do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (10711/2016 — C8-0332/2016 — 2016/0192(NLE))
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament
Subjects: Denmark, North Sea, Norway, Sweden, agreement (EU), fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing vessel, ratification of an agreement, ship's flag








C_2018238EN.01039601.xml










6.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/396





P8_TA(2016)0492
EU-Norway Agreement on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (10711/2016 — C8-0332/2016 — 2016/0192(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 238/23)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (10711/2016),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (11692/2014),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0332/2016),










—


having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 (1) on the draft Council decision,










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A8-0321/2016),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the Agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Kingdom of Norway.






(1)  Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0493.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2016/2381 of 14 December 2016 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/2/2016)
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: EU police mission, Mali, Sahel, peacekeeping








L_2016352EN.01005901.xml










23.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 352/59








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2016/2381
of 14 December 2016
         
extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/2/2016)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (1), and in particular Article 7(1) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/76 of 19 January 2015 launching the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) and amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP (2),

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the EUCAP Sahel Mali mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


On 26 May 2014, the PSC adopted Decision EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2014 (3), appointing Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 26 May 2014 to 14 January 2015.












(3)


The mandate of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali has been extended several times, most recently by PSC Decision (CFSP) 2016/938 (4), which extended his mandate as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali until 14 January 2017.












(4)


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed to extend the mandate of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2017 to 14 July 2017,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The mandate of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali is hereby extended until 14 July 2017.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 14 December 2016.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

W. STEVENS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21.

(2)  
            OJ L 13, 20.1.2015, p. 5.

(3)  Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2014 of 26 May 2014 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (OJ L 164, 3.6.2014, p. 43).

(4)  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2016/938 of 31 May 2016 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2016) (OJ L 155, 14.6.2016, p. 23).
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2016463EN.01000201.xml










13.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/2





Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(2016/C 463/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP (1) and in Annex Ia to Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (2) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/788/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 October 2017, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's next review, pursuant to Article 9 of Decision 2010/788/CFSP.
The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.


(1)  OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30.

(2)  OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 1.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 14 December 2016 in the case of Torbjørn Selstad Thue and the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (Case E-19/16)
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA, Norway, commuting, labour law, working time








C_2017133EN.01000301.xml










27.4.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 133/3





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 14 December 2016 in the case of Torbjørn Selstad Thue and the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security
(Case E-19/16)
(2017/C 133/03)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 14 December 2016 from Norges Høyesterett (the Supreme Court of Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 14 December 2016, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Torbjørn Selstad Thue and the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security on the following questions:






1.


Is the time spent on a journey ordered by the employer, to and/or from a place of attendance other than the employee’s fixed or habitual place of attendance, when such travel takes place outside normal working hours, to be considered working time within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC?










2.


Insofar as travel as described in Question I is not by itself sufficient to be classified as working time, what is the legal test and the relevant elements to be considered in the assessment of whether the time spent on travel should nonetheless be deemed to constitute working time? As part of this question, an opinion is requested on whether an intensity assessment should be made of the amount of work performed while travelling.










3.


Does it have any bearing on the assessments under Questions I and II how often the employer specifies a place of attendance other than the fixed or habitual one?
Case C-577/15 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2016 — SV Capital OÜ v European Banking Authority (EBA), European Commission (Appeal — Application to initiate an investigation into the Estonian and Finnish supervisory authorities — Decision of the European Banking Authority (EBA) — Board of Appeal decision of the European Supervisory Authorities — Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 — Articles 17 and 60 — Board of Appeal — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Excusable error)
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Estonia, Finland, bank, banking supervision, financial control, supervisory power








C_2017046EN.01000702.xml










13.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/7





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2016 — SV Capital OÜ v European Banking Authority (EBA), European Commission
(Case C-577/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Application to initiate an investigation into the Estonian and Finnish supervisory authorities - Decision of the European Banking Authority (EBA) - Board of Appeal decision of the European Supervisory Authorities - Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 - Articles 17 and 60 - Board of Appeal - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Excusable error))
(2017/C 046/09)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: SV Capital OÜ (represented by: M. Greinoman, vandeadvokaat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Banking Authority (EBA) (represented by: J. Overett Somnier and Z. Giotaki, acting as Agents, and F. Tuytschaever, advocaat), European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders SV Capital OÜ to bear its own costs and, in addition, to pay the costs incurred by the European Banking Authority (EBA);










