do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-809/16: Action brought on 18 November 2016 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB
Date: 2016-11-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: aid to undertakings, bank, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_2017030EN.01004901.xml










30.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/49





Action brought on 18 November 2016 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB
(Case T-809/16)
(2017/C 030/56)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06 of 15 April 2016 (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06)’), as well as the decision of the Single Resolution Board SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13 of 20 May 2016 (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund supplementing the Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13)’), at least in so far as those decisions concern the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






—


First plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of a lack of (full) disclosure of the contested decisions.










—


Second plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the contested decisions.