do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-5/15: Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Ice Mountain Ibiza v EUIPO — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean beach club ibiza) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ocean beach club ibiza — Earlier national figurative marks OC ocean club and OC ocean club Ibiza — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leisure, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016243EN.01003001.xml










4.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 243/30





Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Ice Mountain Ibiza v EUIPO — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean beach club ibiza)
(Case T-5/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ocean beach club ibiza - Earlier national figurative marks OC ocean club and OC ocean club Ibiza - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2016/C 243/31)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL (San Antonio, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Gracia Albero, F. Miazzetto and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club, SL (Puerto Banús, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2014 (Case R 2292/2013-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club and Ice Mountain Ibiza

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
Case F-27/16: Action brought on 25 May 2016 — ZZ v EASA
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, reassignment








C_2016296EN.01004501.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/45





Action brought on 25 May 2016 — ZZ v EASA
(Case F-27/16)
(2016/C 296/56)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz. lawyers)

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision transferring the applicant to a new position in the interests of the service.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the contested decision and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.
Special Report No 8/2016 — ‘Rail freight transport in the EU: still not on the right track’
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, EU policy, carriage of goods, competitiveness, intra-EU transport, rail transport








C_2016186EN.01000301.xml










25.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/3





Special Report No 8/2016
‘Rail freight transport in the EU: still not on the right track’
(2016/C 186/03)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 8/2016 ‘Rail freight transport in the EU: still not on the right track’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu
Case T-581/15: Order of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Syndial v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to an infringement procedure against Italy — Possible non-compliance with Directives 2011/92/EU and 1999/13/EC — Reclamation of a former industrial site (Cengio-Saliceto) — Refusal of access — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Liguria, access to EU information, infringement procedure (EU), polluted area, provision of documents








C_2016260EN.01004101.xml










18.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/41





Order of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Syndial v Commission
(Case T-581/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to an infringement procedure against Italy - Possible non-compliance with Directives 2011/92/EU and 1999/13/EC - Reclamation of a former industrial site (Cengio-Saliceto) - Refusal of access - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2016/C 260/51)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Syndial SpA — Attività Diversificate (San Donato Milanese, Italy) (represented by: L. Acquarone and S. Grassi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 3 August 2015 refusing to grant the applicant access to the documents concerning the procedure relating to a possible failure on the part of the Italian Republic to comply with its obligations under Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 2012 L 26, p. 1) and under Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ 1999 L 182, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Syndial SpA — Attività Diversificate shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.
Case C-294/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi — Śródmieścia w Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 25 May 2016 — Criminal proceedings against J.Z.
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU police cooperation, European arrest warrant, detention before trial, extradition, mutual recognition principle








C_2016296EN.01002101.xml










16.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/21





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi — Śródmieścia w Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 25 May 2016 — Criminal proceedings against J.Z.
(Case C-294/16)
(2016/C 296/27)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi — Śródmieścia

Party/parties to the main proceedings

J.Z.

Question referred

Must Article 26(1) of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1) (2002/584/JHA), in conjunction with Article 6(1) and (3) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘detention’ also covers measures applied by the executing State, in connection with a curfew, consisting in the electronic monitoring of the place of residence of the person to whom the arrest warrant applies?


(1)  OJ 2002, L 190, p. 1.
Case C-297/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2016 — Colegiul Medicilor Veterinari din România v Autoritatea Națională Sanitară Veterinară și pentru Siguranța Alimentelor
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: exclusive distribution agreement, organic product, retail trade, right of establishment, veterinarian, veterinary drug, veterinary medicine








C_2016314EN.01001001.xml










29.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/10





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2016 — Colegiul Medicilor Veterinari din România v Autoritatea Națională Sanitară Veterinară și pentru Siguranța Alimentelor
(Case C-297/16)
(2016/C 314/15)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Colegiul Medicilor Veterinari din România

Respondent: Autoritatea Națională Sanitară Veterinară și pentru Siguranța Alimentelor

Intervener: Asociaţia Naţională a Distribuitorilor de Produse de Uz Veterinar din România

Questions referred







1.


Does EU law preclude national legislation which provides that veterinary surgeons are to have an exclusive right in relation to the retailing and use of organic products, special purpose anti-parasitic products and veterinary medicinal products?










2.


If such an exclusive right is compatible with EU law, does the latter preclude such a right from additionally concerning the structures through which the sale of such products takes place, in the sense that such structures must be mainly or exclusively owned by one or more veterinary surgeons?
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20’ (COM(2016) 202 final — 2016/0110 (COD))
Date: 2016-05-25
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, audit, financial services, international standard, single market, standardised accounting system








C_2016303EN.01014701.xml










19.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 303/147





Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20’
(COM(2016) 202 final — 2016/0110 (COD))
(2016/C 303/21)
On 28 and 29 April 2016 respectively, the European Parliament and the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the:

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20

(COM(2016) 202 final — 2016/0110 (COD)).
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in opinion CES 1031/2013 — 2012/0364 (COD), adopted on 20 March 2013 (1), it decided at its 517th plenary session, held on 25 and 26 May 2016 (meeting of 25 May), by 154 votes to 1 with 7 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject but to refer to the position it took in the above-mentioned document.

Brussels, 25 May 2016.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Georges DASSIS




(1)  OJ C 161, 6.6.2013, p. 64.