do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 May 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (13824/2016 — C8-0527/2016 — 2016/0311(NLE))
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, European Parliament
Subjects: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, accession to the European Union, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, stabilisation and association agreement








C_2018307EN.01019201.xml










30.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/192






P8_TA(2017)0202
EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Agreement (accession of Croatia) ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 May 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (13824/2016 — C8-0527/2016 — 2016/0311(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 307/33)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (13824/2016),










—


having regard to the draft Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (13823/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(i), and Article 218(8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0527/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0169/2017),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Case T-292/17: Action brought on 16 May 2017 — Région Île-de-France v Commission
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, public transport, regional aid, transport company








C_2017231EN.01004102.xml










17.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/41





Action brought on 16 May 2017 — Région Île-de-France v Commission
(Case T-292/17)
(2017/C 231/51)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Région Île-de-France (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission of 2 February 2017 (SA.26763 — (2014/C) –), concerning the aid scheme implemented by France in favour of bus undertakings in the Île-de-France region, in so far as it classified that scheme as State aid;










—


order the Commission to pay all the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Commission refused to classify the support scheme for the region as existing aid.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons for the contested decision. This plea is divided into two parts:






—


First part, alleging a failure to state reasons relating to the criterion of selectivity.










—


Second part, alleging a failure to state reasons relating to the criterion of undue economic advantage.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/833 of 16 May 2017 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Terrasses du Larzac (PDO)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: France, Languedoc-Roussillon, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, still wine








L_2017124EN.01003201.xml










17.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 124/32








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/833
of 16 May 2017
         
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Terrasses du Larzac (PDO)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, France's application to register the name ‘Terrasses du Larzac’ was examined by the Commission and subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Terrasses du Larzac’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of the Regulation.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Terrasses du Larzac’ (PDO) is hereby protected.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 May 2017.


For the Commission


The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 386, 20.10.2016, p. 9.
Case T-785/16: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — BSH Electrodomesticos España v EUIPO — DKSH International (Ufesa) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Ufesa — Amicable settlement — Acquisition by the applicant of the mark applied for — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, clock and watch industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017231EN.01002502.xml










17.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/25





Order of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — BSH Electrodomesticos España v EUIPO — DKSH International (Ufesa)
(Case T-785/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Ufesa - Amicable settlement - Acquisition by the applicant of the mark applied for - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 231/32)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA (Huarte-Pamplona, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Duarte Guimarães and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: DKSH International Ltd. (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Johansson and J. Stock, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 July 2016 (Case R 1691/2015-1) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Electrodomesticos España and DKSH International.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate in the action.










2.


BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office.










3.


DKSH International Ltd. shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.
Case T-159/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Metronia v EUIPO — Zitro IP (TRIPLE O NADA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark TRIPLE O NADA — Earlier EU figurative mark TRIPLE BINGO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, game of chance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017213EN.01002901.xml










3.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/29





Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Metronia v EUIPO — Zitro IP (TRIPLE O NADA)
(Case T-159/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark TRIPLE O NADA - Earlier EU figurative mark TRIPLE BINGO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 213/38)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Metronia, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2016 (Case R 2605/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Zitro IP and Metronia.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Metronia, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/832 of 16 May 2017 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Bürgstadter Berg (PDO)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Bavaria, Germany, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine, white wine








L_2017124EN.01003101.xml










17.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 124/31








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/832
of 16 May 2017
         
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Bürgstadter Berg (PDO)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, Germany's application to register the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ was examined by the Commission and subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of the Regulation.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ (PDO) is hereby protected.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 May 2017.


For the Commission


The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 384, 18.10.2016, p. 4.
Case T-122/15: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Article 70(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 — Single supervisory mechanism — Competences of the ECB — Decentralised exercise by the national authorities — Assessment of the size of a credit institution — Need for direct supervision by the ECB)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, banking supervision, competence of the institution, credit institution, financial control








C_2017213EN.01002601.xml










3.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/26





Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg v ECB
(Case T-122/15) (1)

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Article 70(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Single supervisory mechanism - Competences of the ECB - Decentralised exercise by the national authorities - Assessment of the size of a credit institution - Need for direct supervision by the ECB))
(2017/C 213/34)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg — Förderbank (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: initially by A. Glos, K. Lackhoff and M. Benzing, and subsequently by A. Glos and M. Benzing, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou, R. Bax and A. Riso, and subsequently by E. Koupepidou and R. Bax, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by W. Mölls and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/15/1 of the ECB of 5 January 2015, taken pursuant to Article 6(4) and Article 24(7) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), by which the ECB refused to recognise the applicant as a less significant entity within the meaning of Article 6(4) of that regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders the Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg — Förderbank to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank.










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.
Case T-472/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Marsh v EUIPO (LegalPro) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark LegalPro — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, insurance company, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017221EN.01002401.xml










10.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/24





Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Marsh v EUIPO (LegalPro)
(Case T-472/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark LegalPro - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 221/33)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Marsh GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2016 (Case R 146/2016-4) concerning the application for registration of the word sign ‘LegalPro’ as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Marsh GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.
Case T-218/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Mühlbauer Technology v EUIPO (Magicrown) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Magicrown — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dental medicine, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017221EN.01002102.xml










10.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/21





Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Mühlbauer Technology v EUIPO (Magicrown)
(Case T-218/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Magicrown - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 221/28)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Mühlbauer Technology GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2016 (Case R 1213/2015-4) concerning and application for registration of word sign Magicrown as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mühlbauer Technology GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 May 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020 (13710/2016 — C8-0005/2017 — 2016/0322(NLE))
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU visa policy, Norway, Schengen Agreement, agreement (EU), external border of the EU, financial aid, fund (EU), migration control, ratification of an agreement








C_2018307EN.01019301.xml










30.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/193






P8_TA(2017)0203
EU-Norway Agreement on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 May 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020 (13710/2016 — C8-0005/2017 — 2016/0322(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 307/34)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (13710/2016),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020 (13711/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0005/2017),










—


having regard to the letter from the Committee on Foreign Affairs,










—


having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0174/2017),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Kingdom of Norway.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 May 2017 on the draft Council decision on the accession of the European Union to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) (15540/2016 — C8-0024/2017 — 2016/0349(NLE))
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on Development, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: commodities market, cotton, international market, international organisation, primary product, rules of procedure, textile industry








C_2018307EN.01019401.xml










30.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/194






P8_TA(2017)0204
EU Accession to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 May 2017 on the draft Council decision on the accession of the European Union to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) (15540/2016 — C8-0024/2017 — 2016/0349(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 307/35)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (15540/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 207(3) and (4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0024/2017),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0187/2017),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8455 — STRABAG/Rohöl-Aufsuchungs AG/JV) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-05-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: building industry, economic concentration, energy industry, geothermal energy, merger control








C_2017152EN.01000101.xml










16.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8455 — STRABAG/Rohöl-Aufsuchungs AG/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 152/01)
On 5 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8455. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.