REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION Synthesis Report on the Quality of Drinking Water in the Union examining Member States' reports for the 2011-2013 period, foreseen under Article 13(5) of Directive 98/83/EC
Date: 2016-10-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, consumer protection, drinking water, human nutrition, quality standard, water analysis, water protection, water supply

EUROPEAN 
COMMISSION 

Brussels, 20.10.2016  
COM(2016) 666 final 

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION 

Synthesis Report on the Quality of Drinking Water in the Union examining Member 
States' reports for the 2011-2013 period, foreseen under Article 13(5) of Directive 
98/83/EC 

EN 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
  
 
SYNTHESIS REPORT ON THE QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER IN THE UNION 
EXAMINING MEMBER STATES' REPORTS FOR THE 2011-2013 PERIOD, 
FORESEEN UNDER ARTICLE 13(5) OF DIRECTIVE 98/83/EC 

1. 

INTRODUCTION 

The Directive 
The  Drinking  Water  Directive1  (DWD)  aims  to  ensure  that  water  intended  for  human 
consumption  is  safe.  The  Directive  requires  that  drinking  water  must  be  free  of  any 
microorganisms,  parasite  or  substance  that  could  potentially  endanger  human  health  by 
setting standards for the most common potentially harmful organisms and substances that can 
be found in drinking water.  

The Report 

Member States are obliged under the Drinking Water Directive to monitor on a regular basis 
the quality of the drinking water that is supplied to consumers. They have to report triennially 
the  monitoring  results  to  the  Commission.  This  synthesis  report  gives  a  summary  of  the 
drinking  water  quality  in  EU  Member  States  in  2011-2013.  It  fulfils  the  obligation  of  the 
Commission under Article 13(5) of the DWD to examine the Member States' reports and to 
publish every three years a synthesis report on the quality of drinking water in the EU. The 
information  provided  in  this  report  covers  all  Member  States  except  one:  Croatia  was 
exempted from the current reporting obligation, as it joined the EU in mid-2013, which was 
close  to  the  end  of  this  reporting  period.  This  report  is  independent  from  a  Staff  Working 
Document  on  the  REFIT  evaluation  of  the  DWD  which  will  be  adopted  during  the  last 
semester of 2016.  

The  Directive  makes  a  distinction  between  large  and  small  water  supplies.  Large  water 
supplies  provide  either  more  than  1,000  m³  drinking  water  per  day  as  an  average  or  serve 
more than 5,000 persons. The minimum water quality requirements are equal for both large 
and  small  supplies,  but  the  reporting  obligations  apply  only  to  large  supplies.  Accordingly, 
this synthesis report summarises the drinking water quality in large supplies.  

Nevertheless, during the data collection exercise, 15 Member States (BE, BG, CY, ES, FR, 
GR, HU, IE, LU, MT, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK) provided on a voluntary basis also information on 
small  water  supply  zones  (supplying  less  than  1,000m³/day).  An  overall  EU  assessment  of 
compliance  in  small  supplies  was  not  considered  meaningful  as  the  data  available  was  not 
fully  representative  for  the  entire  EU  and  therefore  this  information  is  not  included  in  the 
present report. According to the information provided by these 15 Member States the overall 
compliance  is  on  average  98%  high  and  no  major  problems  are  indicated.  However,  the 
Commission  considers  that  additional  information  is  needed  to  get  a  better  picture  of  the 

1 Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption, OJ 
L 330, 5.12.1998 

2 

 
 
 
                                                            
exact  situation  and  will  therefore  look  into  this  further.  Where  Member  States  provided 
information on small supplies, this information is summarised at the end of the each country 
sheet. Country sheets providing more detailed information per Member State are available on 
the Commission's DG Environment website2. Links to national drinking water reports (2011-
2013) on national webpages are listed in Annex I to this report.  

Drinking water quality parameters  

The  Directive  sets  standards  for  the  most  common  potentially  harmful  organisms  and 
substances  that  can  be  found  in  drinking  water.  A  total  of  48  essential  parameters  must  be 
monitored  and  tested  regularly.  The  Directive  distinguishes  three  groups  of  parameters: 
microbiological parameters, chemical parameters and indicator parameters (detailed in Annex 
I of the Directive). 

