Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters
Date: 2016-11-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, European Regional Development Fund, aid to disaster victims, co-financing, financial aid, financing level, natural disaster, operational programme, terms for aid

EN 

   EN 

   EUROPEAN COMMISSION  Brussels, 30.11.2016  COM(2016) 778 final 2016/0384 (COD)   Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters  
 
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 

1. 

• 

CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 

Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 

The  recent  earthquakes  in  Italy  have  had  a  devastating  effect  on  the  people  living  in  the 
region.  Large  scale  reconstruction  works  will  be  required,  notably  to  restore  the  cultural 
heritage of the affected areas. Europe needs to be able to quickly provide additional, effective 
support  from  the  European  Regional  Development  Fund  (ERDF)  to  Member  States  and 
regions hit by major or regional natural disasters, complementing the means available under 
the European Union Solidarity Fund.  

In order to provide such additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters, 
the  Commission  proposes  to  introduce  the  possibility  of  a  separate  priority  axis  for 
reconstruction  operations  supported  by  the  ERDF  within  an  operational  programme.  Given 
the potential magnitude of the impact of such natural disasters, it is proposed to provide the 
possibility to finance such operations fully from the ERDF, without the need for national co-
financing. Operations to be financed within this priority axis are those linked to reconstruction 
in response to major or regional natural disasters as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 
2012/2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund. 

Specific provisions for the starting date of eligibility of expenditure are furthermore proposed 
to ensure that expenditure is eligible for reimbursement from the date of the disaster.  

• 

Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area 

The  proposal  is  consistent  with  the  overall  legal  framework  established  for  the  European 
Structural  and  Investment  Funds  (ESI)  Funds  and  is  limited  to  a  targeted  amendment  of 
Regulation  (EC)  1303/2013.  The  proposal  complements  the  type  of  support  available  under 
Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund.  

• 

Consistency with other Union policies 

The proposal is limited to a targeted amendment of Regulation (EC) 1303/2013 and maintains 
consistency with other Union policies.  

2. 

• 

LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY 

Legal basis 

It  is  proposed  to  introduce  an  additional  paragraph  in  Article  120  of  Regulation  (EU)  No 
1303/2013 to provide for the creation of a separate priority axis with a co-financing rate of up 
to  100%  to  support,  under  ERDF  investment  priorities,  operations  selected  by  managing 
authorities in response to major  or  regional disasters as  defined in  Council  Regulation (EC) 
No 2012/2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund.  

• 

Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)  

The proposal to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters 
by providing the possibility to finance reconstruction works by the ERDF with a co-financing 
rate  of  up  to  100%  from  the  EU  budget  requires  an  amendment  of  Regulation  (EU)  No 
1303/2013. The same result cannot be achieved through action at national level.  

EN 

2 

   EN 

• 

Proportionality 

The proposal is a limited and targeted change not going beyond what is necessary to achieve 
the  objective  of  providing  additional  assistance  to  Member  States  affected  by  natural 
disasters.  

3. 

•• 

N/A 

•• 

N/A 

•• 

N/A 

•• 

RESULTS 
CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS 

EX-POST 

EVALUATIONS, 

OF 

STAKEHOLDER 

Ex post-evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation 

Stakeholder consultations 

Collection and use of expertise 

Impact assessment 

An impact assessment has  been  carried out  to  prepare the proposal for Regulation  (EU) No 
1303/2013. This limited and targeted change does not require a separate impact assessment. 

Regulatory fitness and simplification 

• 

N/A 

•• 

Fundamental rights 

N/A 

4. 

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS 

The  proposed  modification  does  not  imply  any  changes  in  the  Multiannual  Financial 
Framework  annual  ceilings  for  commitments  and  payments  as  per  Annex  I  of  Regulation 
(EU) No 1311/2013. 

It remains within the limits of the overall allocation for the period 2014-2020 and is therefore 
budgetary  neutral.  The  increased  co-financing  rate  up  to  100%  will  lead  to  a  partial  front-
loading of payments, followed by lower payments at a later stage as the overall envelope is 
unchanged.  

5. 

