do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-166/16: Action brought on 13 April 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, claim, debt, interest, mother tongue, payment, principle of proportionality








C_2016200EN.01003201.xml










6.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/32





Action brought on 13 April 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament
(Case T-166/16)
(2016/C 200/45)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Pier Antonio Panzeri (Calusco d’Adda, Italy) (represented by: C. Cerami, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


uphold the present action and, accordingly, annul the contested measures as unlawful;










—


consequently, order the European Parliament to repay EUR 12 000, together with interest and adjustment for inflation, or the higher sum which will be paid in compliance with the contested order in the course of the present proceedings;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action is brought against Memorandum No D 302 681 of 11 February 2016 of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament, which contains the statement of reasons for Debit Note No 2016-207 of the same date appended thereto and concerning the recovery of sums alleged to have been unduly paid by way of parliamentary assistance allowances.
The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-677/15, Panzeri v Parliament and Commission (OJ 2016 C 27, p. 74).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016130EN.01000601.xml










13.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/6





Euro exchange rates (1)

12 April 2016
(2016/C 130/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1396 




JPY


Japanese yen


123,44 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4434 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79840 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2138 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0874 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3515 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,030 




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,38 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2923 




RON


Romanian leu


4,4708 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2274 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4882 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4674 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8371 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6540 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5354 




KRW


South Korean won


1 302,88 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7396 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3632 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4890 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 917,84 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4273 




PHP


Philippine peso


52,517 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,6167 




THB


Thai baht


39,943 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,0034 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,0248 




INR


Indian rupee


75,6680 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Ladislav Balko as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0413/2015 — 2015/0816(NLE))
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2018058EN.01024801.xml










15.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/248





P8_TA(2016)0117
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Ladislav Balko
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Ladislav Balko as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0413/2015 — 2015/0816(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 058/37)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0413/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0055/2016),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Ladislav Balko as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
List of national authorities designated according to Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, administrative cooperation, customs regulations, data protection, directory, interinstitutional cooperation (EU), mutual assistance, personal data, public authorities








C_2016130EN.01000701.xml










13.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/7





List of national authorities designated according to Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters
(2016/C 130/05)






Member State


Organisation Name




AT


Risiko-, Informations- und Analysezentrum




BE


Douane




BG


Агенция ‘Митници’




CY


Τελωνειο Λαρνακας
Τελωνειο Λεμεσου
Τελωνειο Λευκωσιας
Τελωνειο Παφου
Τομεας Διερευνησεων Αρχιτελωνειο
Τμημα Τελωνειων
Τομεας Πληροφοριων και Αναλυσης Κινδυνου Αρχιτελωνειο




CZ


General Directorate of Customs




DE


Zollkriminalamt




DK


SKAT




EE


Teabeosakond — Maksu- ja Tolliamet




ES


Departamento de Aduanas e II.EE.




FI


Tulli, Valvontaosasto




FR


Direction nationale du renseignement et des enquêtes douanières




GR


Διεύθυνση Στρατηγικής Τελωνειακών Ελέγχων και Παραβάσεων




HR


Sustav upravljanja rizicima




HU


Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Központi Irányítás Rendészeti Főosztály




IE


Customs Division, Risk Management Unit, Intelligence Support Unit, Mutual Assistance Unit, Central Intelligence & Drugs Law Enforcement, National Drugs Team




LT


Muitinės kriminalinė tarnyba
Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė
Kauno teritorinė muitinė
Klaipėdos teritorinė muitinė




LU


Service analyse de risques




LV


Latvijas Republikas Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, Muitas pārvalde,
Latvijas Republikas Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, Muitas policijas pārvalde




MT


Dipartiment tad-Dwana — Malta




NL


Douane Informatie Centrum




PL


Izba Celna w Katowicach




PT


Direcção de Servicos Antifraude Aduaneira




RO


Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală a Vămilor




SE


Tullverket




SI


Finančna uprava Republike Slovenije




SK


Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy Slovenskej republiky




UK


BF Intelligence & Analytics Team
RIS A&I
HM Revenue & Customs
UK HMRC NCU
UK Border Force
BFNIH
RIS OPS
Felixstowe
Dover
Project Tiger
Intelligence Bureau London
Southampton




European Commission


DG OLAF
Case T-81/15: Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2016 — Facchinello v EUIPO — Olimpia Splendid (Synthesis) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark Synthesis — Absence of genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court)
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electrical engineering, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016191EN.01002702.xml










