do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-723/14: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — HX v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Modification of the form of order sought — Error of assessment)
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, trade restriction








C_2016251EN.01002501.xml










11.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/25





Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — HX v Council
(Case T-723/14) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Modification of the form of order sought - Error of assessment))
(2016/C 251/27)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: HX (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: S. Koev, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: I. Gurov and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2014 L 217, p. 49), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2014 L 217, p. 10), and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 132, p. 82), in so far as the applicant’s name was included on the lists of persons and entities covered by those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls, in so far as they concern HX, Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by HX.






(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.
Case F-28/16: Action brought on 2 June 2016 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, Palestine, Union delegation, reassignment, status of Jerusalem








C_2016296EN.01004502.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/45





Action brought on 2 June 2016 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-28/16)
(2016/C 296/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to adopt, within a reasonable period, the measures for compliance with the judgment in Case F-96/13 and annulment of the decision of 22 December 2015, which, by reassigning the applicant, with retroactive effect, from the delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in East Jerusalem to DG Mobility and Transport, Directorate of Shared Resources MOVE/ENER in Brussels, constitutes a decision confirming refusal to comply with the judgment referred to.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the Commission’s decision not to adopt the measures to comply with the judgment in Case F-96/13 and the decision of 22 December 2015 to reassign the applicant, in the interest of the service, from the EU delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (East Jerusalem) to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (MOVE) in Brussels with retroactive effect from 1 January 2013, a merely confirmatory decision which has already been implemented for over almost 3 years;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, air transport, inland transport, public service, transport regulations








C_2016195EN.01000601.xml










2.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 195/6





Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(2016/C 195/04)






Member State


Norway




Route concerned


Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.
Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.
Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.
Leknes – Bodø v.v., Svolvær – Bodø v.v.
Røst – Bodø v.v.
Narvik (Framnes) – Bodø v.v.
Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.
Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.
Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.
Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.
Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 April 2012
(announced on 25 August 2011 in OJ C 247 and the EEA Supplement No 47/2011)




Date of repeal


1 April 2017




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained







Ministry of Transport and Communications




PO Box 8010 Dep




N-0030 OSLO




NORWAY




Tel. +47 22248353




Email: postmottak@sd.dep.no
Judgment of the Court of 2 June 2016 in Case E-24/15 — Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung (Coordination of social security systems — Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Binding effect of medical findings)
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Liechtenstein, administrative procedure, debt, medical report, social security legislation, social-security harmonisation








C_2017066EN.01003101.xml










2.3.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/31





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 2 June 2016
in Case E-24/15
Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung
(Coordination of social security systems — Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Binding effect of medical findings)
(2017/C 66/10)
In Case E-24/15, Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung — request to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Princely Court of Appeal (Fürstliches Obergericht) concerning the interpretation of Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 2 June 2016, the operative part of which is as follows:






1.


Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 precludes the debtor institution from challenging the medical findings of the institution of the place of stay or residence in the administrative procedure.










2.


The binding effect mentioned in Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 applies in court proceedings following on from an administrative proceeding before the debtor institution in a situation such as that of the present case.
Case T-288/16: Action brought on 2 June 2016 – Convivo v EUIPO – Porcesadora Nacional de Alimentos (M'Cooky)
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016260EN.01005101.xml










18.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/51





Action brought on 2 June 2016 – Convivo v EUIPO – Porcesadora Nacional de Alimentos (M'Cooky)
(Case T-288/16)
(2016/C 260/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Convivo GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: C. Düchs, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Porcesadora Nacional de Alimentos C.A. Pronaca (Quito, Ecuador)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘M’Cooky’ – International registration designating the European Union No 1 075 242

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2016 in Case R 1039/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the Applicant for the present judicial proceedings including those incurred in the appeal and opposition proceedings;










—


order the EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-205/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 June 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Air transport — Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 — Allocation of slots at European Union airports — Article 4(2) — Independence of the coordinator — Concept of ‘interested party’ — Airport managing body — Functional separation — System of financing)
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air traffic, air traffic control, airport, infringement of EU law, transport planning








C_2016287EN.01000201.xml










8.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/2





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 June 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
(Case C-205/14) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Air transport - Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 - Allocation of slots at European Union airports - Article 4(2) - Independence of the coordinator - Concept of ‘interested party’ - Airport managing body - Functional separation - System of financing))
(2016/C 287/02)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and F. Wilman, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes and V. Moura Ramos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to ensure that the coordinator for the allocation of slots is independent by separating the coordinator functionally from any single interested party and by failing to ensure that the system of financing the coordinator’s activities is such as to guarantee the coordinator’s independent status, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 545/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009;










2.


Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.
Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, public service, transport regulations








C_2016195EN.01000801.xml










2.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 195/8





Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(2016/C 195/06)






Member State


Norway




Concerned routes


Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta
Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.
Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.
Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.
Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.
Leknes – Bodø v.v., Svolvær – Bodø v.v.
Røst – Bodø v.v.
Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.
Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.
Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.
Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.
Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.




Period of validity of the contract


1 April 2017 – 31 March 2022




Deadline for submission of tenders


8 August 2016




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained







Ministry of Transport and Communications




PO Box 8010 Dep




N-0030 OSLO




NORWAY




Tel. +47 22248353




postmottak@sd.dep.no




https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/id2000006/?documenttype=dokumenter/anbud
Case C-418/14: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu -Poland) — ROZ-ŚWIT Zakład Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowy Henryk Ciurko, Adam Pawłowski spółka jawna v Dyrektor Izby Celnej we Wrocławiu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Excise duties — Directive 2003/96/EC — Differentiated rates of excise duty for motor fuels and heating fuels — Condition for the application of the rate for heating fuels — Submission of a monthly list of statements that the products purchased are for heating purposes — Application of the rate of excise duty laid down for motor fuels where that list is not submitted — Principle of proportionality)
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: fuel, heating, principle of proportionality, tax on consumption








C_2016287EN.01000701.xml










8.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/7





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu -Poland) — ROZ-ŚWIT Zakład Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowy Henryk Ciurko, Adam Pawłowski spółka jawna v Dyrektor Izby Celnej we Wrocławiu
(Case C-418/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Excise duties - Directive 2003/96/EC - Differentiated rates of excise duty for motor fuels and heating fuels - Condition for the application of the rate for heating fuels - Submission of a monthly list of statements that the products purchased are for heating purposes - Application of the rate of excise duty laid down for motor fuels where that list is not submitted - Principle of proportionality))
(2016/C 287/08)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ROZ-ŚWIT Zakład Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowy Henryk Ciurko, Adam Pawłowski spółka jawna

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Celnej we Wrocławiu

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, as amended by Council Directive 2004/75/EC of 29 April 2004, and the principle of proportionality must be interpreted as:






—


not precluding national legislation under which sellers of heating fuel are required to submit, within a prescribed time limit, a monthly list of statements from purchasers that the products purchased are for heating purposes, and










—


precluding national legislation under which, if a list of statements from purchasers is not submitted within a prescribed time limit, the excise duty applicable for motor fuels is applied to the heating fuel sold, even though it has been found that the intended use of that product for heating purposes is not in doubt.






(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.
Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, air transport, inland transport, public service, transport regulations








C_2016195EN.01000701.xml










2.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 195/7





Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(2016/C 195/05)






Member State


Norway




Concerned routes


Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta
Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.
Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.
Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.
Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.
Leknes – Bodø v.v., Svolvær – Bodø v.v.
Røst – Bodø v.v.
Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.
Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.
Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.
Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.
Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 April 2017




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained







Ministry of Transport and Communications




PO Box 8010 Dep




N-0030 Oslo




NORWAY




Tel. +47 22248353




postmottak@sd.dep.no




https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/id2000006/?documenttype=dokumenter/anbud
Case C-233/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 June 2016 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 18 TFEU, 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU — Citizenship of the Union — Right to move and reside freely — Discrimination on grounds of nationality — Financial support for travel costs awarded to national students — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 24(2) — Derogation from the principle of equal treatment — Maintenance aid for studies consisting in student grants or student loans — Scope — Formal requirements of the application initiating proceedings — Coherent statement of the pleas in law)
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European citizenship, discrimination on the basis of nationality, education grant, equal treatment, foreign student, free movement of persons, means of public conveyance, residence permit, transportation tariff








C_2016287EN.01000301.xml










8.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/3





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 June 2016 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands
(Case C-233/14) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 18 TFEU, 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU - Citizenship of the Union - Right to move and reside freely - Discrimination on grounds of nationality - Financial support for travel costs awarded to national students - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 24(2) - Derogation from the principle of equal treatment - Maintenance aid for studies consisting in student grants or student loans - Scope - Formal requirements of the application initiating proceedings - Coherent statement of the pleas in law))
(2016/C 287/04)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. van Beek and C. Gheorghiu, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and C. Schillemans, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2016-06-02
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, air transport, inland transport, public service, transport regulations








C_2016195EN.01000501.xml










2.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 195/5





Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(2016/C 195/03)






Member State


Norway




Route concerned


Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta
Hasvik — Tromsø v.v., Hasvik — Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen — Tromsø v.v.




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations


15 April 2013
(announced on 11 October 2012 in OJ C 307 and the EEA Supplement No 57/2012)




Date of repeal


1 April 2017




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained







Ministry of Transport and Communications




PO Box 8010 Dep




N-0030 OSLO




NORWAY




Tel. +47 22248353




Email: postmottak@sd.dep.no