• 

OTHER ELEMENTS 

Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements 

The implementation of the measure will be monitored and reported upon in the framework of 
the general reporting mechanisms established in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013.  

Explanatory documents (for directives) 

• 

N/A 

EN 

3 

   EN 

• 

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal 

In  order  to provide  additional assistance to  Member States affected by natural disasters, the 
possibility  of  introducing  a  separate  priority  axis  with  a  co-financing  rate  of  up  to  100% 
within an operational programme is proposed for the ERDF. The operations that may be co-
financed  under  this  separate  priority  axis  are  those  linked  to  reconstruction  in  response  to 
major  or  regional  natural  disasters  as  defined  in  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  2012/2002 
establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund.  

For  operations  under  this  separate  priority  axis,  a  derogation  to  the  rule  concerning  the 
starting  date  of  eligibility  of  expenditure  as  a  result  of  an  amendment  of  a  programme  is 
proposed.  This  would  ensure  that  following  the  amendment  of  the  programme  expenditure 
incurred as from the date of the disaster can be declared for reimbursement.  

A  provision  has  also  been  included  to  cover  the  case  of  expenditure  declared  for  measures 
taken  by  Member  State  authorities  directly  after  the  disaster  occurred,  and  before  the 
operational  programme  is  amended,  and  reimbursed  at  the  existing  co-financing  rate.  The 
higher co-financing rate would then be applied through the necessary adjustments to the next 
payment  application  and,  where  appropriate,  to  the  next  accounts,  once  the  programme  has 
been amended to include the separate priority axis.  

EN 

4 

   EN 

2016/0384 (COD) 

Proposal for a 

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL 

amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards specific measures to provide 
additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters 

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 

Having  regard  to  the  Treaty  on  the  Functioning  of  the  European  Union,  and  in  particular 
Article 177 thereof, 

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, 

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, 
After consulting the European Economic and Social Committee1,  
After consulting the Committee of the Regions2,  

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, 

Whereas: 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

1 
2 
3 

4 

In  order  to  provide  additional  assistance  to  Member  States  affected  by  natural 
disasters,  the  possibility  of  introducing  within  an  operational  programme  a  separate 
priority  axis  with  a  co-financing  rate  of  up  to  100  %  should  be  provided  under  the 
European  Regional  Development  Fund  ('ERDF')  investment  priorities,  set  out  in 
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council3.  

The  operations  that  may  be  co-financed  under  this  separate  priority  axis  are  those 
linked to reconstruction in response to major or regional natural disasters as defined in 
Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  2012/20024  establishing  the  European  Union  Solidarity 
Fund. 

For operations under the separate priority axis for natural disasters, a derogation to the 
general  rules  concerning  the  starting  date  of  eligibility  of  expenditure  in  relation  to 
expenditure that becomes eligible as a result of an amendment of a programme should 
be introduced to ensure the possibility to co-finance measures taken by Member State 
authorities directly after the disaster occurred and before the operational programme is 
amended.  

In  order  to  allow  for  the  eligibility  of  expenditure  incurred  and  paid  from  the  date 
when  the  natural  disaster  occurred,  even  if  this  is  before  the  entry  into  force  of  this 
Regulation,  the  corresponding  provision  on  the  starting  date  of  eligibility  of 
expenditure of beneficiaries should have retroactive effect.  

OJ C , , p. . 
OJ C , , p. . 
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on 
the  European  Regional  Development  Fund  and  on  specific  provisions  concerning  the  Investment  for 
growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 289). 
Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  2012/2002  of  11  November  2002  establishing  the  European  Union 
Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3). 

EN 

5 

   EN 

                                                 
(5) 

Therefore, Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 should be amended accordingly, 

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: 

Article 1 

In Article 120 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, the following paragraph is added.  

'8. A separate priority axis with a co-financing rate of up to 100 % may be established within 
an operational programme to support operations which fulfil the following conditions:  

a) the operations are selected by managing authorities in response to major or regional natural 
disasters as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002;  

b) the operations aim at reconstruction in response to the natural disaster; and 

c) the operations are supported under an ERDF investment priority. 

