do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8525 — Apax Partners/Safety-Kleen) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cleaning industry, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2017182EN.01000501.xml










9.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/5





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8525 — Apax Partners/Safety-Kleen)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 182/04)






1.


On 1 June 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Apax Partners LLP (United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking WP Safety-Kleen (Cayman) Limited (‘Safety-Kleen’, Cayman Islands) by way of a purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Apax Partners LLP: provision of investment advisory services to private equity funds investing primarily in Europe in a range of industry sectors,
—   for Safety-Kleen: provision of industrial parts cleaning machines, related cleaning products/solutions and spent detergent and solvent collection services.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8525 — Apax Partners/Safety-Kleen, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8499 — Goldman Sachs/Caldic) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, distribution business, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2017182EN.01000401.xml










9.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/4





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8499 — Goldman Sachs/Caldic)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 182/03)






1.


On 31 May 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (‘Goldman Sachs’, United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Caldic BV (‘Caldic’, Netherlands) by way of a purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Goldman Sachs: global investment banking, securities and investment management,
—   for Caldic: international full-line distribution of commodity and specialty chemicals to customers in the industrial, health and food industries.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8499 — Goldman Sachs/Caldic, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-826/16: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2017 — Casasnovas Bernad v Commission
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: dismissal, servant (EU), unpaid leave, work contract








C_2017269EN.01003502.xml










14.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/35





Order of the General Court of 9 June 2017 — Casasnovas Bernad v Commission
(Case T-826/16) (1)

(2017/C 269/48)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2017182EN.01000301.xml










9.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 June 2017
(2017/C 182/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1229 




JPY


Japanese yen


123,77 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4383 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86755 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,7885 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0856 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5233 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,268 




HUF


Hungarian forint


308,01 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2065 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5665 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,9865 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4894 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5175 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7551 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5575 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5525 




KRW


South Korean won


1 261,42 




ZAR


South African rand


14,4476 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6332 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4228 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 932,32 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7931 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,624 




RUB


Russian rouble


64,0135 




THB


Thai baht


38,220 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,6852 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,4700 




INR


Indian rupee


72,1365 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-344/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 9 June 2017 — IJDF Italy Srl v Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, jurisdiction, producer's liability, residence, right to justice, unfair terms of contract








C_2017330EN.01000301.xml










2.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 9 June 2017 — IJDF Italy Srl v Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando
(Case C-344/17)
(2017/C 330/04)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: IJDF Italy Srl

Defendants: Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando

Question referred

Must Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) the second sentence of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding a national law that, when cases are related, in particular when there is a guarantee claim related to the original proceedings, provides that the cases are to be determined together before the same court, even though as a result of that provision jurisdiction in respect of the guarantee claim lies with a court other than that within whose jurisdiction the consumer resides or other than that of his address for service?


(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
Case T-368/17: Action brought on 9 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device, electronic equipment








C_2017249EN.01004502.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/45






Action brought on 9 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
(Case T-368/17)
(2017/C 249/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Linak A/S (Nordborg, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design ‘Electrically operated lifting column’ — Community design No 101 159-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 in Case R 1412/2015-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the Applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/907 of 29 May 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ L 139, 30.5.2017)
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, trade restriction








L_2017146EN.01015901.xml










9.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 146/159







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/907 of 29 May 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 139 of 30 May 2017
)


On page 15, Article 2:
for:

‘This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.’,

read:

‘This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.’.
Case T-373/17: Action brought on 9 June 2017 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Fulia Trading (LV BET ZAKŁADY BUKMACHERSKIE)
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, consultancy, gaming, marketing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017256EN.01003701.xml










7.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 256/37





Action brought on 9 June 2017 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Fulia Trading (LV BET ZAKŁADY BUKMACHERSKIE)
(Case T-373/17)
(2017/C 256/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Louis Vuitton Malletier (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fulia Trading Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘LV BET ZAKŁADY BUKMACHERSKIE’ — Application for registration No 13 514 534

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2017 in Case R 1567/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and thus refuse registration to the contested mark;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings;










—


order Fulia to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of legal certainty.
Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ L 139, 30.5.2017)
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Syria, arms control, economic sanctions, international sanctions, trade restriction








L_2017146EN.01015902.xml










9.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 146/159







Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 139 of 30 May 2017
)


On page 62, in Article 3:
for:

‘This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.’,

read:

‘This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.’.
Case T-367/17: Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device, electronic equipment








C_2017249EN.01004501.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/45






Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
(Case T-367/17)
(2017/C 249/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Linak A/S (Nordborg, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design ‘Electrically operated lifting column’ — Community design No 101 159-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 in Case R 1411/2015-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the Applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.
Case C-352/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 9 June 2017 — Petra Dziatkowiak, Thomas Erich Heinz Dziatkowiak v TUIfly GmbH
Date: 2017-06-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2018104EN.01001101.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/11





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 9 June 2017 — Petra Dziatkowiak, Thomas Erich Heinz Dziatkowiak v TUIfly GmbH
(Case C-352/17)
(2018/C 104/12)
Language of the case: German

Referring Court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Petra Dziatkowiak, Thomas Erich Heinz Dziatkowiak

Defendant: TUIfly GmbH
The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 24 November 2017.