The  two  microbiological  parameters  Escherichia  coli  and  Enterococci  have  a  parametric 
value  that  is  a  substitute  for  zero.  In  other  words,  these  organisms  should  be  absent  from 
drinking water to guarantee its quality and safety.  

The  chemical  parameters  have  been  selected  for  their  potential  impact  on  human  health. 
Chemicals  are,  besides  accidents,  almost  never  present  in  drinking  water  in  concentrations 
that cause acute health effects. Chemicals include trace elements, like arsenic, nickel or lead, 
other substances like cyanide or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon or nitrogen components – 
nitrate and nitrite. The impact of chemicals depends on the exceedance level, the duration of 
exposure, and on the way they affect the human body. Mostly the parametric values are based 
on lifelong exposure and an average drinking water intake of two litres per person per day.   

The  indicator  parameters  concern  parameters  that  have  indirect  relevance  to  the  quality  of 
water: they serve to indicate that something has changed in the source water, the treatment or 
the distribution of the water. When an exceedance in this group of parameters is observed, the 
situation  needs  to  be  further  investigated  and  to  be  adjusted.  Even  though  most  indicator 
parameters do not pose a direct threat to human health, they might impact indirectly the water 
quality  through  the  appearance,  taste  or  odour  of  the  water  (and  hence  influence  the 
acceptability by the consumer) or they might interfere with proper treatment e.g. inadequate 
disinfection because of the presence of organic matter.  

The  monitoring  requirements  have  been  recently  updated  by  an  amendment  of  Annexes  II 
and III of the Directive to scientific and technical progress3. This amendment has introduced 
a  voluntary  use  of  a  risk-based  approach  to  extend  monitoring,  to  reduce  frequency  or  to 
remove parameters on the basis of the results of a risk assessment.   It entered into force on 
27th  October  2015  and  has  to  be  transposed  into  national  legislation  within  a  period  of  24 
months by the Member States. 

2 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-drink/reporting_en.html 
3 Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 amending Annexes II and III to Council Directive 
98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption 

3 

 
 
                                                            
2. 

RESULTS AT EU LEVEL 

General information 

In  the  EU,  drinking  water  is  abstracted  from  different  sources.  Overall,  main  sources  in 
Member States are groundwater and surface water (e.g. drinking water dams), accounting for 
respectively some 50 % and 36 % of our drinking water supply (Figure 1).  

Figure 1 

Sources for drinking water in the EU (2011 to 2013) 

The distribution of water sources in Member States is shown in Figure 2. 

Figure 2 

Sources for drinking water in Member States (2011 to 2013) 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
*In CZ, inland water is synonymous with surface water   

In the EU, no official statistical data is collected about how many people are connected to the 
public  water  supply.  Figure  3  shows  the  percentage  of  resident  population  served  by  large 
water supply zones (>1,000m³/day and/or supplying more than 5,000 people).  

Figure 3 

Resident population in large water supply zones in Member States (2011 
to 2013) 

5 

 
 
 
 
 
0

10

20

30

Resident population [%]
40
60
50

70

80

90

100

NL
LU
MT
GR
UK
SK
BE
DE
PT
SE
ES
FI
FR
BG
CY
CZ
IE
SI
PL
AT
IT
EE
DK
LV
HU
LT
RO

The Netherlands and Luxembourg serve 100 % of their resident population by large supplies. 
A considerable part of EU population not served by large supplies is served by small supplies 
which  have  to  comply  with  the  requirements  of  the  Directive.  Considering  both  large  and 
small supplies,  Malta, Slovakia, Portugal, France, Bulgaria and Hungary, reach also 100 % 
resident population and  most other Member States reach most of the  population  apart from 
Romania where only 66% of the population is served by both supplies. As only 15 Member 
States reported on small water supplies, this additional information is not displayed in Figure 
3.  

