do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-580/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 17 November 2016 — Firma Hans Bühler KG
Date: 2016-11-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, VAT, residence, tax collection, taxpayer








C_2017078EN.01000802.xml










13.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 17 November 2016 — Firma Hans Bühler KG
(Case C-580/16)
(2017/C 078/12)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Firma Hans Bühler KG

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 141(c) of Directive 2006/112, (1) on which the non-application of Article 41(1) of Directive 2006/112 depends, in accordance with Article 42 (in conjunction with Article 197) of Directive 2006/112, to be interpreted as meaning that the requirement laid down in that provision is not met where the taxable person is resident and identified for VAT purposes in the Member State from which the goods are dispatched or transported, even if that taxable person uses the VAT identification number of another Member State for that specific intra-Community acquisition?










2.


Are Articles 42 und 265 in conjunction with Article 263 of Directive 2006/112 to be interpreted as meaning that only the submission in due time of the recapitulative statement renders Article 41(1) of Directive 2006/112 inapplicable?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
Reorganisation measures — Decision on measures to reorganise ‘International Life General Insurance SA’ (Publication made in accordance with Article 271 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II))
Date: 2016-11-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU control, Greece, insurance company, liquidation








C_2016422EN.01000501.xml










17.11.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 422/5





Reorganisation measures
Decision on measures to reorganise ‘International Life General Insurance SA’
(Publication made in accordance with Article 271 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II))
(2016/C 422/04)






Insurance undertaking


‘International Life General Insurance SA’, with its registered office at Kifisias 7 & Neapoleos 2, 15123 Marousi, General Commercial Register (GEMI) No 000314501000, Tax Identification Number (TIN) 094130304, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) 213800NED3OUL1K2V349




Date, nature of the decision and date of entry into force


Decision No 202/2/19.9.2016 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece concerning:






(1)


the assignment to the Insurance Administrator, Mr Ioannis Peristeris, of the administration of the insurance undertaking, in replacement of the Board of Directors;










(2)


the maintenance in force of the measures under Decision 193/1/27.7.2016 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece.




Entry into force: As of the adoption date (19.9.2016)
End of validity: Not defined




Competent authorities


Bank of Greece
Address:





E. Venizelou 21




102 50 Athens




GREECE








Supervisory authorities


Bank of Greece
Address:





E. Venizelou 21




102 50 Athens




GREECE








Administrator appointed


Ioannis Peristeris, father’s name Dimitrios




Applicable law


Greek law in accordance with the provisions of Articles 223, 224, 225 and 229 of Law 4364/2016.
Action brought on 17 November 2016 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-17/16)
Date: 2016-11-17
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA, Iceland, agricultural machinery, infringement procedure (EU), pesticide, safety standard, technical standard








C_2017009EN.01003901.xml










12.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/39





Action brought on 17 November 2016 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland
(Case E-17/16)
(2017/C 9/09)
An action against Iceland was brought before the EFTA Court on 17 November 2016 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Carsten Zatschler and Marlene Lie Hakkebo, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, 35 Rue Belliard, B-1040 Brussels.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority requests the EFTA Court to:






1.


Declare that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 1c of Chapter XXIV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/127/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 amending Directive 2006/42/EC with regard to machinery for pesticide application) as adapted by way of Protocol 1 thereto and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed, or in any event by failing to inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority thereof.










2.


Order Iceland to bear the costs of these proceedings.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:







—


The application addresses Iceland’s failure to comply, no later than 9 April 2016, with a reasoned opinion delivered by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 9 February 2016 regarding that State’s failure to implement into its national legal order Directive 2009/127/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 amending Directive 2006/42/EC with regard to machinery for pesticide application, as referred to at point 1c of Chapter XXIV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and as adapted to that Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto (‘the Act’).










—


The EFTA Surveillance Authority submits that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.