do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2016-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2016048EN.01000101.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 048/01)

Last publication


OJ C 38, 1.2.2016


Past publications


OJ C 27, 25.1.2016


OJ C 16, 18.1.2016


OJ C 7, 11.1.2016


OJ C 429, 21.12.2015


OJ C 414, 14.12.2015


OJ C 406, 7.12.2015

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case T-57/16: Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)
Date: 2016-02-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models








C_2016118EN.01003501.xml










4.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/35





Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)
(Case T-57/16)
(2016/C 118/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Chanel SAS (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Li Jing Zhou (Fuenlabrada, Spain) and Golden Rose 999 Srl (Rome, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design representation of an ornament — Community Design No 1 689 027-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2015 in Case R 2346/2014-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare the contested design invalid;










—


order EUIPO, and any other parties or interveners liable to appear in the present proceedings in support of the contested decision, to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.