do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-238/16: Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Münster — Germany) — X v Finanzamt I
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, blood transfusion, pharmaceutical industry, tax exemption, tax relief, trade in organs








C_2017129EN.01001303.xml










24.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/13





Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Münster — Germany) — X v Finanzamt I
(Case C-238/16) (1)

(2017/C 129/19)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.
Case C-365/15: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Reimbursement of import duties — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (Customs Code) — Article 241, first paragraph, first indent — Obligation of a Member State to provide for the payment of default interest even where no action has been brought before the national courts)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: anti-dumping duty, common customs tariff, customs drawback, customs union, import (EU), interest








C_2017070EN.01000501.xml










6.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/5





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
(Case C-365/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Reimbursement of import duties - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (Customs Code) - Article 241, first paragraph, first indent - Obligation of a Member State to provide for the payment of default interest even where no action has been brought before the national courts))
(2017/C 070/06)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

Operative part of the judgment

Where import duties, including anti-dumping duties, are reimbursed on the ground that they have been levied in breach of EU law, this being a matter for the referring court to determine, there is an obligation on Member States, arising from EU law, to pay to individuals with a right to reimbursement the corresponding interest which runs from the date of payment by those individuals of the duties reimbursed.


(1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.
Case C-37/16: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Stowarzyszenie Artystów Wykonawców Utworów Muzycznych i Słowno-Muzycznych SAWP (SAWP) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax — Taxable transactions — Concept of ‘supply of services for consideration’ — Payment of fees, in respect of fair compensation, to organisations collectively managing copyright and related rights — Not included)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, copyright, provision of services, recording equipment, recording medium, sale, taxable income








C_2017070EN.01000702.xml










6.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/7





Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Stowarzyszenie Artystów Wykonawców Utworów Muzycznych i Słowno-Muzycznych SAWP (SAWP)
(Case C-37/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax - Taxable transactions - Concept of ‘supply of services for consideration’ - Payment of fees, in respect of fair compensation, to organisations collectively managing copyright and related rights - Not included))
(2017/C 070/11)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Minister Finansów

Respondent: Stowarzyszenie Artystów Wykonawców Utworów Muzycznych i Słowno-Muzycznych SAWP (SAWP)

Intervening parties: Prokuratura Generalna, Stowarzyszenie Zbiorowego Zarządzania Prawami Autorskimi Twórców Dzieł Naukowych i Technicznych Kopipol, Stowarzyszenie Autorów i Wydawców Copyright Polska

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that holders of reproduction rights do not make a supply of services, within the meaning of that directive, to producers and importers of blank media and of recording and reproduction devices on whom organisations collectively managing copyright and related rights levy on behalf of those rightholders, but in their own name, fees in respect of the sale of those devices and media.


(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.
Case C-20/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2017 — Vincent Pierre Oberle
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: inheritance, jurisdiction, law of succession, official document, primacy of EU law








C_2017112EN.01001901.xml










10.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/19





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2017 — Vincent Pierre Oberle
(Case C-20/17)
(2017/C 112/27)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Vincent Pierre Oberle

Question referred

Is Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession (1) (Regulation No 650/2012) to be interpreted as meaning that it also determines exclusive international jurisdiction in respect of the granting, in the Member States, of national certificates of succession which have not been replaced by the European certificate of succession (see Article 62(3) of Regulation No 650/2012), with the result that divergent provisions adopted by national legislatures with regard to international jurisdiction in respect of the granting of national certificates of succession — such as Paragraph 105 of the Familiengesetzbuch (the Family Code) in Germany — are ineffective on the ground that they infringe higher-ranking European law?


(1)  OJ 2012 L 201, p. 107.
Case T-92/11 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2017 –Andersen v Commission (State aid — Rail transport — Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking Danske Statsbaner (DSB) — Public service contracts for the supply of rail passenger transport services between Copenhagen and Ystad — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to certain conditions — Temporal application of rules of substantive law — Service of general economic interest — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, inland transport, provision of services, public contract, public sector, rail transport, services of general interest








C_2017086EN.01002301.xml










20.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/23





Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2017 –Andersen v Commission
(Case T-92/11 RENV) (1)

((State aid - Rail transport - Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking Danske Statsbaner (DSB) - Public service contracts for the supply of rail passenger transport services between Copenhagen and Ystad - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to certain conditions - Temporal application of rules of substantive law - Service of general economic interest - Manifest error of assessment))
(2017/C 086/30)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Jørgen Andersen (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: J. Rivas Andrés and M.-I. Rantou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Thorning, acting as Agent, assisted by R. Holdgaard, lawyer) and Danske Statsbaner (DSB), (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: M. Honoré, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Dansk Tog (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: G. van de Walle de Ghelcke, J. Rivas Andrés and F. Nissen Morten, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/3/EU of 24 February 2010 concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (State aid C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the second paragraph of Article 1 of Commission Decision 2011/3/EU of 24 February 2010 concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (State aid C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) in so far as it concerns the payment of 21 December 2009;










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










3.


Orders Mr Jørgen Andersen, the European Commission, Dansk Tog, the Kingdom of Denmark and Danske Statsbaner (DSB) to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.
European Parliament decision of 18 January 2017 on the numerical strength of the standing committees (2016/3040(RSO))
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EP Committee, appointment of members, composition of a parliamentary committee, decision-making body (EU), standing committee








C_2018242EN.01004401.xml










10.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/44





P8_TA(2017)0001
Numerical strength of the standing committees
European Parliament decision of 18 January 2017 on the numerical strength of the standing committees (2016/3040(RSO))
(2018/C 242/07)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal by the Conference of Presidents,










—


having regard to its decision of 15 January 2014 on the powers and responsibilities of the standing committees (1),










—


having regard to Rule 196 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Decides that the numerical strength of the standing committees and subcommittees shall be as follows:






I.


