do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-251/15 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 — Emsibeth SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Community trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative mark Nael — Opposition by the proprietor of prior Community word mark Mc Neal — Refusal of registration — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Determination of the relevant public — Assessment of the comparison of the goods, the similarity of the signs and the likelihood of confusion)
Date: 2016-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016136EN.01000401.xml










18.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 136/4





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 — Emsibeth SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
(Case C-251/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the figurative mark Nael - Opposition by the proprietor of prior Community word mark Mc Neal - Refusal of registration - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Determination of the relevant public - Assessment of the comparison of the goods, the similarity of the signs and the likelihood of confusion))
(2016/C 136/05)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Emsibeth SpA (represented by: A. Arpaia, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Emsibeth SpA shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.
Information relating to the entry into force of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office
Date: 2016-02-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU relations, European Union Agency for Asylum, Liechtenstein, observer, right of asylum








L_2016028EN.01000101.xml










4.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 28/1







Information relating to the entry into force of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office

The Arrangement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office entered into force on 1 January 2016, the procedure provided for in Article 13(2) of the Arrangement having been completed on 22 December 2015.
Case C-63/16 P: Appeal brought on 4 February 2016 by Actega Terra GmbH against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 23 November 2015 in Case T-766/14 Actega Terra GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2016-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, paints and varnishes, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016260EN.01001501.xml










18.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/15





Appeal brought on 4 February 2016 by Actega Terra GmbH against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 23 November 2015 in Case T-766/14 Actega Terra GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-63/16 P)
(2016/C 260/19)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Actega Terra GmbH (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen
By order of 24 May 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case C-194/15: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino — Italy) — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Direct taxation — Imposition of dividends — Bilateral agreement on double taxation — Judicial double taxation)
Date: 2016-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: double taxation, nationality of legal persons, profit sharing, residence, shareholder








C_2016136EN.01000301.xml










18.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 136/3





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino — Italy) — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino
(Case C-194/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Direct taxation - Imposition of dividends - Bilateral agreement on double taxation - Judicial double taxation))
(2016/C 136/04)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Véronique Baudinet, Adrien Boyer, Pauline Boyer, Edouard Boyer

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU, 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as the legislation at issue in the main proceedings, under which, when a resident of that Member State, a shareholder in a company established in another Member State, receives from that company dividends taxed in both States, that double taxation is not remedied by the grant in the shareholder’s State of residence of a tax credit at least equal to the amount of tax paid in the State of the source of those dividends.


(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7573 — DMK/DOC Kaas) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: dairy industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2016041EN.01003301.xml










4.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 41/33





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7573 — DMK/DOC Kaas)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 41/05)






1.


On 28 January 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking DMK Deutsches Milchkontor GmbH (‘DMK’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of DOC Kaas BV (‘DOC Kaas’, the Netherlands) by way of conclusion of a swap and purchase agreement.
The same concentration was already notified to the Commission on 5 November 2015, but the notification was subsequently withdrawn on 1 December 2015.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   DMK: develops, produces and distributes a broad range of dairy products including basic milk products, cheese, whey-based products, baby food, ice cream, health products and dairy ingredients for food manufacturing,
—   DOC Kaas: develops, produces and distributes Dutch-type cheese and other types of hard and semi-hard cheese. To a smaller extent, DOC Group also produces and distributes cream and whey-based products.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7573 — DMK/DOC Kaas, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).