do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7907 — Sphinx/CVC Capital Partners/RAC) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, insurance company, investment company, maintenance, merger control, provision of services








C_2016064EN.01000202.xml










19.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 64/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7907 — Sphinx/CVC Capital Partners/RAC)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 64/03)
On 16 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7907. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7894 — Cinven/ERGO Italia) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control








C_2016064EN.01000201.xml










19.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 64/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7894 — Cinven/ERGO Italia)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 64/02)
On 9 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7894. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009)
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Kazakhstan, anti-dumping duty, common agricultural policy, dumping, import (EU), third country








L_2016044EN.01002002.xml










19.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 44/20







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 22 December 2009
)


On page 68, Article 16(1), second sentence:
for:

               ‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply a verification visit may not be carried out.’,
read:

               ‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply, the Commission may choose not to carry out a verification visit.’.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016064EN.01000301.xml










19.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 64/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

18 February 2016
(2016/C 64/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1084




JPY


Japanese yen


126,17




DKK


Danish krone


7,4635




GBP


Pound sterling


0,77143




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4014




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1028




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5235




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,030




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,49




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3817




RON


Romanian leu


4,4615




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2884




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5496




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5168




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6222




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6728




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5564




KRW


South Korean won


1 362,20




ZAR


South African rand


17,0657




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2242




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6175




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 951,15




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6237




PHP


Philippine peso


52,695




RUB


Russian rouble


83,4772




THB


Thai baht


39,422




BRL


Brazilian real


4,4527




MXN


Mexican peso


20,2110




INR


Indian rupee


75,9461






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-53/14: Judgment of the General Court of 19 February 2016 — Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Reimbursement of a portion of the amounts paid and flat-rate compensation — No need to adjudicate in part — Costs eligible for EU funding — Penalty clause — Manifestly excessive character)
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, damages, eligibility criteria, reimbursement of aid








C_2016111EN.01001901.xml










29.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/19





Judgment of the General Court of 19 February 2016 — Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik v Commission
(Case T-53/14) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Reimbursement of a portion of the amounts paid and flat-rate compensation - No need to adjudicate in part - Costs eligible for EU funding - Penalty clause - Manifestly excessive character))
(2016/C 111/22)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH (Ottobrunn, Germany) (represented by: initially, M. Núñez Müller and T. Becker, and, subsequently, M. Núñez Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a declaration, first, that the Commission is not entitled to require the applicant to reimburse advances paid under three contracts and, secondly, that the applicant is not required to pay flat-rate compensation to the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the second and third heads of claim of the action;










2.


Declares that the sums payable as flat-rate compensation by Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH are to be reduced by an amount equivalent to 10 % of the advances to be reimbursed under the contracts concerning the projects HyWays, HyApproval and HarmonHy;










3.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










4.


Orders Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik and the European Commission to bear their own respective costs.






(1)  OJ C 129, 28.4.2014.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 385/96 of 29 January 1996 on protection against injurious pricing of vessels (OJ L 56, 6.3.1996)
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: export price, indemnification, infringement procedure (EU), price control, shipbuilding, vessel








L_2016044EN.01002003.xml










19.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 44/20







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 385/96 of 29 January 1996 on protection against injurious pricing of vessels

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 56 of 6 March 1996
)


On page 31, Article 11(1), second sentence:
for:

               ‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply, a verification visit may not be carried out.’,
read:

               ‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply, the Commission may choose not to carry out a verification visit.’.
Communication from the Commission establishing formal recognition that a certain number of acts of Union law in the field of agriculture have become obsolete
Date: 2016-02-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Community acquis, EU act, common agricultural policy, repeal








C_2016064EN.01000101.xml










19.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 64/1





Communication from the Commission establishing formal recognition that a certain number of acts of Union law in the field of agriculture have become obsolete
(2016/C 64/01)

List of acts to be removed from the active acquis



Dried fodder

Commission Regulation (EC) No 382/2005
(OJ L 61, 8.3.2005, p. 4).

Hemp and seed

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2514/78
(OJ L 301, 28.10.1978, p. 10).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3164/89
(OJ L 307, 24.10.1989, p. 22).

Hops

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3889/87
(OJ L 365, 24.12.1987, p. 41).

Olive oil

Commission Regulation (EC) No 528/1999
(OJ L 62, 11.3.1999, p. 8).

Silkworm

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1496/77
(OJ L 167, 5.7.1977, p. 8).

Sugar

Regulation (EEC) No 100/72 of the Commission
(OJ L 12, 15.1.1972, p. 15).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 189/77
(OJ L 25, 29.1.1977, p. 27).