By way of derogation from Article 65(9), expenditure for operations under this  priority axis 
shall be eligible from the date when the natural disaster occurred. 

Where  expenditure  in  relation  to  operations  referred  to  in  the  first  subparagraph  has  been 
included in a payment application submitted to the Commission before the establishment of 
the separate priority axis, the Member State shall make the necessary adjustments to the next 
payment  application  and,  where  appropriate,  to  the  next  accounts  submitted  following  the 
adoption of the amendment to the programme.'    

Article 2 

Entry into force and application 

This regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in 
the Official Journal of the European Union. 

Article 1 shall apply from 1 January 2014. 

Done at Brussels, 

For the European Parliament 
The President 

For the Council 
The President 

EN 

6 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT 

1. 

NAME OF THE PROPOSAL: 

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending 
amending  Regulation  (EU)  N°  1303/2013  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the 
Council  as  regards  as  regards  specific  measures  to  provide  additional  assistance  to 
Member States affected by natural disasters. 

2. 

ABM / ABB FRAMEWORK 

Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities: 

Regional Policy; ABB activity 13.03 

3. 

3.1. 

BUDGET LINES 

Budget  lines  (operational  lines  and  related  technical  and  administrative 
assistance lines (ex- B.A lines)):  

The proposed new action will be implemented on the following budget lines: 

  13.036000 Less developed regions  (ERDF) 

  13.036100 Transition regions (ERDF) 

  13.036200 More developed regions (ERDF) 

  13.036300  Additional  allocation  for  outermost  and  sparsely  populated  regions 

(ERDF) 

  13.036401 European Territoral Cooperation (ERDF) 

3.2. 

Duration of the action and of the financial impact: 

The proposal remains within the limits of the overall allocation for the period 2014-2020 and 
is  therefore  budgetary  neutral.  The  increased  co-financing  rate  up  to  100%  will  lead  to  a 
partial front-loading of payments, followed by lower payments at a later stage as the overall 
envelope  is  unchanged.  It  is  assumed  that  the  impact  of  this  front-loading  would  be  over  a 
period of three years (2017-2019). 

EN 

7 

   EN 

3.3.  Budgetary characteristics: 

Budget 
line 

13.036000 

13.036100 

13.036200 

13.036300 

13.036401 

Type of expenditure 

New 

EFTA 
contribution 

Contributions 
from applicant 
countries 

Heading in 
financial 
perspective 

Non-
comp 

Non-
comp 

Non-
comp 

Non-
comp 

Non-
comp 

Diff 

NO 

NO 

Diff 

NO 

NO 

Diff 

NO 

NO 

Diff 

NO 

NO 

Diff 

NO 

NO 

NO 

NO 

NO 

NO 

NO 

No 1b 

No 1b 

No 1b 

No 1b 

No 1b 

4. 

SUMMARY OF RESOURCES 

4.1. 

Financial Resources 

4.1.1. 

Summary of commitment appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations (PA)  

The following  tables show the estimated impact of the proposed  measures  in 2017 to  2019. 
Since no new financial resources are proposed for commitment appropriations, no figures are 
inserted in the tables but n.a. (non-applicable) is indicated. The proposal is therefore in line 
with the multi-annual financial framework for 2014-2020.  

For  payments,  the  proposal  would  result  in  a  higher  rate  of  reimbursment  to  the  Member 
States concerned. Based on the total cost of the damage from natural disasters for the cases 
accepted  for  support  from  the  Solidarity  Fund  since  2014,  and  assuming  on  average  an 
additional co-financing rate of 25%, the impact in additional payments could be estimated at 
some 1.6bn, spread over the period 2017-2019. 

This  proposal  may  imply  an  acceleration  in  the  use  of  payment  appropriations  for  the 
programmes  concerned,  which  would  be  compensated  by  programme  closure,  leaving  the 
proposal as budgetary neutral. The total payment appropriations for the whole programming 
period remains unchanged. 

On the basis of the current estimates presented by Member States for payments in  2017 for 
Heading  1b,  it  is  considered  that  this  impact  could  be  covered  within  the  overall  budget 
approved for 2017. It will have to be taken into consideration when drafting the budgets for 
2018 and 2019 within the limits of the provisions of the MFF.  

