do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-267/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — Buzzi Unicem SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Market for ‘cement and related products’ — Administrative procedure — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 18(1) and (3) — Decision requesting information — Statement of reasons — Clarification of the application)
Date: 2016-03-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to EU information, administrative procedure, cartel, cement, competition policy, restriction on competition








C_2016156EN.01000701.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/7






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — Buzzi Unicem SpA v European Commission
(Case C-267/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Market for ‘cement and related products’ - Administrative procedure - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 18(1) and (3) - Decision requesting information - Statement of reasons - Clarification of the application))
(2016/C 156/08)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Buzzi Unicem SpA (represented by: C. Osti, A. Prastaro and A. Sodano, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 March 2014 in Buzzi Unicem v Commission (T-297/11, EU:T:2014:122);










2.


Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 2356 final of 30 March 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39520 — Cement and related products);










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Buzzi Unicem SpA with respect to both the proceedings at first instance in Case T-297/11 and the appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.
Case C-142/15 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — SolarWorld AG v Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA, European Commission (Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 263 TFEU — Criterion for direct concern — Appeal manifestly unfounded — Dumping — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 8 — Offer of a price undertaking by Chinese exporting producers — Acceptance by the Commission — Exemption of anti-dumping duties — Action against the acceptance decision — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2016-03-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, semi-metal, solar collector








C_2016200EN.01000201.xml










6.6.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/2





Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — SolarWorld AG v Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA, European Commission
(Case C-142/15 P) (1)

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 263 TFEU - Criterion for direct concern - Appeal manifestly unfounded - Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 8 - Offer of a price undertaking by Chinese exporting producers - Acceptance by the Commission - Exemption of anti-dumping duties - Action against the acceptance decision - Inadmissibility))
(2016/C 200/02)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: SolarWorld AG (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


SolarWorld AG shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 2(2) of Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels
Date: 2016-03-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, exchange of information, gas appliance, pressure equipment, technical regulations








C_2016094EN.01000601.xml










10.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/6





Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 2(2) of Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels
(2016/C 94/03)

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission from the Member States)












Country


Gas family


Wobbe index (gross) in


Supply pressure in mbar




MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

(0 °C)


MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

(15 °C)


Min.


Nom.


Max.




Denmark


FIRST
Group a


23,60-26,20 MJ/m3

6,56-7,28 kWh/m3



22,37-24,84 MJ/m3

6,21-6,90 kWh/m3



6 (1)



8 (1)



15 (1)





SECOND
Group H


50,76-55,80 MJ/m3
 (2)
 (3)

14,10-15,5 kWh/m3
 (2)
 (3)



48,12-52,90 MJ/m3
 (2)
 (3)

13,37-14,69 kWh/m3
 (2)
 (3)



17 (1)



20 (1)



25 (1)





THIRD
Group B/P


76,90-92,10 MJ/m3

21,36-25,58 kWh/m3



72,90-87,31 MJ/m3

20,25-24,25 kWh/m3



25 (1)



30 (1)



35 (1)







(1)  Inlet pressure for the appliances in mbar.

(2)  Abnormal supply conditions: provided that the Danish Safety Technology Authority has approved a special contingency plan allowing supply in an abnormal supply range, the Wobbe index can be between 50,04 and 50,76 MJ/mn
3 (0 °C)/13,9-14,1 kWh/mn
3 (0 °C).

(3)  It is permitted to inject biogas upgraded to natural gas quality, i.e. upgraded biogas with a Wobbe index between a minimum of 50,76 MJ/mn
3 (0 °C)/and a maximum of 55,80 MJ/mn
3 (0 °C).