do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-130/16: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2017 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of two red oblique curves) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of an EU figurative mark representing two red oblique curves — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to assess the distinctiveness of a mark by reference to the perception which the relevant public has of it)
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mechanical engineering, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017078EN.01003001.xml










13.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/30





Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2017 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of two red oblique curves)
(Case T-130/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for registration of an EU figurative mark representing two red oblique curves - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to assess the distinctiveness of a mark by reference to the perception which the relevant public has of it))
(2017/C 078/41)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Coesia SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, Agent)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2016 (Case R 1933/2015-2) concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing two red oblique curves.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 January 2016 (Case R 1933/2015-2);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.
Case T-60/17: Action brought on 31 January 2017 — Safe Skies v EUIPO — Travel Sentry (TSA LOCK)
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leather, metal product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017104EN.01005502.xml










3.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/55





Action brought on 31 January 2017 — Safe Skies v EUIPO — Travel Sentry (TSA LOCK)
(Case T-60/17)
(2017/C 104/77)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Safe Skies LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: V. Schwepler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Travel Sentry, Inc. (Windermere, Florida, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TSA LOCK’ — EU trade mark No 4 530 168

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2016 in Case R 233/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the Defendant to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the court and to order the (potential) Intervener to pay the costs of the administrative proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










—


set a date for an Oral Hearing for the case that findings of the General Court are not possible without an Oral Hearing.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-50/17 P: Appeal brought on 31 January 2017 by Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2016 in Case T-561/15, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja v EUIPO — Universidad de la Rioja (Universidad Internacional de la Rioja UNIR)
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, education, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, university








C_2017231EN.01000202.xml










17.7.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/2





Appeal brought on 31 January 2017 by Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2016 in Case T-561/15, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja v EUIPO — Universidad de la Rioja (Universidad Internacional de la Rioja UNIR)
(Case C-50/17 P)
(2017/C 231/03)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (represented by: C. Lema Devesa and A. Porras Fernandez-Toledano, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 1 June 2017, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, S.A. to bear its own costs.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1969 of 12 September 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (OJ L 307, 15.11.2016)
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: dual-use good, export (EU), export licence, export monitoring, intra-EU trade, trade restriction, transit








L_2017025EN.01003601.xml










31.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 25/36







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1969 of 12 September 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 307 of 15 November 2016
)


On page 119, Annex I, point 3A001.g of the text replacing Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009:
for:






‘1.


A maximum turn-on current rate of rise (di/dt) greater than 30 000 A/ms and off-state voltage greater than 1 100 V; or










2.


A maximum turn-on current rate of rise (di/dt) greater than 2 000 A/ms and having all of the following:’,




read:






‘1.


A maximum turn-on current rate of rise (di/dt) greater than 30 000 A/μs and off-state voltage greater than 1 100 V; or










2.


A maximum turn-on current rate of rise (di/dt) greater than 2 000 A/μs and having all of the following:’;




On page 163, Annex I, point 6A003.a.3 of the text replacing Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009:
for:







‘a.


Mechanical streak cameras having writing speeds exceeding 10 mm/ms;’,





read:







‘a.


Mechanical streak cameras having writing speeds exceeding 10 mm/μs;’.
Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2016 of the Joint Committee on Agriculture of 16 November 2016 on amending Annex 10 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products [2017/51] (OJ L 7, 12.1.2017)
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: EU–Switzerland Joint Committee
Subjects: Switzerland, agricultural product, fresh fruit, fresh vegetable, product quality, quality control of agricultural products, revision of an agreement, trade agreement (EU)








L_2017025EN.01003602.xml










31.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 25/36







Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2016 of the Joint Committee on Agriculture of 16 November 2016 on amending Annex 10 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products [2017/51]

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 12 January 2017
)


On page 21, signatories:
for:



                     ‘Krisztina BENDE’,


read:



                     ‘Josef RENGGLI’.
Case T-57/17: Action brought on 31 January 2017 — Pegasus v Parliament
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European party, equal treatment, freedom of association, freedom of expression, party financing, restriction on competition








C_2017078EN.01004201.xml










13.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/42





Action brought on 31 January 2017 — Pegasus v Parliament
(Case T-57/17)
(2017/C 078/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Pegasus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Reference: FINS-2017-31) concerning the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the specified maximum amount and ordering that a guarantee be lodged;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, which is in essence identical or similar to that raised in Case T-54/17, CLF v Parliament.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8327 — Fairfax/Sagard Holdings/PSG) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, sports equipment








C_2017031EN.01005901.xml










31.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/59





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8327 — Fairfax/Sagard Holdings/PSG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 31/10)
On 24 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8327. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-70/17: Action brought on 31 January 2017 — TenneT Holding v. EUIPO — Ngrid Intellectual Property (NorthSeaGrid)
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy grid, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2017104EN.01005901.xml










3.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/59





Action brought on 31 January 2017 — TenneT Holding v. EUIPO — Ngrid Intellectual Property (NorthSeaGrid)
(Case T-70/17)
(2017/C 104/82)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: TenneT Holding BV (Arnhem, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Limperg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ngrid Intellectual Property Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘NorthSeaGrid’ — Application for registration No 12 223 517

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2016 in Case R 1607/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/161 of 31 January 2017 correcting the French language version of Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 laying down requirements and administrative procedures related to aerodromes pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Aviation Safety Agency, air safety, airport, approval, civil aviation, roadworthiness tests








L_2017027EN.01009901.xml










1.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 27/99








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/161
of 31 January 2017
         
correcting the French language version of Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 laying down requirements and administrative procedures related to aerodromes pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC (1),and in particular Article 8a(5) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Errors occurred in the French language ersion of Commission Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 (2) laying down requirements and administrative procedures related to aerodromes. Therefore a correction in the French language version of Annexes II and IV to that Regulation is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.












(2)


Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 should therefore be corrected accordingly.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 65 of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Concerns only the French language version)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 January 2017.


For the Commission


The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 79, 19.3.2008, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 of 12 February 2014 laying down requirements and administrative procedures related to aerodromes pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 44, 14.2.2014, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2017031EN.01006001.xml










31.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/60





Euro exchange rates (1)

30 January 2017
(2017/C 31/11)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0630 




JPY


Japanese yen


121,76 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4375 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84935 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4390 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0669 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8758 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,022 




HUF


Hungarian forint


310,80 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3310 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5008 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,0561 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4109 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3983 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2476 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4668 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5177 




KRW


South Korean won


1 252,27 




ZAR


South African rand


14,4510 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3103 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4773 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 173,38 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7094 




PHP


Philippine peso


52,899 




RUB


Russian rouble


63,7792 




THB


Thai baht


37,492 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,3318 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,0850 




INR


Indian rupee


72,2315 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences
Date: 2017-01-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: United States, cooperation agreement (EU), data protection, exchange of information, fight against crime, offence, personal data, police cooperation, protection of privacy








L_2017025EN.01000101.xml










31.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 25/1







Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences

The Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences (1), signed on 2 June 2016, will, in accordance with Article 29(1) thereof, enter into force on 1 February 2017.


(1)  
            OJ L 336, 10.12.2016, p.3.