do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-366/17: Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Poland v Commission
Date: 2017-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, aid to undertakings, diesel engine, eligibility criteria, financial aid, innovation, motor vehicle industry, terms for aid








C_2017249EN.01004402.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/44






Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Poland v Commission
(Case T-366/17)
(2017/C 249/60)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission of 23 March 2017 (notified under document C(2017) 1904 on 24 March 2017) refusing to make a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund to the major project ‘Starting production of a next-generation diesel engine by Volkswagen Motor Polska’, forming part of the Operational Programme ‘Innovative Economy’ and provided with structural aid within the framework of the ‘Convergence in Poland’ objective;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in its assessment of the project ‘Starting production of a next-generation diesel engine by Volkswagen Motor Polska’ by deciding that, on account of its lack of innovation, that project is not guaranteed to be consistent with the priorities of the Operational Programme ‘Innovative Economy’ (Priority Axis IV of that programme), and that, consequently, it does not meet the requirements of Article 41(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ 2006 L 210, p. 25).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed Article 41(2) of Regulation No 1083/2006 through flagrant contravention of the project assessment deadline.
Case T-364/17: Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Bielawski v EUIPO (HOUSE OF CARS)
Date: 2017-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, auction sale, carriage of goods, general mechanical engineering, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle, vehicle rental








C_2017249EN.01004401.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/44






Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Bielawski v EUIPO (HOUSE OF CARS)
(Case T-364/17)
(2017/C 249/59)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Marcin Bielawski (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘HOUSE OF CARS’ — Application for registration No 15 172 638

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2017 in Case R 2047/2016-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision; or










—


amend the contested decision by finding that there is no absolute ground for refusal in regard to the mark applied for;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-375/17: Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Fenyves v EUIPO (Blue)
Date: 2017-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017256EN.01003801.xml










7.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 256/38





Action brought on 5 June 2017 — Fenyves v EUIPO (Blue)
(Case T-375/17)
(2017/C 256/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Klaudia Patricia Fenyves (Hevesvezekény, Hungary) (represented by: I. Monteiro Alves, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘BLUE’ — Application for registration No 15 287 907

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2017 in Case R 1974/2016-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


remit the trade mark application to the Office for registration to proceed;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.