do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-39/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2016 — Marinozzi v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposals concerning additional pensionable years — Act not having an adverse effect — Inadmissibility of the action — Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case — Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure)
Date: 2016-06-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: retirement conditions, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_2016410EN.01004001.xml










7.11.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 410/40





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2016 — Marinozzi v Commission
(Case F-39/15) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposals concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))
(2016/C 410/71)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gabrio Marinozzi (Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, then G. Gattinara, Agent, and, lastly, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the proposal to transfer the applicant’s pension rights to the EU pension scheme which applies the new general implementing provisions (GIP) of 3 March 2011 for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Mr Gabrio Marinozzi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 178, 1/6/2015, p. 27.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7858 — INEOS/Celanese Assets) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-06-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2016214EN.01000101.xml










15.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7858 — INEOS/Celanese Assets)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 214/01)
On 11 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7858. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case F-75/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2016 — Wille and Skovsboell v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposals concerning additional pensionable years — Act not having an adverse effect — Inadmissibility of the action — Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case — Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure)
Date: 2016-06-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, retirement conditions, transfer of pension rights








C_2016410EN.01003802.xml










7.11.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 410/38





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2016 — Wille and Skovsboell v Commission
(Case F-75/12) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposals concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))
(2016/C 410/69)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Daniel Wille (Mouscron, Belgium) and Bo Skovsboell (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, subsequently J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and, lastly, J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Baquero Cruz and D. Martin, Agents, then J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, subsequently G. Gattinara, Agent and, lastly, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision calculating the amount of the pension rights acquired prior to entering the service of the Commission to be credited and the rejection of the complaints brought by the applicants.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Mr Daniel Wille and Mr Bo Skovsboell shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 287, 22/9/2012, p. 41.
Case T-332/16: Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360°)
Date: 2016-06-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dental medicine, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2016296EN.01003202.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/32





Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360o)
(Case T-332/16)
(2016/C 296/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘360o’ — Application for registration No 14 042 162

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2016 in Case R 2288/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-333/16: Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360°)
Date: 2016-06-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dental medicine, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2016296EN.01003301.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/33





Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360o)
(Case T-333/16)
(2016/C 296/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘360o’ — Application for registration No 14 042 188

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2016 in Case R 2287/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2016-06-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, medical plant, seed, texture agent








C_2016214EN.01002202.xml










15.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/22





Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(2016/C 214/06)
Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 69, in the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1211 90 86 Other’ the following text is inserted between point 5 and the last sentence:







‘6.


Seed husks of Psyllium (Plantago ovata) in the form of heterogeneous fragments, obtained by threshing.’





On page 71, the following text is inserted between the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1302 20 10 and 1302 20 90 Pectic substances, pectinates and pectates’ and the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1302 31 00 Agar-agar’:








‘1302 31 00 


to


1302 39 00 




Mucilages and thickeners, whether or not modified, derived from vegetable products

As long as a product either swells in cold water or dissolves in hot water, the mentioned criteria of the HS Explanatory Note to heading 1302 , (C), first paragraph, are fulfilled.’






On page 71, in the Explanatory Note to CN subheading ‘1302 39 00 Other’ the following text is inserted after point 4:







‘5.


Hydrocolloids extracted from seed husks of Psyllium (Plantago ovata).’






(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.