do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-135/16: Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Charente-Maritime Deux-Sèvres v ECB
Date: 2016-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: credit institution, financial legislation, management audit, national law, right of establishment








C_2016175EN.01003201.xml










17.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/32





Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Charente-Maritime Deux-Sèvres v ECB
(Case T-135/16)
(2016/C 175/37)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Charente-Maritime Deux-Sèvres (Saintes, France) (represented by: H. Savoie, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/101) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français).





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-133/16, Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence v ECB.
Case T-130/16: Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Coesia v EUIPO (Depiction of a circular shape formed by two oblique, symmetrical red lines)
Date: 2016-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mechanical engineering, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016165EN.01001902.xml










10.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/19





Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Coesia v EUIPO (Depiction of a circular shape formed by two oblique, symmetrical red lines)
(Case T-130/16)
(2016/C 165/22)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Coesia SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Depiction of a circular shape formed by two oblique, symmetrical red lines) — Application for registration No 13 681 151

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2016 in Case R 1933/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Corrigendum to the Order of the General Court of 21 January 2016 — BR IP Holder v OHIM — Greyleg Investments (HOKEY POKEY) (Case T-62/14) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark HOKEY POKEY — Unregistered earlier national word mark — Proof of use — Right to prohibit use of the mark sought — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right of a Member State — Obligation to state reasons — Raised by the Court of its own motion) (OJ C 90, 7.3.2016, p. 15)
Date: 2016-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016111EN.01004601.xml










29.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/46





Corrigendum to the Order of the General Court of 21 January 2016 — BR IP Holder v OHIM — Greyleg Investments (HOKEY POKEY)
(Case T-62/14)

(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark HOKEY POKEY — Unregistered earlier national word mark — Proof of use — Right to prohibit use of the mark sought — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right of a Member State — Obligation to state reasons — Raised by the Court of its own motion)

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 90 of 7.3.2016, p. 15
)
(2016/C 111/58)
The OJ Communication in Case T-62/14, BR IP Holder v OHIM — Greyleg Investments (HOKEY POKEY) should read as follows:


‘Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2016 — BR IP Holder v OHIM — Greyleg Investments (HOKEY POKEY)
(Case T-62/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark HOKEY POKEY - Unregistered earlier national word mark - Proof of use - Right to prohibit use of the mark sought - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Right of a Member State - Obligation to state reasons - Raised by the Court of its own motion))
(2016/C 090/20)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: BR IP Holder LLC (Canton, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: F. Traub, lawyer and C. Rohsler, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Greyleg Investments Ltd (Baltonsborough, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2013 (Case R 1091/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between BR IP Holder LLC and Greyleg Investments Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 November 2013 (Case R 1091/2012-4);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by BR IP Holder LLC.’








(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
Case T-134/16: Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Nord Midi-Pyrénées v ECB
Date: 2016-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: credit institution, financial legislation, management audit, national law, right of establishment








C_2016175EN.01003101.xml










17.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/31





Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Nord Midi-Pyrénées v ECB
(Case T-134/16)
(2016/C 175/36)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Nord Midi-Pyrénées (Albi, France) (represented by: H. Savoie, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/100) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français).





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-133/16, Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence v ECB.