do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-179/15: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft. (References for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1) — Advertisements relating to a third party accessible on the internet — Unauthorised use of the mark — Advertisements published online without the knowledge and without the consent of that third party or maintained online despite the opposition of that third party — Action of the trade mark proprietor against that third party)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, advertising, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016156EN.01001902.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/19






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft.
(Case C-179/15) (1)

((References for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 5(1) - Advertisements relating to a third party accessible on the internet - Unauthorised use of the mark - Advertisements published online without the knowledge and without the consent of that third party or maintained online despite the opposition of that third party - Action of the trade mark proprietor against that third party))
(2016/C 156/27)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Daimler AG

Defendant: Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that a third party, who is named in an advertisement on a website, which contains a sign identical or similar to a trade mark in such a way as to give the impression that there is a commercial relationship between him and the proprietor of the trade mark, does not make use of that sign that may be prohibited by that proprietor under that provision, where that advertisement has not been placed by that third party or on his behalf or, if that advertisement has been placed by that third party or on his behalf with the consent of the proprietor, where that third party has expressly requested the operator of that website, from whom the third party ordered the advertisement, to remove the advertisement or the reference to the mark contained therein.


(1)  
            OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.
Case C-144/15: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Customs Support Holland BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 2304, 2308 and 2309 — Classification of a soya protein concentrate)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, animal feedingstuffs, common customs tariff, concentrated product, specification of tariff heading








C_2016156EN.01001701.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/17






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Customs Support Holland BV
(Case C-144/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 2304, 2308 and 2309 - Classification of a soya protein concentrate))
(2016/C 156/23)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: Customs Support Holland BV

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 948/2009 of 30 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that a soya protein concentrate, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, comes under heading 2309 of that nomenclature.


(1)  
            OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016081EN.01000301.xml










3.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

2 March 2016
(2016/C 81/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0856




JPY


Japanese yen


124,07




DKK


Danish krone


7,4580




GBP


Pound sterling


0,77410




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3385




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0845




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4220




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,046




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,96




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3297




RON


Romanian leu


4,4585




TRY


Turkish lira


3,1903




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5010




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4595




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4400




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6404




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5226




KRW


South Korean won


1 334,29




ZAR


South African rand


17,0097




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1125




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6040




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 445,17




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5215




PHP


Philippine peso


51,327




RUB


Russian rouble


80,0729




THB


Thai baht


38,615




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2523




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4214




INR


Indian rupee


73,3115






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.