EN 

8 

   EN 

 
Expenditure type 

Secti
on 
no. 

Year 
n 

n + 1 

n + 2 

n + 3 

n + 4 

n + 5 
and 
later 

Total 

EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 

Operational expenditure5  

Commitment 
Appropriations (CA) 

8.1 

Payment  Appropriations 
(PA) 

a 

b 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a 

+548 

+548 

 +548 

n.a 

-1644 

0. 

Administrative expenditure within reference amount6 

Technical 
& 
administrative  assistance 
(NDA) 

8.2.4 

c 

TOTAL REFERENCE AMOUNT 

Commitment 
Appropriations 

Payment 
Appropriations 

a+c 

b+c 

n.a.  

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

0,000 

Administrative expenditure not included in reference amount7 

Human 
associated 
(NDA) 

resources 

and 
expenditure 

Administrative  costs,  other 
than  human  resources  and 
associated 
not 
included in reference amount 
(NDA) 

costs, 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

8.2.5 

d 

8.2.6 

e 

Total indicative financial cost of intervention  

TOTAL  CA 
cost 
Resources 

of 

TOTAL  PA 
cost 
Resources 

of 

including 
Human 

including 
Human 

a+c
+d
+e 

b+c
+d
+e 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a 

n.a. 

n.a 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a 

5 
6 
7 

Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned 
Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx. 
Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05. 

EN 

9 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
Co-financing details 

Co-financing body 

…………………… 

TOTAL CA including co-
financing 

f 

a+c
+d+
e+f 

EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 

n + 1 

n + 2 

n + 3 

n + 4 

Year 
n 

n  +  5 
and 
later 

Total 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

4.1.2.  Compatibility with Financial Programming 

  Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming. 

Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial 

 
perspective. 

Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Interinstitutional 

 
Agreement8 (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the financial perspective). 

4.1.3.  Financial impact on Revenue 

 

 

Proposal has no financial implications on revenue 

Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows: 

Budget line 

Revenue 

EUR million (to one decimal place) 

Prior to 
action  
[Year 
n-1] 

  [Yea
r n] 

Situation following action 

[n+1]  [n+2]  [n+3

] 

[n+4]  [n+5]

9

a) Revenue in absolute terms 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

b) Change in revenue 

  

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

(Please  specify  each  revenue  budget  line  involved,  adding  the  appropriate 
number of rows to the table if there is an effect on more than one budget line.) 

8 
9 

See points 19 and 24 of the Inter-institutional agreement. 
Additional columns should be added if necessary i.e. if the duration of the action exceeds 6 years 

EN 

10 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
4.2. 

Human Resources FTE (including officials, temporary and external staff) – 
see detail under point 8.2.1. 

Annual requirements 

Year n 

n + 1 

n + 2 

n + 3 

n + 4 

n + 5 
and 
later 

Total  number  of  human 
resources 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

5. 

CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES 

5.1. 

Need to be met in the short or long term 

The recent earthquakes in Italy have had a devastating effect on the people living in the 
region. Large scale reconstruction works will be required notably to restore the cultural 
heritage. Europe needs to be able to quickly provide additional effective support from the 
European  Regional  Development  Fund  (ERDF)  to  Member  States  hit  by  major  or 
regional  natural  disasters,  complementing  the  means  available  under  the  European 
Solidarity Fund.  

5.2. 

Value-added  of  Community  involvement  and  coherence  of  the  proposal 
with other financial instruments and possible synergy 

The  proposal  will  allow  the  continuation  of  the  implementation  of  the  programmes, 
injecting  money  into  the  economy  while  at  the  same  time  help  reduce  the  burden  on 
public expenditure for Member States affected by natural disasters. 

5.3. 

Objectives,  expected  results  and  related  indicators  of  the  proposal  in  the 
context of the ABM framework 

The  objective  is  to  provide  additional  assistance  to  Member  States  affected  by  natural 
disasters, complementing the means available under the European Solidarity Fund. 

