do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament decision of 13 September 2016 on the nomination of Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0190/2016 — 2016/0807(NLE))
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2018204EN.01021401.xml










13.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 204/214





P8_TA(2016)0328
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors — Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou
European Parliament decision of 13 September 2016 on the nomination of Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0190/2016 — 2016/0807(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 204/29)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0190/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0258/2016),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 5 September 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Case T-146/15: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — hyphen v EUIPO — Skylotec (Representation of a polygon) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a polygon — Genuine use of a mark — Second subparagraph of Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing in components which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark)
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2016392EN.01003301.xml










24.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 392/33





Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — hyphen v EUIPO — Skylotec (Representation of a polygon)
(Case T-146/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark representing a polygon - Genuine use of a mark - Second subparagraph of Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing in components which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark))
(2016/C 392/41)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: hyphen GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail and M. Hoffmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Skylotec GmbH (Neuwied, Germany) (represented by: M. De Zorti and M. Helfrich, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2015 (Case R 1506/2014-4), concerning revocation proceedings between Skylotec and hyphen.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 March 2015 (Case R 1506/2014-4), concerning revocation proceedings between Skylotec GmbH and hyphen GmbH in so far as the Board of Appeal found, with respect to goods in Classes 9 and 25 within the meaning of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purpose of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, that the proprietor of the registered European Union trade mark should have its rights revoked.










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder.










3.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by hyphen.










4.


Orders Skylotec to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.
Case T-384/15: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — EDF Luminus v Parliament (Arbitration clause — Electricity supply contract CNT (2009) N° 137 — Payment by the Parliament of the regional contribution made by the applicant to the Brussels-Capital Region and calculated on the basis of the power made available to the Parliament — No contractual obligation — No obligation under national law)
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Brussels region, contract terms, electrical energy, electricity supply, interest, price of energy, regional aid, supplies contract








C_2016402EN.01004402.xml










31.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/44





Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — EDF Luminus v Parliament
(Case T-384/15) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Electricity supply contract CNT (2009) No 137 - Payment by the Parliament of the regional contribution made by the applicant to the Brussels-Capital Region and calculated on the basis of the power made available to the Parliament - No contractual obligation - No obligation under national law))
(2016/C 402/52)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: EDF Luminus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Verhoeven and O. Vanden Berghe, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and P. Biström, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and I. Martínez del Peral, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 272 TFEU seeking an order for the Parliament to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 439 672,95, plus interest, being the amount of the regional contribution paid by the applicant to the Brussels-Capital Region and calculated on the basis of the power made available to the Parliament.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


The Parliament’s claim for a declaratory judgment is dismissed.










3.


EDF Luminus shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Parliament.










4.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs






(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Case C-564/14 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Raffinerie Heide GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 — Decision 2011/278/EU — National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany — Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances — Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ — Implementing powers of the Commission)
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU emission allowance, Germany, environmental protection, greenhouse gas, national implementing measure, tradeable emission permit








C_2016454EN.01000701.xml










5.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 454/7






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Raffinerie Heide GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-564/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany - Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances - Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ - Implementing powers of the Commission))
(2016/C 454/14)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Raffinerie Heide GmbH (represented by: U. Karpenstein and C. Eckart, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes, E. White and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Raffinerie Heide GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 33, 2.2.2015.
Case T-648/16: Action brought on 13 September 2016 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (BOBO cornet)
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016402EN.01005601.xml










31.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/56





Action brought on 13 September 2016 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (BOBO cornet)
(Case T-648/16)
(2016/C 402/66)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Şehitkamil Gaziantep, Turkey) (represented by: T. Tsenova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elka Zaharieva (Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BOBO cornet’– Application for registration No 12 299 343

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2016 in Case R 906/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Articles 75 and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-565/14 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Romonta GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 — Decision 2011/278/EU — National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany — Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances — Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ — Implementing powers of the Commission)
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU emission allowance, Germany, environmental protection, greenhouse gas, national implementing measure, tradeable emission permit








C_2016454EN.01000702.xml










5.12.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 454/7






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Romonta GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-565/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany - Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances - Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ - Implementing powers of the Commission))
(2016/C 454/15)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Romonta GmbH (represented by: I. Zenke and M.-Y. Vollmer, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Romonta GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1666 of 13 September 2016 establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union waters of VIII and IX by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
Date: 2016-09-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Belgium, EU waters, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2016249EN.01002701.xml










16.9.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 249/27








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2016/1666
of 13 September 2016
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union waters of VIII and IX by vessels flying the flag of Belgium


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 (2) lays down quotas for 2016.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2016.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2016 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 September 2016.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

João AGUIAR MACHADO
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 of 22 January 2016 fixing for 2016 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/104 (OJ L 22, 28.1.2016, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


24/TQ72




Member State


Belgium




Stock


SRX/89-C.




Species


Skates and rays (rajiformes)





Zone


Union waters of VIII and IX




Closing date


20.8.2016