do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-411/16 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 June 2017 — Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Research projects financed by the European Union — Seventh Framework programme for research and technological development (2007-2013) — Project eDIGIREGION — Decision of the European Commission to refuse the applicant’s participation — Action for annulment and a declaration of liability)
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, damages, indemnification, innovation, research and development, right to justice, telecommunications








C_2017249EN.01001302.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/13






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 June 2017 — Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v European Commission
(Case C-411/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Research projects financed by the European Union - Seventh Framework programme for research and technological development (2007-2013) - Project eDIGIREGION - Decision of the European Commission to refuse the applicant’s participation - Action for annulment and a declaration of liability))
(2017/C 249/19)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU (represented by: J.J. Marín López, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, acting as Agent, and J. Rivas Andrés, avocat)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8450 — Shanghai Shenda/IAC ST&amp;A Business) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, textile industry, vehicle parts








C_2017179EN.01000101.xml










7.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8450 — Shanghai Shenda/IAC ST&A Business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 179/01)
On 24 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8450. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-339/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2017 — Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V. v Princesport GmbH
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: labelling, product designation, textile product








C_2017283EN.01002301.xml










28.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/23





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2017 — Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V. v Princesport GmbH
(Case C-339/17)
(2017/C 283/32)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V.

Defendant: Princesport GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it is mandatory to clarify that the product is a pure textile product exclusively composed of the same fibre?










2.


Is use of one of the three terms mentioned in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011, namely ‘100 %’, ‘pure’ or ‘all’, mandatory or is this merely an option, and not an obligation, for such products?










3.


Does the obligation under Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 to label a textile product or to mark it with the name and percentage by weight of all constituent fibres also apply to pure textile products coming under Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011?






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 272, p. 1).
Case T-726/15: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2017 — Blaž Jamnik and Blaž v Parliament (Public service contracts — Property market — Tender procedure — Negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice — Premises for the European Union House in Ljubljana — Rejection of the tender after prospecting the local market — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Failure to examine the documents annexed to the tender — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, damages, invitation to tender, tendering








C_2017239EN.01004501.xml










24.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 239/45





Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2017 — Blaž Jamnik and Blaž v Parliament
(Case T-726/15) (1)

((Public service contracts - Property market - Tender procedure - Negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice - Premises for the European Union House in Ljubljana - Rejection of the tender after prospecting the local market - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Failure to examine the documents annexed to the tender - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment))
(2017/C 239/56)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties


Applicants: Jožica Blaž Jamnik and Brina Blaž (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: D. Mihevc, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: V. Naglič, P. López-Carceller and B. Simon, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 12 October 2015 rejecting, after prospection of the local market, the tender submitted by the applicants in connection with building contract INLO.AO-2013-051-LUX-UGIMBI 06 concerning the future European Union House in Ljubljana and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, in the alternative, a claim under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Jožica Blaž Jamnik and Brina Blaž to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.
Case T-359/17: Action brought on 7 June 2017 — Aldo Supermarkets v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (ALDI)
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, registered trade mark, retail outlet, right to justice, supermarket, trade-mark law








C_2017249EN.01004102.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/41






Action brought on 7 June 2017 — Aldo Supermarkets v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (ALDI)
(Case T-359/17)
(2017/C 249/56)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Aldo Supermarkets (Varna, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Saettel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ALDI’ – Application for registration No 12 749 586

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2017 in Case R 976/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Rule 19 of Regulation No 2868/95;










—


Existence of contradictory grounds in that the Board of Appeal accepted, in paragraph 18 of the contested decision, that the opposition form contained a colour representation of the earlier mark, and, in paragraph 24 of the contested decision, that the applicant had produced a PDF file showing the colour representation of the mark, although those comments are incompatible with the finding in paragraphs 22 to 25 of the contested decision that, essentially, the applicant had failed to demonstrate the existence of its earlier mark by not providing a colour representation thereof;










—


Infringement of the rights of the defence and of the principle of audi alteram partem, in that the Board of Appeal noted of its own motion the infringement of Rule 19 of the Implementing Regulation, without hearing the parties on that plea, although the principle of audi alteram partem requires the Boards of Appeal to hear the parties on any plea which they intend to raise of their own motion;










