do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-138/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — Teva Pharma BV, Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA), European Commission (Appeal — Orphan medicinal products — Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 — Refusal to grant marketing authorisation for the generic version of the orphan medicinal product ‘imatinib mesylate’)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cancer, market approval, medicinal product








C_2016156EN.01001601.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/16






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — Teva Pharma BV, Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA), European Commission
(Case C-138/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Orphan medicinal products - Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 - Refusal to grant marketing authorisation for the generic version of the orphan medicinal product ‘imatinib mesylate’))
(2016/C 156/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Teva Pharma BV, Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV (represented by: K. Bacon QC, E. Mackenzie, Barrister, and G. Morgan, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: N. Rampal Olmedo, M. Tovar Gomis, S. Marino and T. Jabłoński, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and M. Šimerdová, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Teva Pharma BV and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Republic of Poland of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU environmental policy, Poland, action programme, air quality, industrial pollution, prevention of pollution, reduction of gas emissions, waste incineration








C_2016089EN.01000602.xml










5.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/6





Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Republic of Poland of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
(2016/C 89/08)
On 3 March 2016, the Commission adopted Decision C(2016) 1245 on the notification by the Republic of Poland of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (1).
This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee


(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
Case C-12/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Malta (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 46b — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 54 — Old-age pensions — Rules against overlapping — Persons entitled to an old-age pension under the rules of one Member State and to a civil-service pension under the rules of another Member State — Reduction in the amount of the old-age pension)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, civil servant, pension scheme, social-security harmonisation








C_2016156EN.01000201.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/2






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Malta
(Case C-12/14) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 46b - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 54 - Old-age pensions - Rules against overlapping - Persons entitled to an old-age pension under the rules of one Member State and to a civil-service pension under the rules of another Member State - Reduction in the amount of the old-age pension))
(2016/C 156/02)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: A. Buhagiar and P. Grech, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer and G. Hesse, acting as Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: J. Beeko, S. Behzadi-Spencer and V. Kaye, acting as Agents, assisted by T. de la Mare QC)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;










3.


Orders the Republic of Austria and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 159, 26.5.2014.
Case T-778/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Ugly v OHIM — Group Lottuss (COYOTE UGLY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark COYOTE UGLY — Relative grounds for refusal — Revocation of the earlier Community word mark — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No non-registered mark — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rejection of the opposition)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cultural event, leisure, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016136EN.01003201.xml










18.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 136/32





Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Ugly v OHIM — Group Lottuss (COYOTE UGLY)
(Case T-778/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark COYOTE UGLY - Relative grounds for refusal - Revocation of the earlier Community word mark - Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No non-registered mark - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rejection of the opposition))
(2016/C 136/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ugly, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: T. St Quintin, Barrister, K. Gilbert and C. Mackey, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Group Lottuss Corp., SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 September 2014 (Case R 1369/2013-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Ugly Inc. and Group Lottuss Corp.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ugly, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.
Case T-15/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Simet v Commission (State Aid — retroactive public service compensation granted by the Italian authorities — Interregional coach transport services provided between 1987 and 2003 — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Maintenance of a public service obligation — Grant of compensation — Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, public transport, reimbursement of aid








C_2016136EN.01002901.xml










18.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 136/29





Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Simet v Commission
(Case T-15/14) (1)

((State Aid - retroactive public service compensation granted by the Italian authorities - Interregional coach transport services provided between 1987 and 2003 - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Maintenance of a public service obligation - Grant of compensation - Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69))
(2016/C 136/40)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Simet SpA (Rossano Calabro, Italy) (represented by: A. Clarizia, C. Varrone and P. Clarizia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, D. Grespan and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul Commission Decision 2014/201/EU of 2 October 2013 on compensation to be paid to SIMET SpA for public transport services provided between 1987 and 2003 (state aid measure SA.33037 (2012/C) — Italy) (OJ 2014 L 114, p. 67).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Simet SpA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU environmental policy, Romania, action programme, air quality, industrial pollution, prevention of pollution, reduction of gas emissions, waste incineration








C_2016089EN.01000603.xml










5.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/6





Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
(2016/C 89/09)
On 3 March 2016, the Commission adopted Decision C(2016) 1249 on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (1).
This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee


(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7745 — Fortum/Lietuvos energija/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, gas supply, heating, merger control








C_2016081EN.01000101.xml










3.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7745 — Fortum/Lietuvos energija/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 81/01)
On 23 November 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7745. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7724 — ASL/Arianespace) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, military equipment, provision of services, space transport








