do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-328/17: Action brought on 26 May 2017 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)
Date: 2017-05-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, milk product, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017239EN.01005601.xml










24.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 239/56





Action brought on 26 May 2017 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)
(Case T-328/17)
(2017/C 239/69)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board328 of Appeal: M. J. Dairies EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘BBQLOUMI’ — Application for registration No 13 069 034

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16/03/2017 in Case R 497/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-305/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava (Slovakia) lodged on 26 May 2017 — FENS spol. s r.o. v Slovak Republic — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví
Date: 2017-05-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Slovakia, customs duties, electrical energy, electricity supply, export, free movement of goods, measure having equivalent effect, payment








C_2017269EN.01000701.xml










14.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/7





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava (Slovakia) lodged on 26 May 2017 — FENS spol. s r.o. v Slovak Republic — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví
(Case C-305/17)
(2017/C 269/10)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Bratislava

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FENS spol. s r.o.

Defendant: Slovak Republic — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 30 TFEU be interpreted as precluding a national rule such as Article 12(9) of the Nariadenie vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 317/2007 Z. z., ktorým sa ustanovujú pravidlá pre fungovanie trhu s elektrinou (Regulation No 317/2007 of the Government of the Slovak Republic laying down rules for the functioning of the market in electricity — ‘the regulation’) which introduces a specific pecuniary charge for the export of electricity from the territory of the Slovak Republic, regardless of whether that electricity is exported from Slovak territory to the Member States of the European Union or to third countries, in circumstances in which the electricity exporter fails to demonstrate that the electricity exported has been imported into the Slovak Republic, that is to say, a pecuniary charge levied solely on electricity generated in the Republic of Slovakia and exported from it?










2.


Does a pecuniary charge, such as the charge introduced by Article 12(9) of the [regulation], namely: a charge applied solely to electricity generated in the Slovak Republic and at the same time exported from the territory of the Slovak Republic, regardless of whether it is exported to third countries or to the Member States of the European Union, also constitute a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty within the meaning of Article 28(1) TFEU?










3.


Is a national rule such Article 12(9) of the [regulation] compatible with the principle of free movement of goods laid down by Article 28 TFEU?
Case C-306/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 26 May 2017 — Éva Nothartová v József Boldizsár Sámson
Date: 2017-05-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, contract, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, legal domicile, mutual recognition principle








C_2017269EN.01000801.xml










14.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 26 May 2017 — Éva Nothartová v József Boldizsár Sámson
(Case C-306/17)
(2017/C 269/11)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Tatabányai Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Éva Nothartová

Defendant: József Boldizsár Sámson

Question referred

Where there is a counterclaim arising from a contract or facts different from those on which the claim is based, for the purposes of determining jurisdiction to hear and determine the counterclaim:






(a)


Does only Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (‘the Brussels Ia Regulation’) (1) apply because only that provision concerns the counterclaim, or










(b)


Does Article 8(3) of the Brussels Ia Regulation refer solely to a counterclaim arising from the same contract or facts on which the claim is based, so that that regulation does not apply to a counterclaim which does not arise from the same contract or facts on which the claim is based, and for this reason must it be determined, in accordance with the other rules of jurisdiction under the Brussels Ia Regulation, that the court with jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim also has jurisdiction to hear and determine the counterclaim?






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).