Drinking water quality - Compliance 

To assess drinking water quality in a water supply zone, a very large number of analyses have 
been  carried  out  within  the  2011-2013  reporting  period  in  Member  States:  4.1  million  on 
microbiological parameters, 7.1 million on chemical parameters and 17.5 million on indicator 
parameters. 

For each parameter, information on compliance was available. The percentage of compliance 
reflects the ratio of the number of samples analysed and the number of exceedances observed. 
If  at  least  99 %  of  all  analyses  done  in  a  given  year  meet  the  given  standard,  the  Member 

6 

 
 
 
 
 
State  is  considered  to  be  compliant  with  the  Directive  for  the  parameter  concerned. 
Exceedances  of  indicator  parameters  do  not  necessarily  mean  a  non-compliance  with  the 
Directive  because  of  the  above-mentioned  reasons  (if  there  is  no  direct  threat  to  human 
health). 

Figure 4 shows the  percentage of compliance for the  different parameter groups in the EU. 
The results show high compliance of over 99 % for microbiological and chemical parameters. 
The  presence  of  the  two  microbiological  parameters  E.coli  and  enterococci  in  a  drinking 
water sample may indicate that contamination may have occurred either at a water source or 
within the water distribution network. Any detection of E. coli or enterococci in a drinking 
water sample is seen as an exceedance. Indicator parameters (except colour, odour, taste and 
turbidity) reach almost 99% of compliance in the reporting years 2011 to 2013. 

Figure 4 

Percentage  of  compliance  for  the  parameter  groups  microbiological 
parameters,  chemical  parameters  and  indicator  parameters  for  the 
reporting period 2011-2013 in the EU 

97,0

97,5

98,0

Microbiological
parameters

Chemical parameters

Indicator parameters

% compliance with the Directive
100,0

99,0

99,5

98,5

2011

2012

2013

Figure 5 shows the information on compliance for the individual chemical parameters in the 
EU.  

Figure 5 

Compliance rates for the chemical parameters in the EU (2011-2013)4 

4 Abbreviations in Figure 5: T= Total, I= Individual  

7 

 
 
 
   
 
 
                                                            
Arsenic  shows,  in  contrast  to  nearly  all  other  parameters,  the  lowest  compliance  rate  with 
98.83 %. This relatively lower compliance rate (but still higher than 98,8 %) is mainly caused 
by  catchment  characteristics  and  is  due  to  geological  background  concentration  that  can  be 
found in Hungary or Italy for example.  

Figure  6  shows  the  information  on  exceedances  for  individual  indicator  parameters.  The 
figure  just  gives  an  overview  of  the  exceedances  and  does  not  reflect  non-compliance  with 
the Directive, because a number of indicator parameters do not have a numeric value, such as 
colour,  taste,  odour,  or  turbidity.  Nevertheless,  parameters  that  most  frequently  showed 
exceedances in this indicator parameter group are total organic carbon (TOC) and iron. TOC, 
alone is not harmful. It represents an indirect measure of organic molecules present in water 
measured as carbon. It is an indicator of the health and safety of source water and distribution 
system  water  quality,  and  has  a  link  to  disinfection  byproducts.  Upon  its  reaction  with  a 
disinfectant  it  can  produce  harmful  byproducts.  TOC  is  also  important  for  optimizing  and 
thereby  reducing  costs  associated  with  a  treatment  process.  The  issue  of  naturally 
iron/manganese-bearing  water  is  that  the  dissolved  iron  and  manganese  are  oxidized  and 
change from colorless, dissolved forms to colored, solid forms. 

Figure 6 

Compliance rates for the indicator parameters in the EU (2011-2013). 

