do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-331/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma (Italy) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Martina Sciotto v Fondazione Teatro dell’Opera di Roma
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: artistic profession, damages, framework agreement, temporary employment, work contract








C_2017309EN.01002601.xml










18.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 309/26





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma (Italy) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Martina Sciotto v Fondazione Teatro dell’Opera di Roma
(Case C-331/17)
(2017/C 309/32)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Martina Sciotto

Respondent: Fondazione Teatro dell’Opera di Roma

Question referred

Are the national rules (in particular under Article 3(6) of Decree-Law No 64 of 30 April 2010, converted into law, with amendments, by Law No 100 of 29 June 2010, in so far as they determine that ‘the provisions of Article 1(01) and (2) of Legislative Decree No 368 of 6 September 2008 shall not apply to the operatic and orchestral foundations’) incompatible with Clause 5 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which appears in the annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC (1) of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP?


(1)  OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43.
Case T-647/16: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2017 — Camerin v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Secondment in the interests of the service — Retirement age — Request for an extension of the secondment — Rejection of the request — Measure not open to challenge — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, Social Democratic Party, retirement conditions, temporary employment








C_2017256EN.01002801.xml










7.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 256/28





Order of the General Court of 1 June 2017 — Camerin v Parliament
(Case T-647/16) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Secondment in the interests of the service - Retirement age - Request for an extension of the secondment - Rejection of the request - Measure not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 256/33)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Laure Camerin (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and M. Ecker, Agents)

Subject matter

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Secretary General of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the Parliament of 1 December 2015 rejecting the request for an extension of the applicant’s secondment beyond 31 December 2015 and seeking annulment of the decision of the President of the Group of 15 June 2016 rejecting her appeal against that earlier decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Ms Laure Camerin shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
Case C-329/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Gerhard Prenninger and Others
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: deforestation, energy supply, environmental impact, environmental monitoring, land use, wooded area








C_2017318EN.01000402.xml










25.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Gerhard Prenninger and Others
(Case C-329/17)
(2017/C 318/06)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Gerhard Prenninger, Karl Helmberger, Franziska Zimmer, Franz Scharinger, Norbert Pühringer, Agrargemeinschaft Pettenbach, Marktgemeinde Vorchdorf, Marktgemeinde Pettenbach, Gemeinde Steinbach am Ziehberg

Question referred

Must Directive 2011/92/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (the EIA Directive) be interpreted as meaning that the ‘clearance of a path’ for the purpose of the construction of a power supply system and for the duration of its lawful existence constitutes ‘deforestation for the purposes of conversion to another type of land use’ within the meaning of point 1(d) of Annex II to the EIA Directive?


(1)  OJ 2012 L 26, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8424 — SGAB/Acciona/SCCN) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: civil engineering, economic concentration, merger control, waste management, water management, water supply








C_2017174EN.01000101.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8424 — SGAB/Acciona/SCCN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 174/01)
On 23 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8424. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control








C_2017174EN.01000301.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

31 May 2017
(2017/C 174/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1221 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,40 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4398 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87365 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,7558 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0896 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4388 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,422 




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,20 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1712 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5655 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,9684 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5054 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5108 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7421 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5789 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5518 




KRW


South Korean won


1 255,01 




ZAR


South African rand


14,7374 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6449 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4135 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 932,91 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8037 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,847 




RUB


Russian rouble


63,7056 




THB


Thai baht


38,230 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,6485 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0559 




INR


Indian rupee


72,3340 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8472 — Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha/Mitsui Osk Lines/Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha/JV) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air transport, carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, economic concentration, maritime transport, merger control








C_2017174EN.01001301.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/13





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8472 — Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha/Mitsui Osk Lines/Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 174/09)






1.


On 19 May 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (‘NYK’), Mitsui Osk Lines (‘MOL’) and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (‘K Line’), all of Japan, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a Joint Venture (‘JV’) by way of a purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for NYK, MOL and K Line: marine transportation globally, including deep-sea container liner shipping services, container terminal services and, to various degrees, other services, including bulk transportation, air cargo transportation, logistics, bulk shipping, real estate, cruise ships, and trading.
—   for JV: the global container liner shipping business and container terminal business (excluding terminals in Japan) of each of NYK, MOL and K Line.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8472 — Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha/Mitsui Osk Lines/Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, self-determination, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_2017174EN.01000201.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/2





Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
(2017/C 174/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Sergey Valeryevich AKSYONOV (no. 1), Mr Rustam Ilmirovich TEMIRGALIEV (no. 3), Mr Aleksandr Viktorovich GALKIN (no. 21), Mr Andriy Yevhenovych PURHIN (no. 45), Mr Sergey Gennadevich TSYPLAKOV (no. 47), Mr Roman Viktorovich LYAGIN (no. 58), Mr Aleksey Vyacheslavovich KARYAKIN (no. 68), Mr Mikhail Efimovich FRADKOV (no. 73), Mr Vladimir ANTYUFEYEV (no. 87), Mr Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich ORLOV (no. 131), Mr Eduard Aleksandrovich BASURIN (no. 137), Mr Evgeny Vladimirovich MANUILOV (no. 143), Mr Anatoly Ivanovich ANTONOV (no. 147), Azov distillery plant (entity listed under no. 17), Federal state budget enterprise for science and research ‘Pan Russian national scientific research institute for wine growing and wine making “Magarach” Russian Academy of Science, formerly known as State Unitary Enterprise of the “Republic of Crimea” National Institute of Wine “Magarach”’ (entity listed under no. 19), Russian National Commercial Bank (no. 23), Sparta battalion (no. 30) and Somali battalion (no. 31), appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons and entities with new statements of reasons. Those persons and entities are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 16 June 2017, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The persons and entities concerned may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include and maintain them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above.