—


Infringement of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Rule 22(3) and (4) of the Implementing Regulation.
Case T-11/16: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2017 — De Masi v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — No confirmatory decision — Request for access on the basis of interinstitutional cooperation under Article 230 TFEU — Documents relating to the work of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’ set up by the Council — Act not amenable to review — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, code of conduct, fiscal policy, interinstitutional cooperation (EU)








C_2017269EN.01001502.xml










14.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/15





Order of the General Court of 7 June 2017 — De Masi v Commission
(Case T-11/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - No confirmatory decision - Request for access on the basis of interinstitutional cooperation under Article 230 TFEU - Documents relating to the work of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’ set up by the Council - Act not amenable to review - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2017/C 269/21)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Fabio De Masi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fischer-Lescano, Professor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, J. Baquero Cruz and A. Buchet, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment, first, of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 9 December 2015 responding to the request for access to the documents of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’, submitted by the applicant on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), and, secondly, of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 9 November 2015 responding to the request for access to the same documents submitted by the Chairman of the European Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs.






(1)  OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
Communication of the European Parliament concerning the European Citizen’s Prize — CIVI EUROPAEO PRAEMIUM
Date: 2017-06-07
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European citizenship, candidate, cultural prize








C_2017226EN.01000201.xml










14.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/2





Communication of the European Parliament concerning the European Citizen’s Prize

CIVI EUROPAEO PRAEMIUM

(2017/C 226/02)
The Chancellery of the European Citizen’s Prize held its annual meeting on 7 June 2017 with Mrs Sylvie Guillaume, Vice-President of the European Parliament, in the chair.
At that meeting the following list of prize winners for 2017 was drawn up.
The prizes will be awarded at public award ceremonies in the Member States where laureates are based, and will be organised by the information offices of the European Parliament. The laureates will also meet at the European Parliament in Brussels for a central event on 11 October 2017.


CIVI EUROPAEO PRAEMIUM




Laureates/Winners








 


Αικατερίνη Παναγοπούλου










 


Αμερίκος Αργυρίου










 


Антони Стоянов










 


Agence de Développement rural Europe et Territoires










 


Border Communities against Brexit










 


Μπορούμε










 


Brexpats — Hear our voice










 


Bürger Europas










 


Buscant Alternatives










 


CERMI (Comité español de representantes de personas con discapacidad)










 


Charita Česká Republika










 


Cristian Pantazi










 


Davide Sousa Moura










 


Don Virginio Rigoldi










 


Ewa Dados










 


Fondazione Opera Immacolata Concezione ONLUS










 


Foróige










 


Għaqda Każini tal-Banda










 


‘Glaskunst langs de Maas’ van Stichting Ecrevissecomité Obbicht










 


Hej främling!










 


Herta Hoffmann










 


Hope for girls










 


Hrvatska udruga Transplant










 


Ján Benčík










 


Junge Aktion der Ackermann-Gemeinde










 


Labdarības maratona ‘Dod Pieci’ komanda










 


Lietuvos moterų lobistinė organizacija










 


Mazowieckie Stowarzyszenie Pracy dla Niepełnosprawnych ‘De Facto’










 


Médecins du monde — Belgique










 


Mihály Bencze










 


Mosaik










 


Mouvement du Nid/Délégation du Bas-Rhin










 


Pescatori siciliani di Mazara del Vallo










 


Plataforma de afectados por Hepatitis C










 


Plataforma de Apoio aos Refugiados










 


PRAKSIS










 


Pulse of Europe










 


Robert Hébras










 


Saint-Omer Cricket Club Stars










 


SámiSoster ry










 


Stowarzyszenie Drogami Tischnera










 


Strom života










 


Students and Refugees Together (START) — Avril Bellinger










 


Széll Tamás










 


Szilárd István










 


Teeme Ära










 


Teresa de Sousa










 


Tvrtko Barun










 


#VORREIPRENDEREILTRENO ONLUS










 


ZDUS — Zveza društev upokojencev Slovenije