5.4.  Method of Implementation (indicative) 

Show below the method(s) chosen for the implementation of the action. 

 

6. 

With Member States 

MONITORING AND EVALUATION 

6.1.  Monitoring system 

Not  needed  as  it  falls  under  the  established  monitoring  of  European  Structural  and 
Investment Funds. 

EN 

11 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.2. 

Evaluation 

6.2.1.  Ex-ante evaluation 

N/A 

6.2.2.  Measures  taken  following  an  intermediate/ex-post  evaluation  (lessons  learned 

from similar experiences in the past) 

N/A 

6.2.3.  Terms and frequency of future evaluation 

N/A 

7. 

ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES  

N.A. 

EN 

12 

   EN 

8. 

DETAILS OF RESOURCES 

8.1. 

Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial cost 

(Headings of Objectives, 
actions and outputs should be 
provided) 

Type of 
output 

Av. 
cost 

Year n 

Year n+1 

Year n+2 

Year n+3 

Year n+4 

Year n+5 and 
later 

TOTAL 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

No. 
outputs 

Total 
cost 

Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 

OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 
No.1 Sustain the implementation 
of the operational programmes 

TOTAL COST 

0,000 

0,000 

0,000 

0,000 

0,000 

0,000 

EN 

13 

EN 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.2. 

Administrative Expenditure 

8.2.1.  Number and type of human resources 

Types of 
post 

Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing and/or additional 
resources (number of posts/FTEs) 

Year n 

Year n+1 

Year n+2 

Year n+3 

Year n+4 

Year n+5 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

Officials 
or 
temporary 
staff (XX 
01 01) 

A*/AD 

B*, 
C*/AST 

Staff financed by art. 
XX 01 02 

Other  staff  financed 
by art. XX 01 04/05 

TOTAL 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

8.2.2.  Description of tasks deriving from the action 

N/A 

8.2.3. 

Sources of human resources (statutory) 

(When  more  than  one  source  is  stated,  please  indicate  the  number  of  posts  originating 
from each of the sources) 

Posts  currently  allocated  to  the  management  of  the  programme  to  be 

 
replaced or extended 

 

 

Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n 

Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure 

Posts  to  be  redeployed  using  existing  resources  within  the  managing 

 
service (internal redeployment) 

Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise 

 
of the year in question 

EN 

14 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
8.2.4.  Other Administrative expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 – 

Expenditure on administrative management) 

EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 

Year 
n 

Year 
n+1 

Year 
n+2 

Year 
n+3 

Year 
n+4 

Year 
n+5  

and 
later 

TOTAL 

Budget line 

(number and heading) 

1  Technical and administrative 

assistance (including related staff 
costs) 

Executive agencies 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

Other technical and administrative 
assistance 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

- intra muros  

- extra muros 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

Total Technical and administrative 
assistance 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

8.2.5.  Financial  cost  of  human  resources  and  associated  costs  not  included  in  the 

reference amount 

EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 

Type of human resources 

Year n 

Year n+1  Year n+2  Year n+3  Year n+4 

Year n+5  

and later 

Officials  and  temporary  staff 
(XX 01 01) 

Staff financed by Art XX 01 02 
(auxiliary,  END,  contract  staff, 
etc.) 

(specify budget line) 

Total cost of Human 
Resources and associated 
costs (NOT in reference 
amount) 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

EN 

15 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Calculation– Officials and Temporary agents 

Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable 

n.a. 

Calculation– Staff financed under art. XX 01 02 

Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable 

n.a. 

8.2.6.  Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount 

EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 

Year 
n+1 

Year 
n+2 

Year 
n+3 

Year 
n+4 

Year 
n 

Year 
n+5 

and 
later 

TOTAL 

XX 01 02 11 01 – Missions 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees  

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

XX 01 02 11 05 - Information systems 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

 2  Total Other Management 
Expenditure (XX 01 02 11) 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

3  Other expenditure of an 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

administrative nature (specify 
including reference to budget line) 

Total Administrative expenditure, other 
than human resources and associated 
costs (NOT included in reference 
amount) 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

n.a. 

Calculation - Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount 

n.a. 

EN 

16 

   EN