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.
Case T-397/15: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2016 — PAL-Bullermann v EUIPO — Symaga (PAL) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark PAL — Partial revocation — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing from the registered mark — Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural machinery, fattening, poultry farming, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017030EN.01004401.xml










30.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/44





Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2016 — PAL-Bullermann v EUIPO — Symaga (PAL)
(Case T-397/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark PAL - Partial revocation - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing from the registered mark - Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
(2017/C 030/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: PAL-Bullermann GmbH (Friesoythe-Markhausen, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Symaga, SA (Villarta de San Juan, Spain) (represented by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 May 2015 (Case R 1626/2014-1) relating to revocation proceedings between PAL-Bullermann and Symaga.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders PAL-Bullermann GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1192/69 of the Council on common rules for the normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings (11197/1/2016 — C8-0424/2016 — 2013/0013(COD))
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, Committee on Transport and Tourism, European Parliament
Subjects: State aid, distribution business, provision of services, rail transport, standardised accounting system, transport company, transport infrastructure








C_2018238EN.01040301.xml










6.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/403





P8_TA(2016)0496
Normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings ***II
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1192/69 of the Council on common rules for the normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings (11197/1/2016 — C8-0424/2016 — 2013/0013(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)
(2018/C 238/26)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council position at first reading (11197/1/2016 — C8-0424/2016),










—


having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 11 July 2013 (1),










—


having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 8 October 2013 (2),










—


having regard to its position at first reading (3) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0026),










—


having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rule 76 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0368/2016),












1.


Approves the Council position at first reading;












2.


Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;












3.


Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;












4.


Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;












5.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  OJ C 327, 12.11.2013, p. 122.

(2)  OJ C 356, 5.12.2013, p. 92.

(3)  Texts adopted of 26.2.2014, P7_TA(2014)0152.
Case C-378/15: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Roma — Italy) — Mercedes Benz Italia SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate Direzione Provinciale Roma 3 (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(5), third subparagraph, point (d) — Scope — Application of a deductible proportion to the value added tax charged on the acquisition of all goods and services used by a taxable person — Incidental transactions — Use of turnover as an indicator)
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, goods and services, tax relief, turnover








C_2017046EN.01000501.xml










13.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/5





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Roma — Italy) — Mercedes Benz Italia SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate Direzione Provinciale Roma 3
(Case C-378/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 77/388/EEC - Article 17(5), third subparagraph, point (d) - Scope - Application of a deductible proportion to the value added tax charged on the acquisition of all goods and services used by a taxable person - Incidental transactions - Use of turnover as an indicator))
(2017/C 046/06)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria regionale di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Mercedes Benz Italia SpA

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate Direzione Provinciale Roma 3

Operative part of the judgment

Point (d) of the third subparagraph of Article 17(5) and Article 19 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, must be interpreted as not precluding national rules and practice, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which require a taxable person:






—


to apply to all goods and services which he has acquired a deductible proportion based on turnover, without providing for a method of calculation which is based on the nature and actual destination of each of the goods and services acquired and which objectively reflects the portion of the expenditure actually to be attributed to each of the taxed and untaxed activities; and










—


to refer to the composition of his turnover in order to identify transactions which may be classified as ‘incidental’, in so far as the assessment carried out for that purpose also takes account of the relationship between those transactions and the taxable activities of that taxable person and, as the case may be, of the use which they entail of the goods and services which are subject to value added tax.






(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8201 — Randstad Holding/Monster Worldwide) (Text with EEA relevance )
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, employment service, information technology industry, merger control, temporary employment agency








C_2016466EN.01000102.xml










14.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 466/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8201 — Randstad Holding/Monster Worldwide)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 466/02)
On 26 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8201. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador (07620/2016 — C8-0463/2016 — 2016/0092(NLE))
Date: 2016-12-14
Institutions: Committee on Development, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, accession to an agreement, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, trade agreement (EU), trade cooperation








C_2018238EN.01039501.xml










6.7.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/395





P8_TA(2016)0491
EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Ecuador)***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador (07620/2016 — C8-0463/2016 — 2016/0092(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 238/22)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (07620/2016),










—


having regard to the draft Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador (07621/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91, 100(2), 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0463/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0362/2016),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Colombia, Ecuador and Peru.