do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2017/476 of 3 March 2017 appointing a member, proposed by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of the European Economic and Social Committee
Date: 2017-03-03
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Economic and Social Committee, Luxembourg, appointment of members








L_2017073EN.01001401.xml










18.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 73/14








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/476
of 3 March 2017
         
appointing a member, proposed by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of the European Economic and Social Committee


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the Government of Luxembourg,


Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.












(2)


A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Henri WAGENER,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Christophe HANSEN, Adviser in European Affairs, Chamber of Commerce of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 3 March 2017.


For the Council


The President

M. FARRUGIA
            





(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8290 — Fairfax/AIG Target Portfolio) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, merger control, reinsurance








C_2017067EN.01000101.xml










3.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 67/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8290 — Fairfax/AIG Target Portfolio)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 67/01)
On 27 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8290. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-109/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 3 March 2017 — Bankia S.A. v Juan Carlos Marí Merino, Juan Pérez Gavilán and María Concepción Marí Merino
Date: 2017-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, enforcement of ruling, mortgage, real property, restriction on competition, unfair terms of contract








C_2017161EN.01001301.xml










22.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/13





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 3 March 2017 — Bankia S.A. v Juan Carlos Marí Merino, Juan Pérez Gavilán and María Concepción Marí Merino
(Case C-109/17)
(2017/C 161/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Bankia S.A.

Defendants: Juan Carlos Marí Merino, Juan Pérez Gavilán and María Concepción Marí Merino

Questions referred







1.


Must Directive 2005/29/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that national legislation such as that currently regulating Spanish mortgage enforcement — Article 695 et seq. in conjunction with Article 552(1) of the Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (Code of Civil Procedure) — which does not provide for the review by the courts, of their own motion or even at the request of one of the parties, of unfair commercial practices, is contrary to Article 11 of that directive because that national legislation hinders or prevents review by the courts of contracts or acts which may contain unfair commercial practices?










2.


Must Directive 2005/29/EEC be interpreted as meaning that national legislation such as the Spanish law which does not ensure actual compliance with the code of conduct if the party seeking enforcement of a debt decides not to apply that code (Articles 5 and 6 in conjunction with Article 15 of Royal Decree-Law No 6 of 9 March 2012) is contrary to Article 11 of that directive?










3.


Must Article 11 of Directive 2005/29/EEC be interpreted as precluding Spanish national legislation which does not allow a consumer, during mortgage enforcement proceedings, to request compliance with a code of conduct, in particular as regards the giving of a property in payment and extinguishment of the debt — Point 3 of the Annex to Royal Decree-Law No 6 of 9 March 2012, Code of Good Practice?






(1)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22).