do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-323/15 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Polynt SpA v New Japan Chemical, REACh ChemAdvice GmbH, Sitre Srl, European Chemicals Agency, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride)
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical product, dangerous substance, health risk, market approval, respiratory disease








C_2017151EN.01000501.xml










15.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/5





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Polynt SpA v New Japan Chemical, REACh ChemAdvice GmbH, Sitre Srl, European Chemicals Agency, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission
(Case C-323/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Article 57(f) - Authorisation - Substances of very high concern - Identification - Equivalent level of concern - Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride))
(2017/C 151/06)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Polynt SpA (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: New Japan Chemical (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), REACh ChemAdvice GmbH (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), Sitre Srl (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and J. Stuyck, advocaat), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Schillemans and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: D. Kukovec and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Polynt SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);










3.


Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs;










4.


Orders New Japan Chemical and REACh ChemAdvice GmbH to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.
Internal Security Fund : borders and visas : European Union supporting actions and cooperation on security.
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs
Subjects: EU police cooperation, EU visa policy, European security, border control, external border of the EU, frontier, fund (EU)

European Union supporting actions and cooperation on security

Internal 
Security Fund: 
borders and visas

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/financing/index_en.htm

Migration and
Home Affairs

       ISF

DR-06-16-341-EN-N
Case T-150/15: Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belgium, EU financing, EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, auditing, contract terms, debt, law of states, public health








C_2017144EN.01006103.xml










8.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 144/61





Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission
(Case T-150/15) (1)

(2017/C 144/88)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/596 of 15 March 2017 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [West Wales Coracle Caught Sewin (IGP)]
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, Wales, designation of origin, fresh fish, labelling, product designation, sea fish








L_2017081EN.01001401.xml










28.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 81/14








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/596
of 15 March 2017
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [West Wales Coracle Caught Sewin (IGP)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘West Wales Coracle Caught Sewin’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘West Wales Coracle Caught Sewin’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘West Wales Coracle Caught Sewin’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 15 March 2017.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 455, 6.12.2016, p. 11.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-528/15: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie v Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor, (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 28(2) — Detention for the purpose of transfer — Article 2(n) — Significant risk of absconding — Objective criteria — Absence of a legal definition)
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, foreign national, imprisonment, right of asylum, stateless person








C_2017151EN.01000801.xml










15.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/8





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie v Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor,
(Case C-528/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) - Article 28(2) - Detention for the purpose of transfer - Article 2(n) - Significant risk of absconding - Objective criteria - Absence of a legal definition))
(2017/C 151/11)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie

Defendants: Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(n) and Article 28(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, read in conjunction, must be interpreted as requiring Member States to establish, in a binding provision of general application, objective criteria underlying the reasons for believing that an applicant for international protection who is subject to a transfer procedure may abscond. The absence of such a provision leads to the inapplicability of Article 28(2) of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 March 2017 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece (12211/2016 — C8-0477/2016 — 2016/0816(CNS))
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: DNA, Greece, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, information system, personal data








C_2018263EN.01036201.xml










25.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/362






P8_TA(2017)0080
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 March 2017 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece (12211/2016 — C8-0477/2016 — 2016/0816(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 263/35)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (12211/2016),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0477/2016),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0053/2017),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8207 — Emerson Electric/Pentair valves and controls business) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, mechanical engineering, merger control








C_2017080EN.01000101.xml










15.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8207 — Emerson Electric/Pentair valves and controls business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 80/01)
On 7 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8207. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-414/15 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Stichting Woonlinie, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting Woonstede v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (Appeal — State aid — Existing aid — Article 108(1) TFEU — Aid schemes in favour of social housing corporations — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 17, 18 and 19 — Assessment by the Commission of the compatibility with the internal market of an existing aid scheme — Proposal of appropriate measures — Commitments given by the national authorities in order to comply with EU law — Compatibility decision — Scope of judicial review — Legal effects)
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, State aid, control of State aid, judicial review, subsidised housing








