do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-468/15 P P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH, Sasol Germany GmbH (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1138/2011 and (EU) No 1241/2012 — Imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2(10)(i) — Adjustment — Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis — First subparagraph of Article 2(10) — Symmetry between the normal value and the export price — Principle of sound administration)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: India, Indonesia, Malaysia, anti-dumping duty, chemical alcohol, commission agent, equal treatment, export price, import (EU)








C_2017006EN.01002201.xml










9.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 6/22





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH, Sasol Germany GmbH
(Case C-468/15 P P) (1)

((Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1138/2011 and (EU) No 1241/2012 - Imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 2(10)(i) - Adjustment - Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis - First subparagraph of Article 2(10) - Symmetry between the normal value and the export price - Principle of sound administration))
(2017/C 006/26)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) (represented by: D. Luff, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, and by N. Tuominen, avocate), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and M. França, Agents), Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH, Sasol Germany GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.
Case T-154/15: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Jaber v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court — New measures including the applicant's name on the lists — Action for annulment — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Content of the application — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, ownership, right of establishment, trade restriction








C_2016462EN.01001801.xml










12.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/18





Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Jaber v Council
(Case T-154/15) (1)

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court - New measures including the applicant's name on the lists - Action for annulment - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Content of the application - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Burden of proof - Right to property - Freedom to conduct a business))
(2016/C 462/21)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Aiman Jaber (Lattakia, Syria) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2015/117/CFSP of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 85), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 2), in so far as the name of the applicant is included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Mr Aiman Jaber to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and during the proceedings for an interim order.






(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
Joined Cases C-568/14 to C-570/14: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — Ismael Fernández Oliva v Caixabank SA (C-568/14), Jordi Carné Hidalgo, Anna Aracil Gracia v Catalunya Banc SA (C-569/14), Nuria Robirosa Carrera, César Romera Navales v Banco Popular Español SA (C-570/14) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Contracts concluded between sellers or suppliers and consumers — Mortgage contracts — ‘Floor’ clause — Collective proceedings — Individual action with the same subject matter — Interim relief)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil procedure, consumer protection, interest, mortgage, unfair terms of contract








C_2017063EN.01000402.xml










27.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/4





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — Ismael Fernández Oliva v Caixabank SA (C-568/14), Jordi Carné Hidalgo, Anna Aracil Gracia v Catalunya Banc SA (C-569/14), Nuria Robirosa Carrera, César Romera Navales v Banco Popular Español SA (C-570/14)
(Joined Cases C-568/14 to C-570/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Contracts concluded between sellers or suppliers and consumers - Mortgage contracts - ‘Floor’ clause - Collective proceedings - Individual action with the same subject matter - Interim relief))
(2017/C 063/06)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 3 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Ismael Fernández Oliva (C-568/14), Jordi Carné Hidalgo, Anna Aracil Gracia (C-569/14), Nuria Robirosa Carrera, César Romera Navales (C-570/14)

Defendants: Caixabank SA (C-568/14), Catalunya Banc SA (C-569/14), Banco Popular Español SA (C-570/14)

Operative part of the order

Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not permit a court seised of an individual action brought by a consumer seeking a declaration that a term of a contract binding him to a seller or supplier is unfair to adopt interim relief of its own motion, for as long as it considers appropriate, pending a final judgment in an ongoing collective action, the outcome of which may be applied to the individual action, when such relief is necessary in order to ensure the full effectiveness of the judgment to be given on the existence of the rights claimed by the consumer under Directive 93/13.


(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8015 — Synthos/Ineos Styrenics) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2016394EN.01000102.xml










26.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 394/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8015 — Synthos/Ineos Styrenics)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 394/02)
On 26 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8015. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-455/15: Order of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Vitra Collections v EUIPO — Consorzio Origini (Shape of a chair) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017014EN.01003301.xml










