do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7994 — The Kingdom of Denmark/DONG) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-05-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, energy distribution, gas industry, merger control, mining industry, wind energy








C_2016164EN.01000101.xml










5.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7994 — The Kingdom of Denmark/DONG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 164/01)
On 27 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.










—


In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7994. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-05-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016164EN.01000501.xml










5.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

4 May 2016
(2016/C 164/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1505 




JPY


Japanese yen


122,62 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4404 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79284 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2630 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0993 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3410 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,031 




HUF


Hungarian forint


312,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3936 




RON


Romanian leu


4,4920 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2893 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5379 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4670 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9295 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6669 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5605 




KRW


South Korean won


1 338,14 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0072 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4789 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5110 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 320,06 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6120 




PHP


Philippine peso


54,352 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,9560 




THB


Thai baht


40,377 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,1091 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,4573 




INR


Indian rupee


76,6110 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-210/16: Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Lukash v Council
Date: 2016-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, ownership, rights of the defence








C_2016243EN.01003901.xml










4.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 243/39





Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Lukash v Council
(Case T-210/16)
(2016/C 243/43)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Olena Lukash (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Cessieux, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare Ms Olena Lukash’s action to be admissible;










—


annul, in so far as it concerns the applicant, Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine;










—


annul, in so far as it concerns the applicant, Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine;










—


annul the subsequent decisions and regulations extending the restrictive measures laid down by Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and updating the grounds, namely:






—


Council Decision 2015/364/CFSP of 5 March 2015;










—


Council Regulation (EU) 2015/357 of 5 March 2015;










—


Council Decision 2015/876/CFSP of 5 June 2015;










—


Council Regulation (EU) 2015/869 of 5 June 2015;










—


Council Decision 2016/318/CFSP of 4 March 2016;










—


Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 4 March 2016;














—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs in accordance with Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging an infringement of the rights of defence and of the right to an effective remedy.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the obligation to state reasons.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a failure to observe the criteria set out in Article 1 of Decision 2014/119/CFSP, reiterated in recital 4 of Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, in recital 3 of Decision 2015/364/CFSP, reiterated in recital 2 of Regulation (EU) 2015/357, in recital 4 of Decision 2015/876/CFSP, reiterated in recital 3 of Regulation (EU) 2015/357, and in recital 4 of Decision 2016/318/CFSP, reiterated in recital 2 of Regulation (EU) 2015/357.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of fact by the Council.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging a clear breach of the applicant’s right to property.
Case T-223/16: Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)
Date: 2016-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2016251EN.01003901.xml










11.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/39





Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)
(Case T-223/16)
(2016/C 251/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Massive Bionics, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Galindo Martens, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple, Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States of America)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘DriCloud’ — Application for registration No 11 723 509

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 03/03/2016 in Case R 339/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendants to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8010 — Irish Life/Aviva Health/GloHealth) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-05-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, merger control








C_2016164EN.01000601.xml










5.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/6





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8010 — Irish Life/Aviva Health/GloHealth)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 164/05)






1.


On 28 April 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Irish Life Group Limited (‘Irish Life’, Ireland), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Great-West Lifeco Inc. (‘Great-West Lifeco’, Canada), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of the undertakings GloHealth Financial Services Limited (‘GloHealth’, Ireland) and Aviva Health Insurance Ireland Limited (‘Aviva Health’, Ireland) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   Great-West Lifeco: international financial services holding company with interests in life insurance, health insurance, retirement and investment services, asset management, and reinsurance businesses in Canada, the United States, Europe and Asia,
—   Irish Life: provision of life insurance, pensions, retirement savings and asset management services in Ireland,
—   GloHealth: provision of health insurance products to both consumer and business customers in Ireland,
—   Aviva Health: provision of health insurance products to both consumer and business customers in Ireland.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.8010 — Irish Life/Aviva Health/GloHealth, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply
Date: 2016-05-05
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2016164EN.01000401.xml










5.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/4





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply
(2016/C 164/03)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DGC 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/44.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.