C_2017151EN.01000602.xml










15.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/6





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Stichting Woonlinie, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting Woonstede v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN)
(Case C-414/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - State aid - Existing aid - Article 108(1) TFEU - Aid schemes in favour of social housing corporations - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Articles 17, 18 and 19 - Assessment by the Commission of the compatibility with the internal market of an existing aid scheme - Proposal of appropriate measures - Commitments given by the national authorities in order to comply with EU law - Compatibility decision - Scope of judicial review - Legal effects))
(2017/C 151/08)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Appellants: Stichting Woonlinie, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting Woonstede (represented by: L. Hancher, E. Besselink and P. Glazener, advocaten)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Belgium, Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, advocaat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2015, Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission (T-202/10 RENV, not published, EU:T:2015:287);










2.


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Case T-151/15: Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belgium, EU financing, EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, auditing, contract terms, debt, food safety, law of states








C_2017144EN.01006104.xml










8.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 144/61





Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission
(Case T-151/15) (1)

(2017/C 144/89)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
Case C-3/16: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Lucio Cesare Aquino v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU law — Rights conferred on individuals — Infringement by a court — Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Reference to the Court — National court of last instance)
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law, appeal, fundamental rights, higher court, judicial proceedings, preliminary ruling procedure








C_2017151EN.01001001.xml










15.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/10





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Lucio Cesare Aquino v Belgische Staat
(Case C-3/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU law - Rights conferred on individuals - Infringement by a court - Questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Reference to the Court - National court of last instance))
(2017/C 151/14)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Lucio Cesare Aquino

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a court against whose decisions there is a judicial remedy under national law may not be regarded as a court adjudicating at last instance, where an appeal on a point of law against a decision of that court is not examined because of discontinuance by the appellant.










2.


There is no need to answer Question 2.










3.


The third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a court adjudicating at last instance may decline to refer a question to the Court for a preliminary ruling where an appeal on a point of law is dismissed on grounds of inadmissibility specific to the procedure before that court, subject to compliance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness.






(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.
Case C-324/15 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Hitachi Chemical Europe GmbH, Polynt SpA v New Japan Chemical, REACh ChemAdvice GmbH, Sitre Srl, European Chemicals Agency, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Hexahydromethylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-1-methylphthalic anhydride and hexahydro-3-methylphthalic anhydride)
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical product, dangerous substance, health risk, market approval, respiratory disease








C_2017151EN.01000601.xml










15.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/6





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Hitachi Chemical Europe GmbH, Polynt SpA v New Japan Chemical, REACh ChemAdvice GmbH, Sitre Srl, European Chemicals Agency, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission
(Case C-324/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Article 57(f) - Authorisation - Substances of very high concern - Identification - Equivalent level of concern - Hexahydromethylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-1-methylphthalic anhydride and hexahydro-3-methylphthalic anhydride))
(2017/C 151/07)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Hitachi Chemical Europe GmbH, Polynt SpA (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: New Japan Chemical (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), REACh ChemAdvice GmbH (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), Sitre Srl (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and J. Stuyck, advocaat), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Schillemans and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: D. Kukovec and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Hitachi Chemical Europe GmbH and Polynt SpA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);










3.


Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs;










4.


Orders New Japan Chemical and REACh ChemAdvice GmbH to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.
Case T-174/15: Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belgium, EU financing, EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, biotechnology, contract terms, debt, law of states








C_2017144EN.01006105.xml










8.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 144/61





Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission
(Case T-174/15) (1)

(2017/C 144/90)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-03-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2017080EN.01000201.xml










15.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

14 March 2017
(2017/C 80/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0631 




JPY


Japanese yen


122,13 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4338 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87563 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4968 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0726 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,1510 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,021 




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,32 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3221 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5435 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,9776 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4073 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4338 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2598 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5389 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5039 




KRW


South Korean won


1 222,47 




ZAR


South African rand


13,9904 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3511 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4260 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 213,91 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7303 




PHP


Philippine peso


53,481 




RUB


Russian rouble


63,1241 




THB


Thai baht


37,554 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,3591 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,8468 




INR


Indian rupee


69,9170 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.