30.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/27





Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2016 — Facchinello v EUIPO — Olimpia Splendid (Synthesis)
(Case T-81/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Synthesis - Absence of genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court))
(2016/C 191/35)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Danila Facchinello (Molinella, Italy) (represented by: F. Torlontano, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Olimpia Splendid Spa (Gualtieri, Italy) (represented by: A. Ferrarese and G. Ferrarese, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2014 (Case R 2169/2013-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Olimpia Splendid SpA and Ms Danila Facchinello.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Danila Facchinello to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2016130EN.01000501.xml










13.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/5





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
(2016/C 130/03)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C — Horizontal Issues Unit




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Janusz Wojciechowski as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0414/2015 — 2015/0817(NLE))
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2018058EN.01024901.xml










15.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/249





P8_TA(2016)0118
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Janusz Wojciechowski
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Janusz Wojciechowski as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0414/2015 — 2015/0817(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 058/38)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0414/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0061/2016),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a negative opinion on the Council’s nomination of Janusz Wojciechowski as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0412/2015 — 2015/0815(NLE))
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2018058EN.01024701.xml










15.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/247





P8_TA(2016)0116
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Jan Gregor
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0412/2015 — 2015/0815(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 058/36)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0412/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0057/2016),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Case C-206/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 13 April 2016 — Marco Tronchetti Provera SpA and Others v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, offer price, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, takeover bid, transparency in decision-making








C_2016251EN.01000601.xml










11.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/6





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 13 April 2016 — Marco Tronchetti Provera SpA and Others v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)
(Case C-206/16)
(2016/C 251/08)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Marco Tronchetti Provera SpA, Antares European Fund Limited, Antares European Fund II Limited, Antares European Fund LP, Luca Orsini Baroni, UniCredit SpA, Lauro Sessantuno SpA

Defendant: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

Question referred

Is the proper application of the second paragraph of Article 5(4) of Directive 2004/25/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids, in the light of the general principles laid down in Article 3(1) thereof, and the proper application of the general principles of European law relating to legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, proportionality, reasonableness, transparency and non-discrimination, prevented by a provision of national law such as Article 106(3)(d)(2) of Legislative Decree No 58 of 24 February 1998 (consolidating all provisions in the field of financial intermediation within the meaning of Articles 8 and 21 of Law No 52 of 6 February 1996), as subsequently amended, and Article 47 octies of Decision of the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa — Consob No 11971 of 14 May 1999 (Order implementing Legislative Decree No 58 of 24 February 1998 laying down rules applicable to offerees), as subsequently amended, in so far as those provisions authorise Consob to increase the takeover bid as referred to in Article 106 where the condition that ‘there has been collusion between the offeror or the persons acting in concert with it and one or more sellers’ is fulfilled, without identifying the specific actions which constitute such a situation, and thus without determining clearly the conditions and criteria under which Consob is authorised to adjust upwards the price of the takeover bid?


(1)  Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 april 2004 on takeover bids (OJ 2004 L 142, p. 12).
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Samo Jereb as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0025/2016 — 2016/0804(NLE))
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2018058EN.01024501.xml










15.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/245





P8_TA(2016)0114
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Samo Jereb
European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Samo Jereb as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0025/2016 — 2016/0804(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 058/34)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0025/2016),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0060/2016),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Samo Jereb as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7941 — Saint-Gobain Glass France/Corning/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, glass, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2016130EN.01001001.xml










13.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/10





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7941 — Saint-Gobain Glass France/Corning/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 130/07)






1.


On 6 April 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Compagnie de Saint-Gobain SA (France) and Corning Incorporated (United States of America) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Saint-Gobain: innovative materials (including flat glass), construction products, and building materials distribution,
—   for Corning: speciality glass, ceramics, and optical physics for use in a wide range of industries. Corning’s main areas of activity are flat glass for display and cover applications for use in consumer electronics; optical fibre, cable, hardware and related equipment for communication networks; vessels for drug research and discover applications in the life sciences industry; pharmaceutical tubing; ceramic filters and substrates to reduce emissions from combustible engines; and advanced glass technologies for new applications,
—   for the JV: the development, manufacture and commercialisation of innovative laminated lightweight glazing solutions for the automotive industry which will include at least one layer of thin glass having an aluminosilicate composition.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7941 — Saint-Gobain Glass France/Corning/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).