do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-567/14: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2016 — Group v EUIPO — ILIEV (GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL — Earlier, non-registered national figurative marks GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL — Relative ground for refusal — Application of national law — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence establishing the content of the national right — Rule 19(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Failure to take account of evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, travel agency








C_2016305EN.01002901.xml










22.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/29





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2016 — Group v EUIPO — ILIEV (GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL)
(Case T-567/14) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union figurative mark GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL - Earlier, non-registered national figurative marks GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL - Relative ground for refusal - Application of national law - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence establishing the content of the national right - Rule 19(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Failure to take account of evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2016/C 305/39)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: Group OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: D. Dragiev and A. Andreev, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, P. Ivanov and D. Botis, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Kosta Iliev (Sofia) (represented by: S. Ganeva, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2014 (Case R 1587/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Group OOD and Mr Iliev.

Operative part of the order







1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2014 (Case R 1587/2013-4).










2.


Orders EUIPO and Mr Kosta Iliev to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Group OOD.






(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.
Special Report No 11/2016 — ‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’
Date: 2016-06-29
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, North Macedonia, administrative reform, approximation of laws, corruption, pre-accession strategy, public administration, public contract, transport infrastructure








C_2016235EN.01000601.xml










29.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/6





Special Report No 11/2016
‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’
(2016/C 235/06)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 11/2016 ‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016235EN.01000501.xml










29.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2016
(2016/C 235/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1073 




JPY


Japanese yen


113,40 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4386 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82720 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4425 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0845 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3785 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,108 




HUF


Hungarian forint


317,67 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4413 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5247 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2201 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4984 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4438 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5925 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5671 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5006 




KRW


South Korean won


1 294,19 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8831 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3606 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5150 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 595,53 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5077 




PHP


Philippine peso


52,150 




RUB


Russian rouble


71,6883 




THB


Thai baht


39,062 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,7183 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,9827 




INR


Indian rupee


75,2070 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-362/16: Action brought on 29 June 2016 — Tillotts Pharma v EUIPO — Ferring (XENASA)
Date: 2016-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016314EN.01003201.xml










29.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/32





Action brought on 29 June 2016 — Tillotts Pharma v EUIPO — Ferring (XENASA)
(Case T-362/16)
(2016/C 314/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Tillotts Pharma AG (Rheinfelden, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferring BV (Hoofddorp, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘XENASA’ — Application for registration No 11 920 055

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2016 in Case R 3264/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8057 — Cinven/CPPIB/Hotelbeds Group) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, tourism








C_2016235EN.01000401.xml










29.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8057 — Cinven/CPPIB/Hotelbeds Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 235/04)
On 21 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8057. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.