8 

 
 
 
 
 
95,0

95,5

96,0

96,5

97,0

97,5

98,0

98,5

99,0

99,5

100,0

compliance [%]

Oxidisability

Conductivity

pH

Clostridium

Aluminium

Ammonium

Sodium

ColonyCount

Chloride

Coliforms

Manganese

Sulphate

Iron

Total Organic Carbon

9 

 
 
 
 
Box 1 Pesticides in drinking water 

The DWD sets a concentration limit of 0.1μg/l for individual pesticides, and of 0.5μg/l for the total 
sum  of  pesticides.  Member  States  monitor  a  considerable  number  of  pesticides  and  metabolites 
(degradation  and  reaction  products)  in  drinking  water  that  are  chosen  at  national  level  and  are  thus 
specific for each Member State. However, only those pesticides that are likely to be present in a given 
supply need to be monitored. For reporting purposes a short list of 13 pesticides was agreed between 
European Commission and Member States. For these, monitoring frequency and information on non-
compliance  were  reported  for  2011-2013.  Even  though  the  reporting  of  pesticides’  short  list  is  a 
harmonized  approach  and  comparable,  it  does  not  show  the  full  picture  of  all  pesticides  and  all 
relevant metabolites occurring in a country. 

The following figure shows the percentage of large water supply zones monitored for occurrence and 
exceedance of pesticides of the short list in the EU during the 2011-2013 reporting period.  

The  low  monitoring  values  (mean  27.4%)  illustrate  that  the  monitoring  approach  foreseen  in  the 
DWD does not allow a comprehensive EU assessment of pesticide contamination in drinking water, 
although the reported compliance rates are consistently high (total of more than 99.9%, see Figure 5). 
Based  on  a  survey  carried  out  in  the  Member  States,  the  Commission  has  made  an  updated  list  of 
pesticides and metabolites of concern available, for consideration in monitoring programmes5. 

5 https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/309b29d1-b8f8-4809-a044-6a9cca1cbabf 

10 

 
 
 
  
                                                            
Causes of non-compliance  

The  Drinking  Water  Directive  requires  Member  States  to  report  the  causes  and  remedial 
actions for non-compliances detected in a water supply zone. The causes of exceedances are 
classified  in  the  reporting  formats  as  "catchment  related",  "treatment  related"  and 
"distribution related" (public network and domestic network). 

Figure 7 shows the number of number of analyses that caused exceedances for main parameters. 
During  the  2011-2013  reporting  period,  the  most  exceedances  were  reported  for  coliform 
bacteria,  followed  by  Iron,  total  organic  carbon,  and  ammonium.  Most  of  these  parameters 
are indicator parameters without direct threat to human health. 

Figure 7 

Number  of  analyses  that  caused  exceedances  for  the  parameters  of  the 
Drinking Water Directive in the EU (2011-2013). 

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Number of analyses

Coliform
Iron
Total Organic Carbon
Ammonium
ColonyCount
Manganese
E.coli
pH
Enterococci
Chloride
Sulphate
Aluminium
Clostridium
Arsenic
Nitrite
Lead
Conductivity
Fluoride
Nitrite tap
Sodium
Nickel
Nitrate/Nitrite formula

Figure  8  shows  the  different  causes  for  the  most  reported  parameters.  While  causes  for 
exceedances  due  to  biological  parameters  (coliform  bacteria,  colony  count,  E-coli, 
Enterococci, Clostridium) and iron cannot be exactly specified, exceedances of ammonium, 
manganese,  pH,  chloride,  sulphate,  arsenic  and  nitrite  are  mainly  catchment  related.  Total 
organic  carbon  and  aluminium  are  mainly  treatment  related,  whereas  lead  is  clearly 
associated with problems in domestic distribution network. 

Figure 8 

Causes of non-compliance for the most reported parameters 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Country comparison 

Non-compliance  of  parameter  groups  is  presented  in  Table  1  at  national  level  in  Member 
States. The assessment is based on the mean compliance rate for each parameter group of the 
years 2011 to 2013.  

Table 1 

Compliance rates at national level in the Member States (2011-2013) 

Country 

Microbiological parameters  Chemical parameters 

Indicator parameters* 

AT 

BE 

BG 

CY 

CZ 

DE 

DK 

EE 

ES 

FI 

FR 

GR 

99,84 

99,75 

99,25 

99,01 

99,91 

99,88 

99,80 

99,99 

99,62 

100,00 

99,84 

99,64 

99,9 

99,9 

99,5 

99,9 

99,9 

99,9 

99,8 

99,8 

99,8 

99,9 

99,8 

99,9 

99,6 

99,1 

99,3 

96,3 

99,2 

99,7 

98,6 

99,1 

99,4 

99,6 

99,4 

99,5 

12 

 
 
