do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/994 of 20 June 2016 repealing Common Position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Liberia, arms control, economic sanctions, import restriction, international sanctions








L_2016162EN.01002101.xml










21.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 162/21








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/994
of 20 June 2016
         
repealing Common Position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 12 February 2008, the Council adopted Common Position 2008/109/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Liberia that provided for an arms embargo.












(2)


On 25 May 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted UNSCR 2288 (2016) with regard to Liberia, terminating, with immediate effect, the measures on arms previously set out in paragraph 2 of UNSCR 1521 (2003) and modified by paragraphs 1 and 2 of UNSCR 1683 (2006), by paragraph 1(b) of UNSCR 1731 (2006), by paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of UNSCR 1903 (2009), by paragraph 3 of UNSCR 1961 (2010) and by paragraph 2(b) of UNSCR 2128 (2013).












(3)


Common Position 2008/109/CFSP should therefore be repealed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Common Position 2008/109/CFSP is repealed.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Luxembourg, 20 June 2016.


For the Council


The President

F. MOGHERINI
            





(1)  Council Common Position 2008/109/CFSP of 12 February 2008 concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia (OJ L 38, 13.2.2008, p. 26).
Council Regulation (EU) 2016/983 of 20 June 2016 repealing Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Liberia
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Liberia, arms control, economic sanctions, international sanctions, precious stones, trade restriction, wood product








L_2016162EN.01000101.xml










21.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 162/1








            COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2016/983
of 20 June 2016
         
repealing Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Liberia


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/994 of 20 June 2016 repealing Common Position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia (1),


Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and of the European Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


On 25 May 2016, the United Nations Security Council, by Resolution 2288 (2016), decided to terminate, with immediate effect, the arms embargo with regard to the situation in Liberia.












(2)


On 20 June 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/994 repealing Common position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia.












(3)


Regulatory action at Union level is necessary,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Council Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 (2) is repealed.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Luxembourg, 20 June 2016.


For the Council


The President

F. MOGHERINI
            





(1)  See page 21 of this Official Journal.

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 of 10 February 2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Liberia and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1030/2003 (OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 1).
Case C-343/16 P: Appeal brought on 20 June 2016 by Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz e.V. and Horst Giesen against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 14 June 2016 in Case T-595/15, Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz e.V. and Horst Giesen v European Commission
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: anti-discriminatory measure, drafting of EU law, equality before the law, freedom of association, non-profit organisation








C_2017053EN.01002001.xml










20.2.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/20





Appeal brought on 20 June 2016 by Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz e.V. and Horst Giesen against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 14 June 2016 in Case T-595/15, Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz e.V. and Horst Giesen v European Commission
(Case C-343/16 P)
(2017/C 053/24)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellants: Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz e.V. and Horst Giesen (represented by: Dr. P. Brockmann, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 12 January 2017 the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case T-326/16: Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel v EUIPO — Tiertafel Deutschland (Tafel)
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aid to disadvantaged groups, basic needs, registered trade mark, social services, trade-mark law








C_2016287EN.01003201.xml










8.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/32





Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel v EUIPO — Tiertafel Deutschland (Tafel)
(Case T-326/16)
(2016/C 287/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel e.V. (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Koerl, E. Celenk and S. Vollmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tiertafel Deutschland e.V. (Rathenow, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Tafel’ — EU trade mark No 8 985 541

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2016 in Case R 248/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-334/16 P: Appeal brought on 20 June 2016 by FN, FP, and FQ against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 April 2016 in Case F-41/15 DISS II FN and Others v CEPOL
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, equal treatment, indemnification, reassignment, servant (EU), termination of employment








C_2016305EN.01004501.xml










22.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/45





Appeal brought on 20 June 2016 by FN, FP, and FQ against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 April 2016 in Case F-41/15 DISS II FN and Others v CEPOL
(Case T-334/16 P)
(2016/C 305/61)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: FN (Budapest, Hungary), FP (Bratislava, Slovakia), FQ (Les Fonts Benitachell, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Police College (CEPOL)

