do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12594/2014 — C8-0180/2015 — 2014/0234(NLE))
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Colombia, Croatia, Peru, accession to the European Union, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, trade agreement (EU)








C_2018086EN.01014901.xml










6.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/149





P8_TA(2016)0240
EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Croatia) ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12594/2014 — C8-0180/2015 — 2014/0234(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 086/23)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (12594/2014),










—


having regard to the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12595/2014),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91, 100(2), 207 and Article 218 (6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0180/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0155/2016),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the additional protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru.
European Parliament decision of 7 June 2016 on the nomination of Rimantas Šadžius as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0126/2016 — 2016/0805(NLE))
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2018086EN.01015401.xml










6.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/154





P8_TA(2016)0245
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Rimantas Šadžius
European Parliament decision of 7 June 2016 on the nomination of Rimantas Šadžius as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0126/2016 — 2016/0805(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 086/28)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0126/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0183/2016),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 23 May 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Rimantas Šadžius as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Case C-155/15: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm — Migrationsöverdomstolen — Sweden) — George Karim v Migrationsverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national — Article 18 — Taking back an asylum seeker whose application is being examined — Article 19 — Cessation of responsibility — Absence from the territory of the Member States for a period of at least three months — New procedure for determining the Member State responsible — Article 27 — Remedy — Extent of judicial review)
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, EU migration policy, Schengen Agreement, foreign national, right of asylum








C_2016296EN.01001401.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/14





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm — Migrationsöverdomstolen — Sweden) — George Karim v Migrationsverket
(Case C-155/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 - Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national - Article 18 - Taking back an asylum seeker whose application is being examined - Article 19 - Cessation of responsibility - Absence from the territory of the Member States for a period of at least three months - New procedure for determining the Member State responsible - Article 27 - Remedy - Extent of judicial review))
(2016/C 296/18)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Kammarrätten i Stockholm — Migrationsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: George Karim

Defendant: Migrationsverket

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 19(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person must be interpreted to the effect that that provision, in particular its second subparagraph, is applicable to a third-country national who, after having made a first asylum application in a Member State, provides evidence that he left the territory of the Member States for a period of at least three months before making a new asylum application in another Member State.










2.


Article 27(1) of Regulation No 604/2013, read in the light of recital 19 thereof, must be interpreted to the effect that, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, an asylum applicant may, in an action challenging a transfer decision made in respect of him, invoke an infringement of the rule set out in the second subparagraph of Article 19(2) of that regulation.






(1)  OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.
Case T-292/16: Action brought on 7 June 2016 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT ORIGINAL Super Slims)
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tobacco, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_2016279EN.01003601.xml










1.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/36





Action brought on 7 June 2016 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT ORIGINAL Super Slims)
(Case T-292/16)
(2016/C 279/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd. (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez, I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘GOLD MONT ORIGINAL Super Slims’ — EU trade mark No 11 361 714

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 in Case R 2492/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


accept the present appeal;










—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare the suspension of the Appeal R 2492/2014-4 until a decision on the parallel proceedings R 1857/2015-4 (which is currently appealed before the General Court) becomes definitive;










—


condemn EUIPO (The Boards of Appeal) or subsidiary the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees of the present proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of the principles of equality before the law and impartiality.
Case T-293/16: Action brought on 7 June 2016 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT)
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tobacco, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_2016279EN.01003701.xml










1.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/37





Action brought on 7 June 2016 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT)
(Case T-293/16)
(2016/C 279/52)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd. (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez, I. Valdelomar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘GOLD MONT’ – EU trade mark No 11 803 831

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 in Case R 2699/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


accept the present appeal;










—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare the suspension of the Appeal R 2699/2014-4 until a decision on the parallel proceedings R 1857/2015-4 (which is currently appealed before the General Court) becomes definitive;










—


condemn EUIPO (The Boards of Appeal) or subsidiary the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees of the present proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of the principles of equality before the law and impartiality.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016201EN.01000301.xml










7.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 June 2016
(2016/C 201/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1349 




JPY


Japanese yen


121,58 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4377 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78720 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2460 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1051 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,2935 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,023 




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,45 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3776 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5192 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,3014 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5417 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4665 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8154 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6378 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5424 




KRW


South Korean won


1 323,00 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0065 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4520 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5075 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 162,26 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6472 




PHP


Philippine peso


52,398 




RUB


Russian rouble


74,1968 




THB


Thai baht


40,028 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,9934 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0626 




INR


Indian rupee


75,9995 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships (08112/2016 — C8-0184/2016 — 2016/0061(NLE))
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, European Parliament
Subjects: civil union, divorce, enforcement of ruling, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, judicial separation, jurisdiction, marriage, matrimonial law, mutual recognition principle, private international law








C_2018086EN.01015001.xml










6.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/150





P8_TA(2016)0241
Enhanced cooperation in the area of property regimes of international couples ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships (08112/2016 — C8-0184/2016 — 2016/0061(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 086/24)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (08112/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 329(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0184/2016),










—


having regard to the conditions laid down in Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union and in Articles 326 and 327 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rule 85 and Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0192/2016),












1.


Consents to the draft Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8054 — 3i Group/Deutsche Alternative Asset Management/TCR CapVest) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services








C_2016201EN.01000701.xml










7.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/7





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8054 — 3i Group/Deutsche Alternative Asset Management/TCR CapVest)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 201/07)






1.


On 31 May 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings 3i Group plc (‘3i Group’, United Kingdom), and Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (Global) Limited (‘DAAM’, United Kingdom), an affiliate of Deutsche Bank AG (‘Deutsche Bank’, Germany), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking TCR CapVest SA (‘TCR’, Belgium) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   For 3i Group: international investments, investment management and management advice in private equity, infrastructure and debt management.
—   For DAAM: investment management and fund management services. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, a global provider of financial services.
—   For TCR: specialist provider of aviation ground support equipment providing rental, maintenance/repair/ramp assistance and fleet management services to users of ground support equipment in the aviation sector.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8054 — 3i Group/Deutsche Alternative Asset Management/TCR CapVest, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-222/15: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2016 — Beele Engineering v EUIPO (WE CARE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark WE CARE — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, chemical industry, clothing industry, education, electrical equipment, metal product, miscellaneous industries, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016279EN.01002801.xml










1.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/28





Order of the General Court of 7 June 2016 — Beele Engineering v EUIPO (WE CARE)
(Case T-222/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark WE CARE - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 279/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Beele Engineering BV (Aalten, the Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ring, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2015 (Case R 1933/2014-1), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign WE CARE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Beele Engineering BV shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products to the World Health Organisation's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, with the exception of its provisions falling within the scope of Title V of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (14384/2015 — C8-0118/2016 — 2015/0101(NLE))
Date: 2016-06-07
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Committee on International Trade, Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, European Parliament
Subjects: World Health Organisation, administrative cooperation, extradition, illicit trade, international cooperation, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, legal cooperation, protocol to an agreement, public health, single market








C_2018086EN.01014701.xml










6.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/147





P8_TA(2016)0238
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products to the World Health Organisation's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, with the exception of its provisions falling within the scope of Title V of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (14384/2015 — C8-0118/2016 — 2015/0101(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 086/21)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (14384/2015),










—


having regard to the draft Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products to the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (15044/2013),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 33, 113, 114, 207 and Article 218(6) second subparagraph, point (a), and the second subparagraph of Article 218(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0118/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0154/2016),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the World Health Organisation.