do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-464/16 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request for access to Commission documents — Refusal — Action for annulment — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation before the EU Courts — Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant — Action manifestly inadmissible — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, access to EU information, lawyer, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2017195EN.01000601.xml










19.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 195/6





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) v European Commission
(Case C-464/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Request for access to Commission documents - Refusal - Action for annulment - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Representation before the EU Courts - Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant - Action manifestly inadmissible - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
(2017/C 195/07)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) (represented by: D. Lazar, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.
Case T-77/17: Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — TeamLava v EUIPO — King.com (Icônes animées)
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017178EN.01003501.xml










6.6.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/35





Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — TeamLava v EUIPO — King.com (Icônes animées)
(Case T-77/17)
(2017/C 178/57)
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
Case T-238/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking v Scouring Environment (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Non-performance of the contract — Repayment of the sums advanced — Default interest — Procedure by default)
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Joint Undertaking, Framework Programme for Research and Development, aeronautical industry, financial aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2017161EN.01002801.xml










22.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/28





Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking v Scouring Environment
(Case T-238/16) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Non-performance of the contract - Repayment of the sums advanced - Default interest - Procedure by default))
(2017/C 161/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Mastantuono, acting as Agent, assisted by M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Scouring Environment SARL (Tauriac, France)

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 272 TFEU for an order that Scouring Environment repay the sum advanced under Grant Agreement No 287071, together with default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Orders Scouring Environment SARL to repay the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking the sum of EUR 60 000, together with accrued default interest calculated at the rate of 3,65 % per annum from 12 September 2014 until the date of full payment of the amount due;










2.


Orders Scouring Environment to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, France, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2017108EN.01001001.xml










6.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/10





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2017/C 108/07)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


16.2.2017




Duration


16.2.2017-31.12.2017




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


SBR/678-




Species


Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo)




Zone


Union and international waters of VI, VII and VIII




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


04/TQ2285






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8391 — Toyota Industries Europe/Vive) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, machinery, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2017108EN.01001901.xml










6.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/19





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8391 — Toyota Industries Europe/Vive)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 108/17)






1.


On 29 March 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Toyota Industries Europe AB, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Toyota Industries Corporation (‘TICO’, Japan) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Vive B.V. (‘Vive’, the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares. Vive is the sole shareholder of Vanderlande Industries Holding B.V. (‘Vanderlande’).










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for TICO: manufacturing and sale of automobiles, engines, compressors for automotive air-conditioners, foundry parts, electronic components, material-handling equipment, logistics services and textile machinery.
—   for Vive/Vanderlande: design, manufacture, sale and integration of industrial process control and automation equipment for airports, wharehousing and parcel handling.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8391 – Toyota Industries Europe/Vive, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-35/15: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Alkarim for Trade and Industry v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, trade restriction








C_2017161EN.01002201.xml










22.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/22





Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Alkarim for Trade and Industry v Council
(Case T-35/15) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Manifest error of assessment))
(2017/C 161/30)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Alkarim for Trade and Industry LLC (Tal Kurdi, Syria) (represented by: J.-P. Buyle and L. Cloquet, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially G. Étienne and S. Kyriakopoulou, and subsequently S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2014/730/CFSP of 20 October 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2014 L 301, p. 36), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2014 of 20 October 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2014 L 301, p. 7), in so far as the name of the applicant has been included in the list of the persons and bodies to which the restrictive measures apply.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Implementing Decision 2014/730/CFSP of 20 October 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2014 of 20 October 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria in so far as they concern Alkarim for Trade and Industry LLC;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Alkarim for Trade and Industry.






(1)  OJ C 89 of 16.3.2015.
Case T-39/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v EUIPO — Fink (NANA FINK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark NANA FINK — Earlier EU word mark NANA — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Duty to rule on the entirety of the action)
Date: 2017-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017161EN.01002502.xml










22.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/25





Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v EUIPO — Fink (NANA FINK)
(Case T-39/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark NANA FINK - Earlier EU word mark NANA - No similarity between the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Duty to rule on the entirety of the action))
(2017/C 161/35)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Nadine Fink (Basel, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2015 (Case R 679/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp and Ms Fink.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 November 2015 (Case R 679/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Ms Nadine Fink, in so far as the Board of Appeal failed to rule on the action before it with regard to ‘precious metals and their alloys’ in Class 14 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and covered by the figurative mark which was the subject of International Registration No 1111651 designating the European Union;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.