C_2016081EN.01000201.xml










3.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/2





Initiation of proceedings
(Case M.7724 — ASL/Arianespace)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 81/03)
On 26 February 2016, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7724 — ASL/Arianespace, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-675/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Spain v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain — Flat rate financial corrections — Specific financial corrections — Extension of the financial correction to a period after the communication provided for in Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EAGGF Guarantee Section, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture








C_2016136EN.01003101.xml










18.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 136/31





Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-675/14) (1)

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain - Flat rate financial corrections - Specific financial corrections - Extension of the financial correction to a period after the communication provided for in Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006))
(2016/C 136/44)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, abogado del Estado)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Martín and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: I. Kalniņš and D. Pelše, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2014/458/EU of 9 July 2014 excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2005 L 205, p. 62) in so far as it concerns certain expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in the amount of EUR 2 713 208,07.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.










3.


Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.
Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU environmental policy, Spain, action programme, air quality, industrial pollution, prevention of pollution, reduction of gas emissions, waste incineration








C_2016089EN.01000601.xml










5.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/6





Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
(2016/C 89/07)
On 3 March 2016, the Commission adopted Decision C(2016) 1241 on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (1).
This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee


(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
Case C-26/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Common organisation of agricultural markets — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 — Fifth indent of Part D of Section VI of Part B 2 of Annex I — Fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors — Citrus fruits — Conditions for marketing — Provisions concerning marking — Indications of preserving agents or other chemical substances used in post-harvest processing)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agro-industry, chemical product, citrus fruit, common organisation of markets, consumer information, labelling, preservative








C_2016156EN.01001202.xml










2.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/12






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission
(Case C-26/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Common organisation of agricultural markets - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 - Fifth indent of Part D of Section VI of Part B 2 of Annex I - Fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors - Citrus fruits - Conditions for marketing - Provisions concerning marking - Indications of preserving agents or other chemical substances used in post-harvest processing))
(2016/C 156/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima, I. Galindo Martín and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.
Grant award notice — Call for proposals — ref: GP/DSI/ReferNet_FPA/002/15 — ReferNet — Cedefop’s European Network for Information on Vocational Education and Training (VET)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: Cedefop
Subjects: Cedefop, economic support, invitation to tender








C_2016081EN.01001101.xml










3.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/11





GRANT AWARD NOTICE
CALL FOR PROPOSALS — ref: GP/DSI/ReferNet_FPA/002/15
ReferNet — Cedefop’s European Network for Information on Vocational Education and Training (VET)
(2016/C 81/07)
1.   Contracting authority






Cedefop — European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training




Attn: Mr R. Martens




123 Europe Street




PO Box 22427




55102 Thessaloniki




GREECE




Contact point:




Ms Clotilde Assumel-Lurdin




Tel. +30 2310490287




Fax +30 2310490028




Email: c4t-services@cedefop.europa.eu




Previous publication: OJ C 366, 5.11.2015, p. 8.
2.   Grant award














Beneficiary name


Address


Framework partnership agreement number


Framework partnership agreement duration


Framework partnership agreement signature date


Specific Grant agreement number (2016)


Specific Grant agreement duration


Specific Grant agreement signature date


Grant amount (EUR)




Finnish National Board of Education — FNBE


Hakaniemenranta 6, 00530 Helsinki, Finland


No 2015-FPA1/GP/DSI/ReferNet_FPA/002/15


4 years


4.1.2016


No 2016-0031


12 months


4.1.2016


33 600,00




National Organisation for the Certification of Qualifications and Vocational Guidance — EOPPEP


41 Ethnikis Antistaseos Avenue, 14234 Athens, Greece


No 2015-FPA3/GP/DSI/ReferNet_FPA/002/15


4 years


23.12.2015


No 2016-0032


12 months


23.12.2015


33 600,00




Directorate of Education (Menntamálastofnun)


Vikurhvarfl 3, 203 Kopavogur, Iceland


No 2015-FPA2/GP/DSI/ReferNet_FPA/002/15


4 years


4.1.2016


No 2016-0033


12 months


4.1.2016


23 615,00




National Office of Vocational Education and Training and Adult Learning — NSZFH-NOVETAL


Baross u. 52, 1085 Budapest, Hungary


No 2015-FPA4/GP/DSI/ReferNet_FPA/002/15


4 years


15.1.2016


No 2016-0035


12 months


22.1.2016


32 550,00




The procedure has been declared unfruitful for Malta (no partner was selected).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7916 — Macquarie Capital/Ivanhoe/Logos Australia/Logos China) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-03-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, investment company, merger control, property development, real estate business








C_2016081EN.01000102.xml










3.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7916 — Macquarie Capital/Ivanhoe/Logos Australia/Logos China)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 81/02)
On 25 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7916. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.