do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-170/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Benelli Q.J. v OHIM — Demharter (MOTOBI) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark MOTOBI — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2016098EN.01003001.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/30





Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Benelli Q.J. v OHIM — Demharter (MOTOBI)
(Case T-170/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark MOTOBI - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 098/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Benelli Q.J. Srl (Pesaro, Italy) (represented by: P. Lukácsi and B. Bozóki, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially F. Mattina and subsequently P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Demharter GmbH (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Kohn, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 January 2013 (Case R 2080/2011-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Demharter GmbH and Benelli Q.J. Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Benelli Q.J. Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2016039EN.01000201.xml










2.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

1 February 2016
(2016/C 39/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0884




JPY


Japanese yen


131,99




DKK


Danish krone


7,4625




GBP


Pound sterling


0,76100




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2835




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1096




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4160




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,021




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,86




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3952




RON


Romanian leu


4,5246




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2269




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5377




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5253




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4688




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6820




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5500




KRW


South Korean won


1 310,43




ZAR


South African rand


17,5019




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1605




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6605




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 846,05




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5345




PHP


Philippine peso


51,932




RUB


Russian rouble


82,9655




THB


Thai baht


38,760




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3511




MXN


Mexican peso


19,8811




INR


Indian rupee


73,9100






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council decision on the acceptance of the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (08651/2015 — C8-0158/2015 — 2014/0358(NLE))
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, European Parliament
Subjects: air quality, atmospheric pollutant, international convention, protocol to an agreement, revision of an agreement, transfrontier pollution








C_2018035EN.01015401.xml










31.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/154





P8_TA(2016)0027
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council decision on the acceptance of the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (08651/2015 — C8-0158/2015 — 2014/0358(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 035/31)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (08651/2015),










—


having regard to the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (08651/2015 ADD 1 and ADD 2),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0158/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0001/2016),












1.


Gives its consent to acceptance of the Amendments to the Protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Case T-169/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Benelli Q.J. Srl v OHIM — Demharter (MOTO B) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark MOTO B — Earlier non-registered national figurative marks MOTOBI — Relative ground for refusal — Evidence that the earlier non-registered marks are well known — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 50(1), third subparagraph, of Regulation No 2868/95 — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, road safety, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2016098EN.01002901.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/29





Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Benelli Q.J. Srl v OHIM — Demharter (MOTO B)
(Case T-169/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark MOTO B - Earlier non-registered national figurative marks MOTOBI - Relative ground for refusal - Evidence that the earlier non-registered marks are well known - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose - Failure to take account thereof - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Provision to the contrary - Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rule 50(1), third subparagraph, of Regulation No 2868/95 - First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 098/37)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Benelli Q.J. Srl (Pesaro, Italy) (represented by: P. Lukácsi and B. Bozóki, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially F. Mattina and subsequently P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Demharter GmbH (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Kohn, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 January 2013 (Case R 95/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Benelli Q.J. Srl and Demharter GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Benelli Q.J. Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
Case T-541/14: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris v OHIM — Vicente Gandía Pla (ILLIRIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ILLIRIA — Earlier Community word mark CASTILLO DE LIRIA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_2016098EN.01004001.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/40





Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris v OHIM — Vicente Gandía Pla (ILLIRIA)
(Case T-541/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ILLIRIA - Earlier Community word mark CASTILLO DE LIRIA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 098/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris Srl (Salice Salentino, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo and V. Wellens, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar and H. Kunz, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Vicente Gandía Pla, SA (Chiva, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2014 (Case R 917/2013-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Vicente Gandía Pla, SA and Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Ukraine (11592/2015 — C8-0300/2015 — 2015/0810(CNS))
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Eurojust, Ukraine, cooperation agreement (EU), judicial cooperation, ratification of an agreement