16.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 14/33






Order of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Vitra Collections v EUIPO — Consorzio Origini (Shape of a chair)
(Case T-455/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 014/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Vitra Collections AG (Muttenz, Switzerland) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented: initially by P. Bullock, subsequently by D. Hanf and finally by D. Hanf and S. Bonne, acting as agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Consorzio Origini per l’Internazionalizzazione (Florence, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2015 (Case R 664/2011-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Consorzio Origini and Vitra Collections AG.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Vitra Collections AG and Consorzio Origini per l’Internazionalizzazione shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  
            OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.
Notice to economic operators — New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: CCT duties, agricultural product, common customs tariff, import (EU), industrial product, suspension of customs duties








C_2016394EN.01000601.xml










26.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 394/6





Notice to economic operators — New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products
(2016/C 394/05)
Economic operators are informed that the Commission has received requests in accordance with the administrative arrangements foreseen in the Commission communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas (2011/C 363/02) (1) for the July round of 2017.
The list of the products for which a duty suspension is requested is now available on the Commission’s thematic (Europa) website on the customs union (2).
Economic operators are also informed that the deadline for objections against new requests to reach the Commission, via the national administrations, is 16 December 2016 which is the date of the second scheduled meeting of the Economic Tariff Questions Group.
Interested operators are advised to consult the list regularly in order to be informed on the status of the requests.
More information on the autonomous tariff suspension procedure can be found on the Europa website:
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/suspensions/index_en.htm


(1)  OJ C 363, 13.12.2011, p. 6.

(2)  http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/susp/susp_home.jsp?Lang=en
Case T-155/15: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Kaddour v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court — New measures including the applicant's name on the lists — Action for annulment — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Content of the application — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, ownership, right of establishment, trade restriction








C_2016462EN.01001802.xml










12.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/18





Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Kaddour v Council
(Case T-155/15) (1)

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court - New measures including the applicant's name on the lists - Action for annulment - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Content of the application - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Burden of proof - Right to property - Freedom to conduct a business))
(2016/C 462/22)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Khaled Kaddour (Damascus, Syria) (represented: initially by A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz, M. Ponsard, lawyers, V. Davies, Solicitor, and T. Eicke, QC, then by V. Davies, T. Eicke and V. Wilkinson, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2015/117/CFSP of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 85), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 2), in so far as the name of the applicant is included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Mr Khaled Kaddour to bear his own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and the proceedings for an interim order.






(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8105 — Marmedsa/UECC/UECC Ibérica) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, logistics, maritime transport, merger control








C_2016394EN.01000101.xml










26.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 394/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8105 — Marmedsa/UECC/UECC Ibérica)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 394/01)
On 18 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8105. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Joined Cases C-10/16 to C-12/16: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova, Italy) — Ignazio Messina & C. SpA v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Decision to refer — Insufficient information regarding the legal and factual context — Insufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving a dispute in the main proceedings — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: international transport, intra-EU transport, payment, ports policy, vessel








C_2017063EN.01000901.xml










27.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/9





Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova, Italy) — Ignazio Messina & C. SpA v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)
(Joined Cases C-10/16 to C-12/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Decision to refer - Insufficient information regarding the legal and factual context - Insufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving a dispute in the main proceedings - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2017/C 063/13)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ignazio Messina & C. SpA

Defendants: Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)

Operative part of the order

The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Provincial Tax Court, Genoa, Italy), by decisions of 11 December 2015, are manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
Case C-482/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — Westermann Lernspielverlage GmbH, formerly Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark application — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘bambino’ and ‘lük’ — Opposition proceedings — Earlier EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘bambino’ — Partial refusal of registration — Revocation of the earlier mark on which the opposition was based — Letter from the applicant informing the General Court of that revocation — Refusal of the General Court to add that letter to the case file — Failure to state reasons)
Date: 2016-10-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, right to justice, rights of the defence, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2017006EN.01002202.xml










9.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 6/22





Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — Westermann Lernspielverlage GmbH, formerly Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
(Case C-482/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark application - Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘bambino’ and ‘lük’ - Opposition proceedings - Earlier EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘bambino’ - Partial refusal of registration - Revocation of the earlier mark on which the opposition was based - Letter from the applicant informing the General Court of that revocation - Refusal of the General Court to add that letter to the case file - Failure to state reasons))
(2017/C 006/27)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Westermann Lernspielverlage GmbH, formerly Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Westermann Lernspielverlage GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.