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellants claim that the Court should:






—


annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 April [2016] in Case F-41/15 DISS II, FN e.a. v CEPOL, and as a consequence,










—


annul the CEPOL decision no 17/2014/DIR dated 23 May 2014, providing for the relocation of CEPOL in Budapest, Hungary, as from 1st October 2014 and informing the appellants that ‘Non compliance with this instruction will be considered as resignation with the effect of 30 September 2014’,










—


annul the CEPOL decisions dated 28 November 2014, rejecting the appellants’ complaints lodged between 8 and 21 August 2014, against the decision of 23 May 2014,










—


order CEPOL to compensate the material and moral prejudices suffered by the appellants,










—


order CEPOL to bear the costs of the appellants related to the present appeal and in case F-41/15 DISS II.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging an error in law in the application of article 47 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging an error in law in the interpretation of the contractual provisions binding the appellants and CEPOL and of the appellants’ acquired rights, a distortion of the facts, a violation of the duty duty to state reasons, a violation of the principle of equal treatment, and an error in law in the application of the principle of good administration and due care.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging an error in law in the appreciation of the appellants’ claims for damages.
Case T-312/16: Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Walfood v EUIPO — Romanov Holding (CHATKA)
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, catering industry, deep-frozen product, fresh fish, mollusc, preserved product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016305EN.01004201.xml










22.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/42





Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Walfood v EUIPO — Romanov Holding (CHATKA)
(Case T-312/16)
(2016/C 305/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Walfood SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. Cornu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Romanov Holding, SL (La Moraleja, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ‘CHATKA’ — International registration designating the European Union No 876 349

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2016 in Case R 2870/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-40/16: Order of the President of the Court of 20 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Irene Uhden v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines N.V.
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air traffic control, air transport, carriage of passengers, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2016326EN.01002002.xml










5.9.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/20





Order of the President of the Court of 20 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Irene Uhden v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines N.V.
(Case C-40/16) (1)

(2016/C 326/36)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.
Case T-315/16: Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Butterfly)
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, clothing, electronic component, game of chance, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2016287EN.01002901.xml










8.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/29





Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Butterfly)
(Case T-315/16)
(2016/C 287/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH (Moers, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Butterfly’

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2016 in Case R 221/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Alter the contested decision to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and EU trade mark application No 011757549 is rejected;










—


order the other party to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-581/15: Order of the President of the Court of 20 June 2016 — European Commission v Czech Republic
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, access to a profession, access to information, administrative cooperation, carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, infringement of EU law, professional qualifications, recognition of diplomas, road transport








C_2016326EN.01002001.xml










5.9.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/20





Order of the President of the Court of 20 June 2016 — European Commission v Czech Republic
(Case C-581/15) (1)

(2016/C 326/35)
Language of the case: Czech
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/988 of 20 June 2016 determining the quantities to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2016 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 in the pigmeat sector
Date: 2016-06-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: common organisation of markets, import (EU), import licence, pigmeat, tariff quota








L_2016162EN.01000801.xml










21.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 162/8








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/988
of 20 June 2016
         
determining the quantities to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2016 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 in the pigmeat sector


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 188(2) and (3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (2) opened annual tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The quotas listed in Part B of Annex I to that Regulation are managed using the simultaneous examination method.












(2)


The quantities covered by import licence applications lodged from 1 to 7 June 2016 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2016 are smaller than those available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod.












(3)


In order to ensure the efficient management of the measure, this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The quantities for which import licence applications have not been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 442/2009, to be added to the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2016, are set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 2016.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 of 27 May 2009 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas in the pigmeat sector (OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13).




ANNEX






Order No


Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantities available for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2016
(kg)




09.4038


8 516 250 




09.4170


1 230 500 




09.4204


1 156 000