(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 June 2017 on the draft Council decision establishing a Multiannual Framework for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018–2022 (14423/2016 — C8-0528/2016 — 2016/0204(APP))
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, European Parliament
Subjects: EU competence, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, anti-discriminatory measure, fundamental rights, human rights, judicial cooperation, operation of the Institutions, right to justice, social integration








C_2018307EN.01022101.xml










30.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/221






P8_TA(2017)0238
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 June 2017 on the draft Council decision establishing a Multiannual Framework for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018–2022 (14423/2016 — C8-0528/2016 — 2016/0204(APP))
(Special legislative procedure — consent)
(2018/C 307/44)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (14423/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0528/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0177/2017),












1.


Gives its consent to the draft Council decision;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7864 — Trelleborg/ČGS Holding) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, merger control, rubber industry








C_2017174EN.01000102.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7864 — Trelleborg/ČGS Holding)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 174/02)
On 4 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7864. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-330/16: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — Piotr Zarski v Andrzej Stadnicki (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Combating late payments in commercial transactions — Directive 2011/7/EU — Commercial lease contracts of indefinite duration — Late rent payments — Contracts concluded before the period for transposing that directive had expired — National rules — Exclusion of such contracts from the temporal scope of that directive)
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, business lease, commercial transaction, payment, service








C_2017249EN.01001101.xml










31.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/11






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — Piotr Zarski v Andrzej Stadnicki
(Case C-330/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Combating late payments in commercial transactions - Directive 2011/7/EU - Commercial lease contracts of indefinite duration - Late rent payments - Contracts concluded before the period for transposing that directive had expired - National rules - Exclusion of such contracts from the temporal scope of that directive))
(2017/C 249/15)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Piotr Zarski

Respondent: Andrzej Stadnicki

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(4) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions must be interpreted as meaning that the Member States may exclude from the scope of that directive late payments in the performance of a contract concluded before 16 March 2013, even where those late payments occur after that date.


(1)  
            OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2017174EN.01000601.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/6





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2017/C 174/07)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


8.5.2017




Duration


8.5.2017 – 31.12.2017




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


POK/56-14




Species


Saithe (Pollachius virens)




Zone


VI; Union and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


08/TQ127






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Communication pursuant to Article 37(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 concerning the composition of the Conciliation Body, instituted in the context of the clearance of accounts of EAGF and the EAFRD
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, appointment of members, closing of accounts, conciliation procedure (part of ordinary legislative procedure)








C_2017174EN.01000501.xml










1.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/5





Communication pursuant to Article 37(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 concerning the composition of the Conciliation Body, instituted in the context of the clearance of accounts of EAGF and the EAFRD
(2017/C 174/06)
Following Commission Decisions C(2016) 2864 of 18 May 2016 and C(2017) 2250 of 10 April 2017, the composition of the Conciliation Body is as follows:







Chairperson:


Mr Herman HOOYBERGHS








—


appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019








Members:


Ms Isabel BOMBAL DÌAZ








—


re-appointed for the period 1.8.2017 – 31.7.2018








 


Mr Gerald LAVERY








—


appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019








 


Mr Matthias REEH








—


appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019








 


Mr Godfried THISSEN








—


appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019.
Case C-333/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga (Portugal) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Caixa Económica Montepio Geral v Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho and Others
Date: 2017-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bank, banking, civil code, consumer protection, contract, equal treatment, loan








C_2017256EN.01001701.xml










7.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 256/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga (Portugal) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Caixa Económica Montepio Geral v Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho and Others
(Case C-333/17)
(2017/C 256/16)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Caixa Económica Montepio Geral

Defendants: Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho, Maria de Lurdes Coelho Pimenta Marinho, Daniel Pimenta Marinho, Vera da Conceição Pimenta Marinho

Question referred

Does EU Law — in so far as it recognises the fundamental right of Union citizens to consumer protection and the fundamental right to equal treatment of citizens and undertakings, enshrined in Article 38 and Article 21, respectively, of the [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union] — preclude national legislation (sole article of Decree-Law No 32765 of 29 April 1943, which establishes an exception to the general scheme provided for in Article 1143 of the Civil Code), in that that legislation accords the banking sector treatment different from that received by the remaining citizens and undertakings, as regards the form that loan contracts must take, envisaging a less formal form for loan contracts concluded by banks?