do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1408 of 12 August 2016 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Steirische Käferbohne (PDO))
Date: 2016-08-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Austria, Styria, designation of origin, labelling, leguminous vegetable, product designation








L_2016229EN.01000301.xml










24.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 229/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1408
of 12 August 2016
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Steirische Käferbohne (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Austria's application to register the name ‘Steirische Käferbohne’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Steirische Käferbohne’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Steirische Käferbohne’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 August 2016.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Violeta BULC
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 127, 9.4.2016, p. 9.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case F-42/16: Action brought on 12 August 2016 — ZZ v EIB
Date: 2016-08-12
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, indemnification, staff regulations (EU), supplementary pension








C_2016371EN.01003001.xml










10.10.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 371/30





Action brought on 12 August 2016 — ZZ v EIB
(Case F-42/16)
(2016/C 371/33)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the application for compensation made by the applicant in respect of the harm which he alleges he has suffered since November 2013.

Form of order sought







(1)


Order the EIB to pay the applicant a sum equal to eight times his annual salary on the basis of Article 33a of the Staff Regulations and Article 9.1.1 of the Administrative provisions applicable to the staff;










(2)


Annul the decision of the EIB of 4 June 2015 closing the applicant’s Optional Supplementary Provident Scheme (OSPS) account with effect from 28 February 2015 and order the EIB to pay the applicant:






—


a sum equivalent to the payments which the EIB would have continued to make into the applicant’s OSPS account (3 % of the applicant’s annual salary) if the EIB had not closed his account, with effect from 28 February 2015 until the date of actual reopening of the applicant’s OSPS account;










—


the interest which the capital in the applicant’s OSPS account would have continued to earn if his OSPS account had not been closed on 28 February 2015 and if the applicant and the EIB had been able to continue to make their respective payments up to 3 % of the applicant’s annual salary until the date of actual reopening of the applicant’s OSPS account;














(3)


Order the EIB to pay damages assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 as compensation for the non-pecuniary damage suffered;










(4)


Order the EIB to pay the costs.