 
 
 
Country 

Microbiological parameters  Chemical parameters 

Indicator parameters* 

HU 

IE 

IT 

LT 

LU 

LV 

MT 

NL 

PL 

PT 

RO 

SE 

SI 

SK 

UK 

99,71 

99,97 

99,20 

100,00 

99,77 

99,92 

100,00 

99,97 

100,00 

99,57 

99,69 

99,94 

99,25 

99,52 

99,98 

98,6 

99,5 

99,6 

99,3 

100,0 

100,0 

99,9 

100,0 

100,0 

99,9 

99,7 

100,0 

100,0 

100,0 

99,9 

99-100% rate of compliance 
98-100% rate of compliance 
< 98% rate of compliance 

*except odour, taste, colour and turbidity 

97,1 

99,3 

99,6 

99,0 

99,5 

98,7 

90,1 

100,0 

99,8 

99,3 

99,2 

99,1 

98,7 

99,4 

99,9 

As  regards  the  microbiological  parameters,  all  Member  States  reported  between  99-100 % 
rate  of  compliance.  Concerning  the  chemical  parameters,  26  Member  States  reported 
compliance of between 99-100 %, and only Hungary reported compliance just below 99 %. 
For the indicator parameters, three Member States had a compliance rate between 98 % and 
100 %, three Member States show a compliance rate of less than 98 % and 21 Member States 
reached a compliance level of over 99 %. For indicator parameters, Malta reported a rather 
low  mean  compliance  rate  of  90.1 %  because  of  very  low  compliance  rates  on  chloride. 
Overall no major differences between Member States have been observed.  

Figure 9 shows the percentage of the different types of remedial actions taken (for example 
source  measures,  source  replacement,  repair,  cleaning,  and  disinfection).  The  actions  are 
displayed in pie charts for three important parameters coliform bacteria, arsenic, and lead.  

Figure 9 

Percentage  of  remedial  actions  for  selected  water  quality  parameters  in 
Europe (2011-2013) 

Coliform bacteria 

Arsenic 

Lead 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(C=catchment; D=domestic distribution network; E=emergency; P=public distribution network; T=treatment) 

(C=catchment; D=domestic distribution network; E=emergency; P=public distribution network; T=treatment)
C1
C2

Action(s) to terminate or mitigate the cause
Action(s) to replace source

N
O  Others

None Required

D1

D2

E

Replacement, disconnection or repair of defective 
components

Cleaning, scouring and/or disinfecting 
contaminated components

P1

P2

Replacement, disconnection or repair of defective 
components

Cleaning, scouring and/or disinfecting contaminated 
components

Notification of and instructions to consumers e.g., 
prohibition of use, boil water order, temporary 
limitations on consumption.

T

Establishing, upgrading or improving treatment

For  coliform  bacteria  contaminations  detected,  the  majority  of  the  remedial  actions  taken 
(67 %)  were  related  to  the  public  distribution  network  or  treatment  infrastructure  and 
operation (i.e through better disinfection). Remedial actions to minimise high concentrations 
of arsenic in drinking water were mostly related to treatment (46 %) or catchment (29 %). In 
the  case  concentration  of  lead  exceeds  the  parametric  value,  67 %  of  all  reported  remedial 
actions  consisted  of  the  replacement  or  disconnection  of  lead  pipes  in  the  domestic 
distribution network. 

To  summarize,  it  can  be  noted  that  problems  in  relation  to  specific  drinking  water  quality 
parameters or groups of parameters find their cause at different points of the drinking water 
supply  chain:  water  source,  treatment,  distribution  and  end  of  pipe  -  the  consumer.  This 
suggests  that  useful  monitoring  programmes  should  be  set  up  considering  these  different 
causes of non-compliance at different points, with the aim to take prompt remedial action to 
maintain a healthy supply of drinking water in Europe. 

