do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-480/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Amedei (For you)
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016402EN.01005001.xml










31.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/50





Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Amedei (For you)
(Case T-480/16)
(2016/C 402/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Berger, M. Wolter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Amedei Srl (Pontedera, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘For you’ — Application for registration No 12 267 571

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2016 in Case R 851/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and reject Opposition No B 2 342 452 filed against the EUTM application No 12 267 571;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings;










—


order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-479/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016383EN.01002202.xml










17.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 383/22





Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
(Case T-479/16)
(2016/C 383/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, A. Stolz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘AROMASENSATIONS’ — Application for registration No 14 198 824

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 2482/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismisses the appeal insofar as it is based on Article 7(1)(b);










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of principles of equal treatment and sound administration.
Case T-619/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Sicignano v EUIPO — Inprodi (GiCapri ‘a giacchett’e capri’)
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, clothing, electronic commerce, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, registered trade mark, retail selling, trade-mark law, wholesale selling








C_2016392EN.01004501.xml










24.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 392/45





Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Sicignano v EUIPO — Inprodi (GiCapri ‘a giacchett’e capri’)
(Case T-619/16)
(2016/C 392/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Pasquale Sicignano (Santa Maria la Cairtà, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bucarelli and G. Petrocchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Inghirami Produzione Distribuzione SpA (Inprodi) (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘GiCapri “a giacchett'e capri”’ — Application for registration No 12 512 778

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2016 in Case R 806/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO delivered on 2 June 2016 in Case R 806/2015-5 dismissing application No 12512778 for registration of the composite mark GiCapri ‘a Giacchett’e capri’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 35, which should therefore be granted;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016315EN.01000101.xml










30.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

29 August 2016
(2016/C 315/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1170 




JPY


Japanese yen


114,24 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4451 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85476 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4940 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0937 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,2731 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,023 




HUF


Hungarian forint


308,76 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3314 




RON


Romanian leu


4,4576 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,3048 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4790 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4536 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6637 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5438 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5212 




KRW


South Korean won


1 254,70 




ZAR


South African rand


16,2300 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4608 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4852 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 819,24 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5183 




PHP


Philippine peso


51,829 




RUB


Russian rouble


72,6695 




THB


Thai baht


38,647 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,6710 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,7643 




INR


Indian rupee


75,0335 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-511/15: Order of the General Court of 30 August 2016 — Fontem Holdings 4 v EUIPO (BLU ECIGS) (European Union trade mark — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic equipment, registered trade mark, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_2016402EN.01004501.xml










31.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/45





Order of the General Court of 30 August 2016 — Fontem Holdings 4 v EUIPO (BLU ECIGS)
(Case T-511/15) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 402/53)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Fontem Holdings 4 BV (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) (represented initially by A. Poulter, and subsequently by A. Dykes and D. Stone, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2015 (Case R 2697/2014-4), concerning an application for registration.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Fontem Holdings 4 BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8171 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/TREZZO) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, real estate business, storage








C_2016315EN.01000201.xml










30.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/2





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8171 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/TREZZO)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 315/02)






1.


On 22 August 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings SEGRO plc (‘SEGRO’, United Kingdom) and Public Sector Pension Investment Board (‘PSPIB’, Canada) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, through SEGRO European Logistics Partnership SARL (‘SELP’, Luxembourg), joint control over an income producing logistics asset in Italy, Trezzo, by way of purchase of assets.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for SEGRO: ownership, asset management and development of modern warehousing, light industrial and data centre properties,
—   for PSPIB: managing a diversified global portfolio composed of investments in public financial markets, private equity, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources and private debt,
—   for TREZZO: logistics warehouse asset located in the industrial area of Trezzo on the outskirts of Milan in Italy.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8171 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/TREZZO, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-620/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic)
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, carriage of goods, packaging, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2016402EN.01005101.xml










31.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/51





Action brought on 30 August 2016 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic)
(Case T-620/16)
(2016/C 402/60)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: The Logistical Approach BV (Uden, the Netherlands) (represented by: R. Milchior, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Idea Groupe (Montoir de Bretagne, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘Idealogistic’– Application for registration No 12 318 234

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20/06/2016 in Case R 1435/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


principally, annul the contested decision;










—


alternatively, amend the contested decision in that it wrongly confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the registration of the mark 012318234 for the services ‘Consultancy in the field of logistics, including route selection, storage facilities and selection of means of transport’;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-476/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ministarstvo pomorstva, prometa i infrastrukture — Uprava zračnog prometa, elektroničkih komunikacija i pošte (Croatia) lodged on 30 August 2016 — Hrvatska agencija za civilno zrakoplovstvo v Air Serbia A.D. Beograd, and Dane Kondič, direktor Air Serbia A.D. Beograd
Date: 2016-08-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, Serbia, airline, carriage of passengers, ticket








C_2016419EN.01003102.xml










14.11.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 419/31





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ministarstvo pomorstva, prometa i infrastrukture — Uprava zračnog prometa, elektroničkih komunikacija i pošte (Croatia) lodged on 30 August 2016 — Hrvatska agencija za civilno zrakoplovstvo v Air Serbia A.D. Beograd, and Dane Kondič, direktor Air Serbia A.D. Beograd
(Case C-476/16)
(2016/C 419/41)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Ministarstvo pomorstva, prometa i infrastrukture — Uprava zračnog prometa, elektroničkih komunikacija i pošte

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Hrvatska agencija za civilno zrakoplovstvo

Defendant: Air Serbia A.D. Beograd, and Dane Kondič, direktor Air Serbia A.D. Beograd

Question referred

Is the practice of an airline of a signatory to the Multilateral Agreement on the Establishment of a European common aviation area (ECAA) which consists in providing commercial air transportation services departing from one of the Member States of the European Union, via its country of origin as a transfer point where passengers and their luggage are transhipped to another aircraft belonging to the same company, and travelling to a Member State of the European Union or a third country on the basis of an autonomous transport ticket which indicates two different flight numbers consistent with the interpretation of EU law in general and with the interpretation of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of Protocol VI included in Annex V of the ECAA in particular?