do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-380/16: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2017 — Popescu v Romania (Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
Date: 2017-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, indemnification, jurisdiction, offence, regional and local authorities








C_2017144EN.01004502.xml










8.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 144/45





Order of the General Court of 8 March 2017 — Popescu v Romania
(Case T-380/16)
((Manifest lack of jurisdiction))
(2017/C 144/62)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Doina Popescu (Slatina, Romania) (represented by: M. Ispas, lawyer)

Defendant: Romania

Re:

Application seeking to obtain, first, the conviction of several Romanian national authorities for alleged criminal acts and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Ms Doina Popescu shall bear her own costs.
Case T-166/17: Action brought on 8 March 2017 — EKETA v Commission
Date: 2017-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, claim, expenditure, financial aid, information technology applications, reimbursement of aid, research project, scientific research








C_2017151EN.01003901.xml










15.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/39





Action brought on 8 March 2017 — EKETA v Commission
(Case T-166/17)
(2017/C 151/50)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos and S. Paliou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


declare that the request made by the European Commission to ΕΚΕΤΑ to reimburse the amount of EUR 197 799,52 of the payment received by it for the SENSATION project, that request being made in the debit note 3241615291/29.11.2016, is unfounded with respect to the sum of EUR 191 039,55;










—


declare that the sum of EUR 191 039,55 constitutes eligible costs and that ΕΚΕΤΑ is not obliged to repay that sum to the European Commission, and










—


order the European Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments







1.


By this action, the Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) challenges the requests made by the Commission by means of its debit note 3241615291/29.11.2016, in relation to participation in the SENSATION project. By means of that debit note, the Commission requested that ΕΚΕΤΑ reimburse part of the payment received by it for the SENSATION project, a sum of EUR 197 799,52. The request follows an on-the-spot audit which was carried out by the European Commission at the applicant’s premises.










2.


In that context, the applicant claims that the General Court of the European Union, under Article 272 TFEU, should declare that, out of the above amount stated in the debit note, the sum of EUR 191 039,55 constitutes eligible costs and that ΕΚΕΤΑ is not obliged to repay that sum to the Commission.










3.


ΕΚΕΤΑ maintains that the above amount of EUR 191 039,55 constitutes eligible staff costs, subcontracting costs and indirect costs, which the Commission wrongly rejected as being ineligible. The eligibility of the applicant’s costs is demonstrated by the evidence that it submitted to the European Commission at the on-the-spot audit and in subsequent correspondence and that it submits to the General Court.
Case T-151/17: Action brought on 8 March 2017 — Marriott Worldwide v EUIPO — Graf (Representation of a winged bull)
Date: 2017-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017129EN.01003501.xml










24.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/35





Action brought on 8 March 2017 — Marriott Worldwide v EUIPO — Graf (Representation of a winged bull)
(Case T-151/17)
(2017/C 129/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Marriott Worldwide Corp. (Bethesda, Maryland, United States) (represented by: A. Reid, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Johann Graf (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a winged bull) — EU trade mark No 10 511 723

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2017 in Case R 165/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 53(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.