do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-66/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2017 — Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, enforcement of ruling, legal expenses








C_2017161EN.01000801.xml










22.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2017 — Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG
(Case C-66/17)
(2017/C 161/10)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś

Defendant: DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG

Question referred

Should Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (1) … (‘Regulation No 805/2004’), read in conjunction with Article 7 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that a European Enforcement Order certificate may be issued in respect of a decision concerning reimbursement of the costs of proceedings contained in a judgment in which a court has established the existence of a right?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15.
Case T-908/16: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2017 — Starbucks (HK) v EUIPO — Now Wireless (nowwireless)
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, data processing, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2017112EN.01005102.xml










10.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/51





Order of the General Court of 7 February 2017 — Starbucks (HK) v EUIPO — Now Wireless (nowwireless)
(Case T-908/16) (1)

(2017/C 112/72)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8074 — Schneider Electric/DB Energie/inno2grid JV) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services








C_2017039EN.01000102.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8074 — Schneider Electric/DB Energie/inno2grid JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 39/02)
On 19 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8074. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-593/16: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2017 — Stips v Commission (Action for damages — Civil service — Temporary staff — No request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: indemnification, reassignment, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2017112EN.01003701.xml










10.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/37





Order of the General Court of 7 February 2017 — Stips v Commission
(Case T-593/16) (1)

((Action for damages - Civil service - Temporary staff - No request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2017/C 112/51)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Adolf Stips (Besozzo, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant due to the delay in the organisation of the 2013 reclassification procedure.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Adolf Stips shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-23/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).
Case T-82/17: Action brought on 7 February 2017 — PepsiCo v EUIPO — Intersnack Group (Exxtra Deep)
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery product, nut, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017121EN.01003701.xml










18.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 121/37





Action brought on 7 February 2017 — PepsiCo v EUIPO — Intersnack Group (Exxtra Deep)
(Case T-82/17)
(2017/C 121/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: PepsiCo, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intersnack Group GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Exxtra Deep’ — EU trade mark No 12 161 981

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2016 in Case R 482/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8279 — NN Group/CBRE/PV/Real Estate Portfolio in Germany) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance, investment company, logistics, merger control, postal service, real estate business








C_2017039EN.01000201.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8279 — NN Group/CBRE/PV/Real Estate Portfolio in Germany)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 39/03)
On 25 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8279. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-89/17: Action brought on 7 February 2017 — Erwin Müller v EUIPO — Novus Tablet Technology Finland (NOVUS)
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, registered trade mark, telecommunications, textile product, trade-mark law








C_2017112EN.01004302.xml










10.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/43





Action brought on 7 February 2017 — Erwin Müller v EUIPO — Novus Tablet Technology Finland (NOVUS)
(Case T-89/17)
(2017/C 112/60)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Erwin Müller GmbH (Lingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Grüger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Novus Tablet Technology Finland Oy (Turku, Finland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘NOVUS’ — Application for registration No 13 206 611

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2016 in Case R 2413/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul in part the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 2 October 2015, Application No B 2 456 336, namely in so far as they relate to goods in Class 9 — ‘bags adapted for laptops; holders adapted for mobile phones; computer peripheral devices’;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-446/16 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2017 — Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH, DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH v European Commission (Appeal — Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 — Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Traditional specialities guaranteed — Late lodging of opposition measure by the competent national authorities — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, quality control of agricultural products








C_2017129EN.01000501.xml










24.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/5





Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2017 — Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH, DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH v European Commission
(Case C-446/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs - Traditional specialities guaranteed - Late lodging of opposition measure by the competent national authorities - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal manifestly unfounded))
(2017/C 129/06)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH, DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (represented by: A Wagner, Rechtanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and A. Lewis, acting as Agents)

The operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
Notice for the attention of Mr Mohamed Zohir Mohamed Wahed Garrana and Mr Amir Mohamed Zohir Mohamed Wahed Garrana subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172 CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Egypt, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2017039EN.01000601.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/6





Notice for the attention of Mr Mohamed Zohir Mohamed Wahed Garrana and Mr Amir Mohamed Zohir Mohamed Wahed Garrana subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172 CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt
(2017/C 39/07)
The following information is brought to the attention of the above-mentioned persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt.
The Council holds on its file new elements concerning these persons. They are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 13 February 2017, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 270/2011. In order for any observations to be considered at the next review, they should be submitted by 17 February 2017.


(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2017039EN.01000701.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 February 2017
(2017/C 39/08)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0712 




JPY


Japanese yen


120,28 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4372 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85950 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4605 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0670 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8460 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,021 




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,16 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2767 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5085 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,9404 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4006 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3987 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3105 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4672 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5106 




KRW


South Korean won


1 217,20 




ZAR


South African rand


14,2426 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3500 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4490 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 241,60 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7422 




PHP


Philippine peso


53,180 




RUB


Russian rouble


63,0404 




THB


Thai baht


37,513 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,3408 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8217 




INR


Indian rupee


71,9450 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Community Plant Variety Office — Call for expression of interest in the appointment as Chairperson of the Board of Appeal (COM/2017/20018)
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Community Plant Variety Office, competition (EU), job vacancy, president of an institution, recruitment








CA2017039EN.01000101.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 39/1





COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE
Call for expression of interest in the appointment as Chairperson of the Board of Appeal
(COM/2017/20018)
(2017/C 039 A/01)
 
The Community Plant Variety Office is seeking to appoint the Chairperson of its Board of Appeal.
Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.
The Chairperson shall be appointed by the Council from a list of candidates which shall be proposed by the Commission after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office. Information on the remuneration may be acquired on request to the secretariat of the Board of Appeal (Community Plant Variety Office, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). The Community Plant Variety Office and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.
The full call for expression of interest and the link to the on-line application form are available at the following address: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/
The delay for the receipt of applications is 8 March 2017 (see details in the application instructions).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8338 — Apax Partners/Unilabs) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health service, merger control








C_2017039EN.01000202.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8338 — Apax Partners/Unilabs)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 39/04)
On 25 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8338. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-67/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Varna (Bulgaria), lodged on 7 February 2017 — Todor Iliev v Blagovesta Ilieva
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: division of property, divorce, jurisdiction, married person, matrimonial law, personal property, real property, residence








C_2017112EN.01003001.xml










10.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/30





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Varna (Bulgaria), lodged on 7 February 2017 — Todor Iliev v Blagovesta Ilieva
(Case C-67/17)
(2017/C 112/39)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Todor Iliev

Defendant: Blagovesta Ilieva

Questions referred







1.


Does an action between former spouses on the division of movable property acquired during the marriage as joint property of the spouses constitute a legal dispute relating to rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship within the meaning of Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation No 44/2001 (1)?










2.


Is a dispute concerning the division of a movable property acquired during the marriage, but registered with the competent national authorities only in the name of one of the spouses, excluded from its scope under Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation No 44/2001?










3.


Which court has jurisdiction over a dispute between former spouses on the ownership of immovable property acquired during their civil marriage, when the spouses are nationals of an EU Member State, but it has been established in the proceedings that at the time of entering the marriage, acquisition of the property, ending the marriage and the application for division of the property after the marriage had ended, they had their place of residence in another Member State?






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8229 — Hammerson/Irish Life/ILAC Shopping Centre) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, property leasing, real estate business








C_2017039EN.01000101.xml










7.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8229 — Hammerson/Irish Life/ILAC Shopping Centre)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 39/01)
On 14 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8229. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.