do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-398/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 3 July 2017 — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, carbon, cast-iron, common customs tariff, metalworking, piping, specification of tariff heading, tube








C_2017300EN.01002001.xml










11.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 300/20





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 3 July 2017 — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat
(Case C-398/17)
(2017/C 300/25)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Profit Europe NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Questions referred







1.


Must [CN] subheading 7307 19 10 (1) be interpreted as including fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron which have the characteristics of the fittings at issue in the main proceedings, if it appears from their objective characteristics that their material is essentially different from malleable cast iron because the malleability of spheroidal graphite cast iron does not result from appropriate heat treatment and because the graphite in spheroidal graphite cast iron has a different shape to the graphite in malleable cast iron, namely, that of spheroidal graphite instead of temper carbon?










2.


Must [CN] subheading 7307 11 00 1 be interpreted as including fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron which have the characteristics of the fittings at issue in the main proceedings, if the objective characteristics of spheroidal graphite cast iron show that it substantially corresponds to the objective characteristics of non-malleable cast iron?










3.


Must the CN Explanatory Note to subheading 7307 19 10, which provides that malleable cast iron includes spheroidal graphite cast iron, be disregarded to the extent to which it provides that malleable cast iron includes spheroidal graphite cast iron, if it is established that spheroidal graphite cast iron is not malleable cast iron?






(1)  See Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).
Case T-669/16 P: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — De Nicola v EIB (Appeal — EIB staff — Sickness insurance — Refusal to reimburse medical expenses — Laser therapy — Action for annulment and damages)
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, health expenditure, health insurance, indemnification, therapeutics








C_2017283EN.01005002.xml










28.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/50





Order of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-669/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - EIB staff - Sickness insurance - Refusal to reimburse medical expenses - Laser therapy - Action for annulment and damages))
(2017/C 283/78)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2016, De Nicola v EIB (F-82/15, EU:F:2016:166), seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.






(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
Case T-666/16 P: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — De Nicola v EIB (Appeal — EIB staff — Appraisal — Career development report — 2013 staff report — Application for annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee and of the decision not to promote the applicant — Psychological harassment — Claim for damages)
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, indemnification, promotion, psychological harassment, staff assessment








C_2017283EN.01005001.xml










28.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/50





Order of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-666/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career development report - 2013 staff report - Application for annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee and of the decision not to promote the applicant - Psychological harassment - Claim for damages))
(2017/C 283/77)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2016, De Nicola v EIB (F-100/15, EU:F:2016:167), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.






(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
Case C-397/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 3 July 2017 — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, carbon, cast-iron, common customs tariff, metalworking, piping, specification of tariff heading, tube








C_2017300EN.01001902.xml










11.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 300/19





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 3 July 2017 — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat
(Case C-397/17)
(2017/C 300/24)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Profit Europe NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Questions referred







1.


Must [CN] subheading 7307 19 10 (1) be interpreted as including fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron which have the characteristics of the fittings at issue in the main proceedings, if it appears from their objective characteristics that their material is essentially different from malleable cast iron because the malleability of spheroidal graphite cast iron does not result from appropriate heat treatment and because the graphite in spheroidal graphite cast iron has a different shape to the graphite in malleable cast iron, namely, that of spheroidal graphite instead of temper carbon?










2.


Must [CN] subheading 7307 11 00 1 be interpreted as including fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron which have the characteristics of the fittings at issue in the main proceedings, if the objective characteristics of spheroidal graphite cast iron show that it substantially corresponds to the objective characteristics of non-malleable cast iron?










3.


Must the CN Explanatory Note to subheading 7307 19 10, which provides that malleable cast iron includes spheroidal graphite cast iron, be disregarded to the extent to which it provides that malleable cast iron includes spheroidal graphite cast iron, if it is established that spheroidal graphite cast iron is not malleable cast iron?






(1)  See Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).
Case T-416/17: Action brought on 03 July 2017 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino)
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cheese, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017277EN.01005302.xml










21.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 277/53





Action brought on 03 July 2017 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino)
(Case T-416/17)
(2017/C 277/77)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Papouis Dairies LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colour containing the word element ‘fino’ — Application for registration No 11 180 791

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 in Case R 2759/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-414/17: Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: company in difficulties, credit institution, financial instrument, financial legislation, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_2017277EN.01005301.xml










21.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 277/53





Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB
(Case T-414/17)
(2017/C 277/76)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)

Defendant: Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05)’), and in any event to the extent that that decision concerns the applicant; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of incomplete notification of the decision










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the decision
Case T-117/17 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — Proximus v Council (Interim measures — Public procurement — Negotiated procedure — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU law, award of contract, invitation to tender








C_2017369EN.01001902.xml










30.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 369/19





Order of the President of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — Proximus v Council
(Case T-117/17 R)
((Interim measures - Public procurement - Negotiated procedure - Application for interim measures - No urgency))
(2017/C 369/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Proximus SA/NV (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Schutyser, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jaume and S. Cholakova, acting as Agents, and by P. de Bandt, P. Teerlinck and M. Gherghinaru, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures, (i), suspending implementation of the decision of the Council to award the framework contract to another tenderer and, (ii), suspending the implementation of the framework contract concluded between the Council and the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Greece, Mediterranean Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2018232EN.01001401.xml










3.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/14





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2018/C 232/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


11.5.2018




Duration


11.5.2018-31.12.2018




Member State


Greece




Stock or Group of stocks


BFT/AE45WM




Species


Bluefin tuna (Thunnus Thynnus)




Zone


Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


11/TQ120






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1
Case T-417/17: Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese)
Date: 2017-07-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cheese, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017277EN.01005401.xml










21.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 277/54





Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese)
(Case T-417/17)
(2017/C 277/78)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Papouis Dairies LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colour containing the word elements ‘fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese’ — Application for registration No 11 180 791

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 in Case R 2650/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.