Committee on Foreign Affairs: 73 members,










II.


Committee on Development: 28 members,










III.


Committee on International Trade: 41 members,










IV.


Committee on Budgets: 41 members,










V.


Committee on Budgetary Control: 30 members,










VI.


Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs: 61 members,










VII.


Committee on Employment and Social Affairs: 55 members,










VIII.


Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety: 69 members,










IX.


Committee on Industry, Research and Energy: 67 members,










X.


Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection: 40 members,










XI.


Committee on Transport and Tourism: 49 members,










XII.


Committee on Regional Development: 43 members,










XIII.


Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development: 46 members,










XIV.


Committee on Fisheries: 27 members,










XV.


Committee on Culture and Education: 31 members,










XVI.


Committee on Legal Affairs: 25 members,










XVII.


Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs: 60 members,










XVIII.


Committee on Constitutional Affairs: 25 members,










XIX.


Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality: 37 members,










XX.


Committee on Petitions: 36 members,




Subcommittee on Human Rights: 30 members,
Subcommittee on Security and Defence: 30 members;












2.


Decides, with reference to the proposal from the Conference of Presidents of 12 January 2017 relating to the composition of committee bureaux, that the committee bureaux may consist of up to four vice-chairs;












3.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.






(1)  OJ C 482, 23.12.2016, p. 160.
Corrigendum to Directive 2011/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (OJ L 110, 29.4.2011)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EU Member State, codification of EU law, disclosure of information, merger, merger control, protection of shareholders, public limited company








L_2017014EN.01001701.xml










18.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 14/17







Corrigendum to Directive 2011/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 concerning mergers of public limited liability companies

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 110 of 29 April 2011
)


On page 2, in Article 1(1):
for:






‘—


Hungary:






—


részvénytársaság,’,








read:






‘—


Hungary:






—


nyilvánosan működő részvénytársaság,’;








for:






‘—


Malta:






—


kumpannija pubblika/public limited liability company, kumpannija privata/private limited liability company,’,








read:






‘—


Malta:






—


kumpannija pubblika ta' responsabbiltà limitata/public limited liability company,’.
Case C-427/15: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky — Czech Republic) — NEW WAVE CZ, a.s. v ALLTOYS, spol. s r. o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Directive 2004/48/EC — Proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right — Right of information — Request for information in proceedings — Proceedings linked to the action in which an infringement of an intellectual property right has been found)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, distributive trades, intellectual property, judicial proceedings, originating product, right to information








C_2017070EN.01000502.xml










6.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/5





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky — Czech Republic) — NEW WAVE CZ, a.s. v ALLTOYS, spol. s r. o.
(Case C-427/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Directive 2004/48/EC - Proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right - Right of information - Request for information in proceedings - Proceedings linked to the action in which an infringement of an intellectual property right has been found))
(2017/C 070/07)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: NEW WAVE CZ, a.s.

Defendant: ALLTOYS, spol. s r. o.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as applying to a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which, after the definitive termination of proceedings in which it was held that an intellectual property right was infringed, the applicant in separate proceedings seeks information on the origin and distribution networks of the goods or services by which that intellectual property right is infringed.


(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
Case T-407/16: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2017 — Banco Popular Español v EUIPO — Pledgeling (p) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, consultancy, donation, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, voluntary organisation








C_2017161EN.01003001.xml










22.5.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/30





Order of the General Court of 18 January 2017 — Banco Popular Español v EUIPO — Pledgeling (p)
(Case T-407/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 161/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Banco Popular Español, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pledgeling LLC (Houston, Texas, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2016 (Case R 1693/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Banco Popular Español, SA and Pledgeling LLC.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Banco Popular Español, SA shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.
Information relating to the provisional application of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, accession to the European Union, interim agreement (EU), protocol to an agreement, stabilisation and association agreement








L_2017014EN.01000101.xml










18.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 14/1







Information relating to the provisional application of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The Protocol shall be applied on a provisional basis as of 1 February 2017, in accordance with its Article 8(2).
Case C-623/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 — Toshiba Corp. v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, customer allocation and output limitation — Concept of ‘economic unit’ between two companies — Concept of ‘decisive influence’ — Joint control by two parent companies — Distortion of evidence)
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, electronic component, market-sharing agreement, price agreement, screen, television








C_2017070EN.01000701.xml










6.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/7





Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 — Toshiba Corp. v European Commission
(Case C-623/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors - Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, customer allocation and output limitation - Concept of ‘economic unit’ between two companies - Concept of ‘decisive influence’ - Joint control by two parent companies - Distortion of evidence))
(2017/C 070/10)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Toshiba Corp. (represented by: J.F. MacLennan, Solicitor, A. Schulz, Rechtsanwalt, J. Jourdan, avocat, and A. Kadri, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Toshiba Corp. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-01-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2017016EN.01000201.xml










18.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

17 January 2017
(2017/C 16/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0684 




JPY


Japanese yen


121,10 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4364 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86790 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5033 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0712 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,0360 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,021 




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,79 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3693 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5010 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,0560 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4162 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3953 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2860 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4877 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5168 




KRW


South Korean won


1 248,81 




ZAR


South African rand


14,3969 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3235 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5325 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 240,74 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7677 




PHP


Philippine peso


53,234 




RUB


Russian rouble


63,2426 




THB


Thai baht


37,731 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4305 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,0550 




INR


Indian rupee


72,6335 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.