4), in so far as it found that there was a likelihood of confusion in respect of ‘printed matter, in particular test periodicals, consumer information, prospectuses, catalogues, books, newspapers and periodicals; instructional and teaching material (except apparatus)’, in Class 16 of the Nice Agreement of 15 June 1957 concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the purposes of the Registration of Marks, as revised and amended;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.