do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-320/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Lille (Regional Court, Lille) (France) lodged on 6 June 2016 — Criminal proceedings against Uber France SAS
Date: 2016-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of EU law, carriage of passengers, exchange of information, freedom to provide services, national law, provision of services, right of establishment, taxi, technical standard, transport company








C_2016296EN.01002201.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/22





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Lille (Regional Court, Lille) (France) lodged on 6 June 2016 — Criminal proceedings against Uber France SAS
(Case C-320/16)
(2016/C 296/29)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Lille

Party to the main proceedings

Uber France SAS

Question referred

Does Article L.3124-13 of the Code des transports, inserted by Law No 2014-1104 of 1 October 2014 on taxis and private hire vehicles, constitute a new technical regulation that is not implicit and that relates to one or more information society services, within the meaning of Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 (1), such that, pursuant to Article 8 of that directive, it had to be notified in advance to the European Commission, or does it fall within the scope of Directive 2006/123/EC (2) of 12 December 2006 on services, Article 2(d) of which excludes transport?
In the event that that question is answered in the affirmative, does a failure to satisfy the notification requirement laid down in Article 8 of the directive mean that Article L.3124-13 of the Code des transports is unenforceable against individuals?


(1)  Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37).

(2)  Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36)
Case T-560/12: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2016 — Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA
Date: 2016-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, powers of the institutions (EU), principle of legal certainty, sanction (EU), size of business, transfer of competence








C_2016270EN.01006701.xml










25.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/67





Order of the General Court of 6 June 2016 — Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA
(Case T-560/12) (1)

(2016/C 270/72)
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
Case F-87/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 6 June 2016 — Matzke v Commission
Date: 2016-06-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, child, damages, dependant, illness, indemnification








C_2016410EN.01004002.xml










7.11.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 410/40





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 6 June 2016 — Matzke v Commission
(Case F-87/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/72)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 262, 10/8/2015, p. 43.
Case C-321/16: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Dublin Circuit & District Civil Courts Office (Ireland) made on 6 June 2016 — Maria Isabel Harmon v Owen Pardue
Date: 2016-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil rights, equal treatment, fundamental rights, injunction, public prosecutor's department, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2016279EN.01002201.xml










1.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/22





Reference for a preliminary ruling from Dublin Circuit & District Civil Courts Office (Ireland) made on 6 June 2016 — Maria Isabel Harmon v Owen Pardue
(Case C-321/16)
(2016/C 279/29)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Dublin Circuit & District Civil Courts Office

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Maria Isabel Harmon

Defendant: Owen Pardue

Questions referred







1.


Having regard to the foregoing has the DPP breached the fundamental rights of Mr. Pardue and in particular those rights as provided for in Articles 6, 20, 41, 47 and 48 and supplemented for in the Preamble of CFR?










2.


Having regard to the foregoing has the DPP the right to refuse to comply with legitimate Court Orders and/or if she fails to comply and/or fails to give an explanation or reason for the non compliance, is this compatible with the CFR?










3.


Having regard to the foregoing and given that the DPP’s decisions are only reviewable by a court if demonstrated that the DPP reached a decision mala fides or influenced by an improper motive or improper policy, as the present state of Irish law permits, is this consistent and compatible with the CFR having regard to the facts of this case?
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/890 of 6 June 2016 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)
Date: 2016-06-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU expenditure, EU police mission, Mali, Sahel, democratisation, paramilitary force, peacekeeping








L_2016149EN.01000601.xml










7.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 149/6








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/890
of 6 June 2016
         
amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 15 April 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/219/CFSP (1) on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali).












(2)


On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/50 (2) providing EUCAP Sahel Mali with a reference amount until 14 January 2017.












(3)


EUCAP Sahel Mali should take enhanced security measures and the number of staff should be adapted.












(4)


Decision 2014/219/CFSP should be amended to adapt the reference amount for EUCAP Sahel Mali,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Article 14 of Decision 2014/219/CFSP, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 April 2014 to 14 January 2015 shall be EUR 5 500 000. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2015 to 14 January 2016 shall be EUR 11 400 000. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2016 to 14 January 2017 shall be EUR 19 775 000. The financial reference amount for the subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 6 June 2016.


For the Council


The President

H.G.J. KAMP
            





(1)  Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali), (OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21).

(2)  Decision (CFSP) 2016/50 of 18 January 2016 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 48).