do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-59/16 P: Appeal brought on 13 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-9/14 De Nicola v EIB
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, indemnification, promotion, psychological harassment, staff assessment








C_2016111EN.01003701.xml










29.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/37





Appeal brought on 13 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-9/14 De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-59/16 P)
(2016/C 111/44)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo de Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


Uphold the present appeal and, partially reversing the judgment under appeal, annul points 2 and 3 of the operative part, together with paragraphs 58 to 63 of the judgment itself;










—


Consequently, annul the guidelines established for the year 2012 or declare that they are no longer applicable; order the EIB to compensate Dr De Nicola for the damage suffered, as requested in the application initiating proceedings or, in the alternative, refer the case to another Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal in order that it may, in a different formation, give a fresh decision on the annulled paragraphs;










—


Order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The present appeal is brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 18 December 2015 in De Nicola v European Investment Bank (F-9/14).
The grounds of appeal and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-55/16 P De Nicola v European Investment Bank.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7869 — Macquarie/Dolomiti Energia/Hydro Dolomiti Enel) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, investment company, merger control








C_2016058EN.01000201.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7869 — Macquarie/Dolomiti Energia/Hydro Dolomiti Enel)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 58/03)
On 8 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7869. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: India, Indonesia, Malaysia, anti-dumping duty, chemical alcohol, import (EU), originating product








C_2016058EN.01000801.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/8





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2016/C 58/07)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain fatty alcohols and their blends


India
Indonesia
Malaysia


Anti-dumping duty


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ L 293, 11.11.2011, p. 1).


12.11.2016






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016058EN.01000401.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

12 February 2016
(2016/C 58/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1275




JPY


Japanese yen


127,07




DKK


Danish krone


7,4642




GBP


Pound sterling


0,77735




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4550




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0989




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6773




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,063




HUF


Hungarian forint


310,13




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4109




RON


Romanian leu


4,4741




TRY


Turkish lira


3,3030




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5901




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5698




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7816




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6965




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5756




KRW


South Korean won


1 359,98




ZAR


South African rand


17,9194




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4114




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6320




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 211,54




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6955




PHP


Philippine peso


53,561




RUB


Russian rouble


89,5851




THB


Thai baht


40,139




BRL


Brazilian real


4,5087




MXN


Mexican peso


21,6852




INR


Indian rupee


76,9418






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Egypt, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2016058EN.01000301.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/3





Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt
(2016/C 58/04)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt.
The Council is considering a renewal of the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/172/CFSP. The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011. The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 19 February 2016, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received before 29 February 2016 will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 2 of Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.


(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7926 — Goldman Sachs/Northgate) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information technology industry, investment company, merger control








C_2016058EN.01000101.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7926 — Goldman Sachs/Northgate)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 58/01)
On 3 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7926. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-60/16 P: Appeal brought on 13 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-55/13 De Nicola v EIB
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, indemnification, promotion, staff assessment








C_2016111EN.01003702.xml










29.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/37





Appeal brought on 13 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-55/13 De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-60/16 P)
(2016/C 111/45)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo de Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


Uphold the present appeal and, partially reversing the judgment under appeal, annul points 2 and 3 of the operative part, together with paragraphs 59 to 64 of the judgment itself;










—


Consequently, annul the guidelines established for the year 2011 or declare that they are no longer applicable; order the EIB to compensate Dr De Nicola for the damage suffered, as requested in the application initiating proceedings or, in the alternative, refer the case to another Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal in order that it may, in a different formation, give a fresh decision on the annulled paragraphs;










—


Order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The present appeal is brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 18 December 2015 in De Nicola v European Investment Bank (F-55/13).
The grounds of appeal and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-55/16 P De Nicola v European Investment Bank.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7850 — EDF/CGN/NNB Group of Companies) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, holding company, merger control








C_2016058EN.01004101.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/41





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7850 — EDF/CGN/NNB Group of Companies)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 58/12)






1.


On 4 February 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Électricité de France SA (‘EDF’, of France) and China General Nuclear Power Corporation (‘CGN’, of China), controlled by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China (‘Central SASAC’), will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a group of three nuclear newbuild companies (‘NNB Group’, of the United Kingdom): NNB Generation Company HPC Limited (‘HPC Genco’), NNB Generation Company SZC Limited (‘SZC Genco’) and NNB Generation Company BRB Limited (‘BRB Genco’).










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


CGN is a Chinese company primarily active in the development, construction and operation of nuclear power plants and renewable energy plants in China,










—


the EDF group is mainly active in electricity markets in France and abroad. In the UK, EDF is mainly active in electricity generation, as well as wholesale supply (including trading) and retail supply of electricity,










—


NNB Group consist of three holding and generating companies responsible for the construction and operation of the Hinkley Point (HPC), Sizewell (SZC) and Bradwell (BRB) newbuild nuclear power plants.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7850 — EDF/CGN/NNB Group of Companies, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7865 — LOV Group Invest/De Agostini/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: audiovisual industry, economic concentration, holding company, merger control, television








C_2016058EN.01000102.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7865 — LOV Group Invest/De Agostini/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 58/02)
On 20 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7865. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7758 — Hutchison 3G Italy/WIND/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, merger control, telecommunications industry








C_2016058EN.01004001.xml










13.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/40





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7758 — Hutchison 3G Italy/WIND/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 58/11)






1.


On 5 February 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Hutchison Europe Telecommunications SARL (Luxembourg), controlled by CK Hutchison Holdings Limited (‘CKHH’, Hong Kong), and the undertaking VimpelCom Luxembourg Holdings SARL (Luxembourg), controlled by VimpelCom Ltd (‘VCL’, Bermuda) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly-created joint venture (the ‘JV’, Luxembourg) by way of contribution to the JV of their respective business activities in Italy.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


CKHH is a multi-national group headquartered in Hong Kong and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Limited. CKHH has five core businesses: ports and related services; retail; infrastructure; energy; and telecommunications.










—


VCL is a multi-national group headquartered in Amsterdam and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. VCL provides voice and data services through a range of traditional and broadband mobile and fixed technologies in 14 countries under several different brands.










—


The JV will provide mobile and fixed telecommunications services in Italy.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7758 — Hutchison 3G Italy/WIND/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).