do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-266/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — Central Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Criterion relating to the provision of material, logistical or financial support to the Government of Iran — Financial services of a central bank)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Iran, central bank, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, financial services, international sanctions, trade restriction








C_2016211EN.01002002.xml










13.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/20






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — Central Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union
(Case C-266/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Restrictive measures taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Criterion relating to the provision of material, logistical or financial support to the Government of Iran - Financial services of a central bank))
(2016/C 211/25)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Central Bank of Iran (represented by: M. Lester and Z. Al-Rikabi, Barristers)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Central Bank of Iran to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.
Extract of a winding-up measure decided under Article 9 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Latvia, claim, credit institution, liquidation








C_2016123EN.01000201.xml










7.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/2





Extract of a winding-up measure decided under Article 9 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
(2016/C 123/02)
Riga City Vidzeme District Court on 14 March 2016 has ruled to liquidate JSC TRASTA KOMERCBANKA (registration #40003029667) and appointed liquidator Ilmārs Krūms.






Credit Institution


JSC TRASTA KOMERCBANKA
registration #40003029667




Date


14 March 2016




Entry into force


14 March 2016




Nature of Decision


Opening of winding-up (liquidation) proceedings
Appointment of the liquidator




Competent authority


Riga City Vidzeme District Court




Supervisory authority







Financial and Capital Market Commission




1 Kungu St.




Rīga, LV-1050




LATVIJA




Tel. +371 7774800








Appointed liquidator







Mr Ilmārs Krūms




Miesnieku street 9




Rīga, LV-1050




LATVIJA




Tel. +371 67027777




Email: ilmars.krums@smpa.lv








Creditor claims and other claims should be submitted to the liquidator within 3 months from the publication date.
Case C-294/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — ADM Hamburg AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Community Customs Code — Tariff Preferences — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 74(1) — Products originating from a beneficiary country — Transport — Consignments composed of a mixture of crude palm kernel oil originating in several countries benefiting from the same preferential treatment)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: common customs tariff, customs regulations, customs union, generalised preferences, import (EU), least-developed country, originating product, tariff preference, vegetable oil








C_2016211EN.01000701.xml










13.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/7






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — ADM Hamburg AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
(Case C-294/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Community Customs Code - Tariff Preferences - Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Article 74(1) - Products originating from a beneficiary country - Transport - Consignments composed of a mixture of crude palm kernel oil originating in several countries benefiting from the same preferential treatment))
(2016/C 211/07)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ADM Hamburg AG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 74(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1063/2010 of 18 November 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, where valid certificates of origin have been presented, the preferential origin, within the meaning of the generalised system of preferences established by Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007, of consignments of crude palm kernel oil may be recognised even where those products have been mixed in the tank of a vessel at the time of their transport to the European Union in circumstances where it is possible to rule out that other products, in particular products not benefiting from any preferential treatment, have been added to that tank.


(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.
Case T-613/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — Industrias Tomás Morcillo v EUIPO — Aucar Trailer (Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits — Earlier European Union figurative mark POLICAR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, plastics industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016191EN.01002501.xml










30.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/25





Judgment of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — Industrias Tomás Morcillo v EUIPO — Aucar Trailer (Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits)
(Case T-613/14) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union figurative mark Polycart A Whole Cart Full of Benefits - Earlier European Union figurative mark POLICAR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 191/31)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Industrias Tomás Morcillo, SL (Albuixech, Spain) (represented by: A. Sanz-Bermell y Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO: Aucar Trailer, SL (Premia de Mar, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the EUIPO of 7 May 2014 (Case R 1735/2012-1), elating to opposition proceedings between Aucar Trailer, SL and Industrias Tomás Morcillo, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Industrias Tomás Morcillo, SL to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.
Case C-556/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — Holcim (Romania) SA v European Commission (Appeal — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading in the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Articles 19 and 20 — Regulation (EC) No 2216/2004 — Article 10 — System of registries for transactions concerning emission allowances — Liability for fault — Commission’s refusal to disclose information on and to prohibit all transactions involving stolen emission allowances — Strict liability)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, access to EU information, greenhouse gas, theft, tradeable emission permit








C_2016211EN.01001601.xml










13.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/16






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — Holcim (Romania) SA v European Commission
(Case C-556/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Environment - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading in the European Union - Directive 2003/87/EC - Articles 19 and 20 - Regulation (EC) No 2216/2004 - Article 10 - System of registries for transactions concerning emission allowances - Liability for fault - Commission’s refusal to disclose information on and to prohibit all transactions involving stolen emission allowances - Strict liability))
(2016/C 211/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Holcim (Romania) SA (represented by: L. Arnauts, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. White and K. Mifsud Bonnici, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Holcim (Romania) SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016123EN.01000101.xml










7.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 April 2016
(2016/C 123/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1336 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,13 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4412 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,80808 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2628 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0887 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4760 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,029 




HUF


Hungarian forint


312,33 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2636 




RON


Romanian leu


4,4685 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2343 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5029 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4912 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7927 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6705 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5373 




KRW


South Korean won


1 318,35 




ZAR


South African rand


17,2805 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3550 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5100 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 025,07 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4660 




PHP


Philippine peso


52,456 




RUB


Russian rouble


77,8058 




THB


Thai baht


40,010 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2000 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,1485 




