do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-84/15: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — the Netherlands) — Sonos Europe BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Customs union and Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 8517, 8518, 8519, 8527 and 8543 — Stand-alone device designed to retrieve, receive and stream digital audio files in the form of amplified sound)
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, customs union, sound reproduction equipment, specification of tariff heading








C_2016156EN.01001401.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/14






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — the Netherlands) — Sonos Europe BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
(Case C-84/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Customs union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 8517, 8518, 8519, 8527 and 8543 - Stand-alone device designed to retrieve, receive and stream digital audio files in the form of amplified sound))
(2016/C 156/19)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sonos Europe BV

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting, successively, from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1031/2008 of 19 September 2008 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 948/2009 of 30 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that a stand-alone device designed to retrieve, receive and stream digital audio files in the form of amplified sound, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, must, subject to the referring court’s assessment of all of the facts which it has available to it, be classified under tariff heading 8519 of that nomenclature.


(1)  
            OJ C 146, 4.5.2015.
Case C-232/14: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Portmeirion Group UK Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 — Validity — Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China — Product concerned — Product under consideration — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, household article, import (EU), originating product








C_2016156EN.01000401.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/4






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Portmeirion Group UK Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
(Case C-232/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 - Validity - Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China - Product concerned - Product under consideration - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 156/04)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Portmeirion Group UK Ltd

Respondent: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question referred has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China.


(1)  
            OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016101EN.01000401.xml










17.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 101/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

16 March 2016
(2016/C 101/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1064 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,68 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4565 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78730 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2235 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0960 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5020 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,050 




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,43 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3023 




RON


Romanian leu


4,4765 




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2362 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4911 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4798 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5875 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6809 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5315 




KRW


South Korean won


1 321,98 




ZAR


South African rand


17,9375 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2180 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5655 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 679,16 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6169 




PHP


Philippine peso


51,752 




RUB


Russian rouble


78,6080 




THB


Thai baht


38,800 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2224 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,8495 




INR


Indian rupee


74,3888 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom (OJ L 13, 17.1.2014)
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: health control, health risk, ionising radiation, medical diagnosis, occupational safety, radiation protection, radiobiology








L_2016072EN.01006901.xml










17.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 72/69







Corrigendum to Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 13 of 17 January 2014
)


On page 26, point (d)(iii) of Article 58:
for:







‘(iii)


for other medical radiological practices not covered by points (a) and (b), a medical physics expert shall be involved, as appropriate, for consultation and advice on matters relating to radiation protection concerning medical exposure.’,





read:







‘(iii)


for other medical radiological practices not covered by points (i) and (ii), a medical physics expert shall be involved, as appropriate, for consultation and advice on matters relating to radiation protection concerning medical exposure;’.
Addendum to reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Secretaries/Clerks (grades SC 1 and SC 2)
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, assistant, competition (EU), secretarial staff








CA2016101EN.01000401.xml










17.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 101/4





ADDENDUM TO RESERVE LIST
OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST-SC/03/15
SECRETARIES/CLERKS (GRADES SC 1 AND SC 2)
(2016/C 101 A/03)
 
2)   FINANCIAL SUPPORT


Grade SC 2







STEFANOVA TASHKOVA


Svetoslava




This addendum will be valid until 30 June 2017.
Case T-78/15: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2016 — Mudhook Marketing v OHIM (IPVanish) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark IPVanish — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2016156EN.01004001.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/40






Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2016 — Mudhook Marketing v OHIM (IPVanish)
(Case T-78/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark IPVanish - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 156/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mudhook Marketing, Inc. (Winter Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: H. Eckermann and A. Dellmeier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 1417/2014-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign IPVanish as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mudhook Marketing, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.
Case C-286/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 — European Parliament v European Commission (Action for annulment — Article 290 TFEU — Concepts of ‘amending’ and ‘supplementing’ — Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 — Article 21(3) — Scope of the power conferred on the European Commission — Need to adopt a separate legislative act — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014)
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, delegated regulation, powers of the institutions (EU), trans-European network, transfer of competence, transport network








C_2016156EN.01000801.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/8






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 — European Parliament v European Commission
(Case C-286/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Article 290 TFEU - Concepts of ‘amending’ and ‘supplementing’ - Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 - Article 21(3) - Scope of the power conferred on the European Commission - Need to adopt a separate legislative act - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014))
(2016/C 156/10)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: L.G. Knudsen, A. Troupiotis and M. Menegatti, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Martenczuk, M. Konstantinidis and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Michoel and Z. Kupčová, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 of 7 January 2014 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility;










2.


Orders that the effects of Delegated Regulation No 275/2014 be maintained until the entry into force, within a reasonable period, which may not exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new act intended to replace it;










3.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;










4.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.
Case C-156/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2016 — Tigers GmbH v Hauptzollamt Landshut
Date: 2016-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, ceramics, customs, customs formalities, household article, invoicing








C_2016211EN.01002901.xml










13.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/29






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2016 — Tigers GmbH v Hauptzollamt Landshut
(Case C-156/16)
(2016/C 211/37)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Tigers GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Landshut

Questions referred







I.


Does Article 1(3) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 (1) of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China allow a valid commercial invoice presented for the purposes of the initial fixing of a definitive anti-dumping duty to be submitted retrospectively where all the other conditions necessary for obtaining an individual anti-dumping duty rate are satisfied?










II.


In the event that the first question is answered in the negative:
Does Article 78 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2) of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 (3) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, preclude the customs authority, in the course of a revision procedure, from refusing to refund an anti-dumping duty on the ground that the declarant did not present a valid commercial invoice until after the customs declaration had been made?






(1)  OJ 2013 L 131, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 2000 L 311, p. 17).