do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7573 — DMK/DOC Kaas) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: dairy industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2016134EN.01000201.xml










15.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7573 — DMK/DOC Kaas)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 134/02)
On 3 March 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7573. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-150/15: Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Der Bundesbeauftragte für Asylangelegenheiten beim Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge v N, in the presence of: Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: area of freedom, security and justice, freedom of religious beliefs, religion, religious discrimination, repression








C_2016279EN.01002401.xml










1.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/24





Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Der Bundesbeauftragte für Asylangelegenheiten beim Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge v N, in the presence of: Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-150/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/32)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Grand Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.
Case C-211/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 15 April 2016 — Bimotor SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale II di Torino
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, tax rebate, tax relief








C_2016251EN.01000702.xml










11.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/7





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 15 April 2016 — Bimotor SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale II di Torino
(Case C-211/16)
(2016/C 251/10)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Bimotor SpA

Respondent: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale II di Torino

Question referred

Does the Community legislation on VAT (Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977, as amended by Directive 2002/38/EC (2) and Directive 2006/112/EC (3)) preclude legislation of a Member State — such as Article 34(1) of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000 — under which VAT claims may be repaid or used to offset tax owed, for a given tax year, not in their entirety but only up to a predetermined maximum limit?


(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

(2)  Council Directive 2002/38/EC of 7 May 2002 amending and amending temporarily Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the value added tax arrangements applicable to radio and television broadcasting services and certain electronically supplied services (OJ 2002 L 128, p. 41).

(3)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Corrigendum to the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (OJ C 76, 4.3.2015)
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, animal product, arms industry, beverage industry, common customs tariff, crop production, electrical equipment, fats, leather industry, live animal, metallurgical industry, mineral compound, optical industry, plastics industry, precious stones, processing industry, textile industry, tobacco, vehicle, wood industry








C_2016134EN.01000401.xml










15.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/4





Corrigendum to the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 76 of 4 March 2015
)
(2016/C 134/04)
On page 186, CN Code 3912 20 11‘Collodions and celloidin’:

for:


‘Collodion is by weight a 12 % nitrocellulose solution in a mixture of ether and alcohol.’,


read:


‘Collodion is a solution of nitrocellulose containing 12 % by weight of nitrogen in a mixture of ether and alcohol.’.
Case T-159/16: Action brought on 15 April 2016 — Metronia v EUIPO — Zitro IP (TRIPLE O NADA)
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, game of chance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016211EN.01006101.xml










13.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/61






Action brought on 15 April 2016 — Metronia v EUIPO — Zitro IP (TRIPLE O NADA)
(Case T-159/16)
(2016/C 211/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Metronia, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘TRIPLE O NADA’ — Application for registration No 11 603 529

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2016 in Case R 2605/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


uphold the action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of 15 February 2016 and allow the EU trade mark applied for;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-163/16: Action brought on 15 April 2016 — Reisswolf v EUIPO (secret. service.)
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, data protection, documentation, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2016200EN.01003001.xml










6.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/30





Action brought on 15 April 2016 — Reisswolf v EUIPO (secret. service.)
(Case T-163/16)
(2016/C 200/43)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘secret. service.’ — Application No 14 108 757

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2016 in Case R 1820/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016134EN.01000301.xml










15.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

14 April 2016
(2016/C 134/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1252 




JPY


Japanese yen


123,09 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4415 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79560 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1580 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0878 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,2640 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,028 




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2992 




RON


Romanian leu


4,4728 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2203 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4610 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4434 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7283 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6395 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5346 




KRW


South Korean won


1 298,53 




ZAR


South African rand


16,3938 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2970 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4822 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 844,32 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3737 




PHP


Philippine peso


51,982 




RUB


Russian rouble


74,2429 




THB


Thai baht


39,506 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,9586 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,6655 




INR


Indian rupee


74,8648 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/655 of 15 April 2016 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Saucisson de l'Ardèche (PGI))
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Rhône-Alpes, designation of origin, labelling, meat product, product designation








L_2016114EN.01000401.xml










28.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 114/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/655
of 15 April 2016
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Saucisson de l'Ardèche (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Saucisson de l'Ardèche’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 719/2011 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should therefore be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Saucisson de l'Ardèche’ (PGI) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 15 April 2016.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 719/2011 of 20 July 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Saucisson de l'Ardèche (PGI)) (OJ L 193, 23.7.2011, p. 17).

(3)  
            OJ C 437, 29.12.2015, p. 9.
Case T-320/15: Order of the General Court of 15 April 2016 — Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro v Commission (Public procurement — Withdrawal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2016-04-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: building, goodwill, principle of proportionality, right to justice, tendering








C_2016200EN.01002102.xml










6.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/21





Order of the General Court of 15 April 2016 — Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro v Commission
(Case T-320/15) (1)

((Public procurement - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 200/30)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro SpA (Vicenza, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, C. Santacroce and C. Toniolo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 7 April 2015 of the Director General of the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC.B6/RL/Ares(2015)) excluding the applicant from participation in all procedures for the award of contracts and grants financed by the general budget of the European Union for a period of two years and 10 months.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:






1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.