INR


Indian rupee


75,5780 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-644/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — ADR Center v Commission (Application for interim measures — Arbitration clause — Agreements concluded for the purpose of carrying out projects subsidised by the European Union within the framework of the ‘Civil Justice’ programme — Enforceable decision of the Commission to recover the sums paid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, audit, invoicing, proof, redemption








C_2016191EN.01003001.xml










30.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/30





Order of the President of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — ADR Center v Commission
(Case T-644/14 R)
((Application for interim measures - Arbitration clause - Agreements concluded for the purpose of carrying out projects subsidised by the European Union within the framework of the ‘Civil Justice’ programme - Enforceable decision of the Commission to recover the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))
(2016/C 191/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the enforcement of Commission Decision C(2014) 4485 final of 27 June 2014 concerning the recovery of the sum of EUR 194 275,34, plus interest, owed by ADR Center Srl with reference to debit notes Nos 3241311168, 3241311170 and 3241311175 relating to EUR 62 649,47, EUR 78 991,12 and EUR 52 634,75 respectively.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 22 January 2016 is cancelled in so far as it relates to Case T-644/14 R.










3.


The costs are reserved.
Case C-193/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 7 April 2016 — E v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child protection, free movement of persons, freedom of movement, imprisonment, penal institution, public safety, sexual offence








C_2016251EN.01000401.xml










11.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 7 April 2016 — E v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava
(Case C-193/16)
(2016/C 251/05)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant/appellant: E

Defendant/respondent: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava

Question referred

In accordance with Article 27 [(1) and (2)] of Directive 2004/38/EC, (1) does the appellant, sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment for repeated offences of child abuse, represent a genuine and present threat to public security, bearing in mind that he is detained in prison and, having served six years, has several years left to serve before being released?


(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).
Case T-364/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — ADR Center v Commission (Application for interim measures — Arbitration clause — Agreements concluded for the purpose of carrying out projects subsidised by the European Union within the framework of the ‘Civil Justice’ programme — Enforceable decision of the Commission to recover the sums paid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, competence of the institution, debt, executive competence, interest








C_2016191EN.01003101.xml










30.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/31





Order of the President of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — ADR Center v Commission
(Case T-364/15 R)
((Application for interim measures - Arbitration clause - Agreements concluded for the purpose of carrying out projects subsidised by the European Union within the framework of the ‘Civil Justice’ programme - Enforceable decision of the Commission to recover the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))
(2016/C 191/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the enforcement of Commission Decision C(2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015 concerning the recovery of a sum of EUR 432 637,97, plus interest, owed by ADR Center Srl with reference to debit notes Nos 3241408192 and 3241409206 relating to EUR 155 507,97 and EUR 277 130 respectively.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 22 January 2016 is cancelled in so far as it relates to Case T-364/15 R.










3.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-717/15: Order of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — Drugsrus v EMA
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: free movement of goods, import (EU), labelling, market access, medicinal product, product designation








C_2016200EN.01003202.xml










6.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/32





Order of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — Drugsrus v EMA
(Case T-717/15) (1)

(2016/C 200/46)
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.
Case C-315/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Marchon Germany GmbH v Yvonne Karaszkiewicz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Self-employed commercial agents — Directive 86/653/EEC — Article 17(2) — Indemnity in respect of customers — Conditions for granting — Acquisition of new customers — Concept of ‘new customers’ — Principal’s customers purchasing, for the first time, goods which the commercial agent was assigned to sell)
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customers, purchase, remuneration of work, sales representative








C_2016211EN.01000801.xml










13.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/8






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Marchon Germany GmbH v Yvonne Karaszkiewicz
(Case C-315/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Self-employed commercial agents - Directive 86/653/EEC - Article 17(2) - Indemnity in respect of customers - Conditions for granting - Acquisition of new customers - Concept of ‘new customers’ - Principal’s customers purchasing, for the first time, goods which the commercial agent was assigned to sell))
(2016/C 211/08)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Marchon Germany GmbH

Defendant: Yvonne Karaszkiewicz

Operative part of the judgment

The first indent of Article 17(2)(a) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents must be interpreted as meaning that customers brought in by the commercial agent for the goods that he has been assigned by the principal to sell must be regarded as new customers, within the meaning of that provision, in the case where, even though those customers already had business relations with that principal in relation to other goods, the sale, by that agent, of the first goods required the establishment of specific business relations, this being a matter for the referring court to determine.


(1)  OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.
Case C-196/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche (Italy) lodged on 7 April 2016 — Comune di Corridonia v Provincia di Macerata, Provincia di Macerata Settore 10 –Ambiente
Date: 2016-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: environmental impact, environmental protection, impact study, industrial project








C_2016251EN.01000501.xml










11.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/5





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche (Italy) lodged on 7 April 2016 — Comune di Corridonia v Provincia di Macerata, Provincia di Macerata Settore 10 –Ambiente
(Case C-196/16)
(2016/C 251/06)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Comune di Corridonia

Defendants: Provincia di Macerata, Provincia di Macerata Settore 10 –Ambiente

Question referred

On a constructive interpretation of Article 191 TFEU and Article 2 of Directive 2011/92/EU, (1) is it compatible with EU law to proceed with the verification of whether an environmental impact assessment needs to be undertaken (and possibly thereafter to carry out an environmental impact assessment) after the construction of the plant where the consent has been annulled by the national court due to a failure to verify whether the environmental impact assessment was needed, because such a verification had been excluded on the basis of a national law which was contrary to EU law?


(1)  Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 2012 L 26, p. 1).