The  choice  of  the  means  and  measures  to  deliver  compliance  is  left  to  the  Member  States, 
because  they  should  understand  best  the  local  water  quality  situation  and  can  provide 
appropriate answers to local real problem. However, when continuing non-compliance due to 
structural problems is observed, and remedial action was not sufficient to restore the quality 
of drinking water, the Commission can take action on a potential case of violation of Union 
law. The Commission attempts to quickly resolve the underlying problem with the Member 
State concerned by means of a structured dialogue, and if the Member State concerned fails 
to  implement  a  solution  to  rectify  the  suspected  violation  of  EU  law,  the  Commission  may 

14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
launch  a  formal  infringement  procedure.  Due  to  the  overall  high  compliance  this  has  been 
necessary in only a few cases so far. 

3. 

CONCLUSION  

This  synthesis  report  shows  that  compliance  rates  for  parameters  directly  reflecting  the 
quality of the drinking water supplied to consumers reached with one exemption at least 99 % 
for  the  first  time  in  all  Member  States  during  the  2011-2013  reporting  period.  This  is  a 
positive  achievement  that  reflects  the  efforts  made  by  all  concerned  for  the  correct 
implementation of the Drinking Water Directive.  

At the time of publication of this report, a detailed Evaluation Report on the DWD6 is being 
drafted, which assesses inter alia also the reporting system. In parallel, a Fitness Check of EU 
environmental monitoring and reporting7 is being carried out. Both these initiatives are likely 
to  include  further  conclusions  and  follow-up  to  improve  the  reporting  process  under  the 
Drinking Water Directive.  

6 Reference to be included when ready 
7 Reference to be included when ready 

15 

 
 
                                                            
Annex I: Links to national drinking water reports and information (2011-2013). 

MS  Member State (MS) report location 
AT  http://bmg.gv.at/home/Schwerpunkte/VerbraucherInnengesundheit/Lebensmittel/Trinkwasser/ 
BE  http://www.leefmilieu.brussels/themas/water 
BG  http://eea.government.bg/bg/output/soe-report/index.html 
CY  http://www.moh.gov.cy/moh/mphs/phs.nsf/DMLwater2_archive_gr?OpenForm&Start=1&Count=1000&

Expand=1&Seq=1 

CZ  http://www.szu.cz/tema/zivotni-prostredi/pitna-voda 
DE  http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/wasser/trinkwasser/trinkwasserqualitaet 
DK  http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/dwd/envvnnugw/National%20report%20on%20drinking%20water%202

011-2013.pdf/manage_document 

http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/dwd/envvlix7g/ 

EE  http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/dwd/refvlizg/ 
ES  http://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/saludAmbLaboral/calidadAguas/publicaciones.htm 
FI 
FR  http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_qualite_eau_du_robinet_2012_DGS.pdf  
GR  www.moh.gov.gr 
HU  http://oki.antsz.hu/files/dokumentumtar/Ivovizminoseg2011.pdf 
IE  www.epa.ie 
IT 
LT  http://vmvt.lt/maisto-sauga/kontrole/valstybine-maisto-kontrole/geriamojo-vandens-kontrole 
LU  http://www.eau.public.lu/publications/index.html 
LV  http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/dwd/envvpbw_w/ 
MT  http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/dwd/envvowj9q/index_html?&page=3 
NL  https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2014/12/08/de-kwaliteit-van-het-drinkwater-in-

http://www.cheacquabeviamo.it/main.htm 

nederland-in-2013 

PL  http://www.gis.gov.pl/?lang=pl&go=content&id=30 
PT  http://www.ersar.pt/website/ViewContent.aspx?SubFolderPath=%5cRoot%5cContents%5cSitio%5cMen
uPrincipal%5cDocumentacao%5cPublicacoesIRAR&Section=MenuPrincipal&FolderPath=%5cRoot%5c
Contents%5cSitio%5cMenuPrincipal%5cDocumentacao&BookTypeID=3&BookCategoryID=1 

RO  https://www.insp.gov.ro/cnmrmc/images/rapoarte/Raport-sintetic-2013.pdf 
SE  www.livsmedelsverket.se 
SI 
SK  http://www.uvzsr.sk/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=156&Itemid=65 
UK  http://www.dwi.gov.uk/  

http://www.mpv.si/porocila 

16