C_2018035EN.01015501.xml










31.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/155





P8_TA(2016)0028
Eurojust and Ukraine Cooperation agreement *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Ukraine (11592/2015 — C8-0300/2015 — 2015/0810(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 035/32)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (11592/2015),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0300/2015),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1), in particular Article 26a(2) thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedures,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0007/2016),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and Eurojust






(1)  OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.
Case T-485/14: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Bon Net v OHIM — Aldi (Bon Appétit!) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Bon Appétit! — Prior national figurative marks Бoн Апемú and Bon Apetí — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016098EN.01003901.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/39





Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Bon Net v OHIM — Aldi (Bon Appétit!)
(Case T-485/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Bon Appétit! - Prior national figurative marks Бoн Апемú and Bon Apetí - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 098/50)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bon Net OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: L, Kolks, C. Fürsen, N. Lützenrath and U. Rademacher, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2014 (Case R 1199/2013-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Bon Net OOD and Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Bon Net OOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.






(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.
Case F-66/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 February 2016 — de Stefano v Commission
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: NATO, indemnification, servant (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_2016098EN.01006301.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/63





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 February 2016 — de Stefano v Commission
(Case F-66/12) (1)

(2016/C 098/82)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 258, 25/8/2012, p. 28.
Case T-171/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Benelli Q.J. v OHIM — Demharter (MOTOBI B PESARO) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community figurative mark MOTOBI B PESARO — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence submitted against the application for revocation after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rule 50(1), third subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2016098EN.01003002.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/30





Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Benelli Q.J. v OHIM — Demharter (MOTOBI B PESARO)
(Case T-171/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community figurative mark MOTOBI B PESARO - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence submitted against the application for revocation after the expiry of the period set for that purpose - Failure to take account thereof - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Provision to the contrary - Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rule 50(1), third subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
(2016/C 098/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Benelli Q.J. Srl (Pesaro, Italy) (represented by: P. Lukácsi and B. Bozóki, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially F. Mattina and subsequently P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Demharter GmbH (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Kohn, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 January 2013 (Case R 2590/2011-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Demharter GmbH and Benelli Q.J. Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Benelli Q.J. Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/12 of 6 January 2016 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China (OJ L 4, 7.1.2016)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, anti-dumping measure, countervailing charge, import (EU), originating product, photovoltaic cell, semi-metal, surveillance concerning imports








L_2016025EN.01006901.xml










2.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 25/69







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/12 of 6 January 2016 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 4 of 7 January 2016
)


On page 8, in recital 64:
for:


                  ‘This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and by Article 25(1) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009,’,

read:


                  ‘The Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and by Article 25(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation did not deliver an opinion,’.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro (11596/2015 — C8-0299/2015 — 2015/0812(CNS)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Eurojust, Montenegro, cooperation agreement (EU), judicial cooperation, ratification of an agreement








C_2018035EN.01015601.xml










31.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/156





P8_TA(2016)0029
Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro (11596/2015 — C8-0299/2015 — 2015/0812(CNS)
(Consultation)
(2018/C 035/33)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (11596/2015),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0299/2015);










—


having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1), in particular Article 26a(2) thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0008/2016),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and Eurojust.






(1)  OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.
Case T-683/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Brammer v OHIM — Office Ernest T. Freylinger (EUROMARKER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark EUROMARKER — Earlier Community word mark EURIMARK — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2016-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016098EN.01003202.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/32





Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Brammer v OHIM — Office Ernest T. Freylinger (EUROMARKER)
(Case T-683/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark EUROMARKER - Earlier Community word mark EURIMARK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 098/42)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Brammer GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: R. Kornfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and H. Kunz, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Office Ernest T. Freylinger SA (Strassen, Luxembourg)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2013 (Case R 1653/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Office Ernest T. Freylinger SA and Brammer GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls, in part, the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 October 2013 (Case R 1653/2012-1) in so far as it was found in that decision that there was a likelihood of confusion as regards the services ‘providing access to database services for searching for the availability and specifications of community trademarks and designs’ in Class 38 covered by the mark applied for;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Brammer GmbH and OHIM to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.