European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2016 on Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No …/… of 25 September 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the specific compositional and information requirements for processed cereal-based food and baby food (C(2015)06507 — 2015/2863(DEA))
Date: 2016-01-20
Institutions: Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, European Parliament
Subjects: baby food, cereal product, consumer information, early childhood, food safety, foodstuff, health risk, marketing standard, nutritional disease, sugar








C_2018011EN.01015201.xml










12.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/152





P8_TA(2016)0015
Objection to a delegated act: specific compositional and information requirements for processed cereal-based food and baby food
European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2016 on Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No …/… of 25 September 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the specific compositional and information requirements for processed cereal-based food and baby food (C(2015)06507 — 2015/2863(DEA))
(2018/C 011/23)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission delegated regulation (C(2015)06507),










—


having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on food intended for infants and young children, food for special medical purposes, and total diet replacement for weight control and repealing Council Directive 92/52/EEC, Commission Directives 96/8/EC, 1999/21/EC, 2006/125/EC and 2006/141/EC, Directive 2009/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 41/2009 and (EC) No 953/2009 (1), and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,










—


having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,










—


having regard to the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes adopted by the World Health Assembly in 1981 (2) and the 16 subsequent relevant World Health Assembly resolutions, in particular resolution WHA63.23 of 21 May 2010, which urges Member States ‘to end inappropriate promotion of food for infants and young children and to ensure that nutrition and health claims shall not be permitted for foods for infants and young children, except where specifically provided for, in relevant Codex Alimentarius standards or national legislation’,










—


having regard to the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) position statement of 24 September 2007 (3),










—


having regard to Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 and the precautionary principle enshrined therein,










—


having regard to the motion for a resolution by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,










—


having regard to Rule 105(3) of its Rules of Procedure,










A.


whereas the Commission has failed to present to Parliament and the Council the report on young-child formula required by Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 (Article 12), which is a necessary condition for national strategies to reduce childhood obesity;










B.


whereas part 3 of Annex I to the delegated regulation allows 30 % of the energy in baby foods to be provided by sugar (7,5 g sugar/100 kcal is equivalent to 30 kcal from sugar in 100 kcal energy);










C.


whereas the provisions contained in part 3 of Annex I are contrary to all health advice from the World Health Organisation (WHO) (4) — which recommends limiting the intake of free sugars to less than 10 % of total energy intake, with a further reduction to less than 5 % of total energy intake for additional health benefits — and from scientific committees in Member States, which have recommended significant reductions in total sugar intake; whereas the introduction of such foods — especially at such an early stage — is likely to contribute to rising levels of childhood obesity and may affect the developing taste preferences of children; whereas, in the case of infants and young children in particular, added sugar levels should be kept to a minimum;










D.


whereas poor diet is now by far the biggest underlying cause of disease and death globally — bigger than tobacco, alcohol and physical inactivity combined (5);










E.


whereas the WHO recommends that, from six months of age, breast milk should be complemented with a variety of adequate, safe and nutrient dense complementary foods, while salt and sugars should not be added to complementary foods (6);










F.


whereas all Member States have endorsed the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes adopted by the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 1981 (‘the International Code’) and the 16 subsequent relevant WHA resolutions;










G.


whereas Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 was adopted before the European Food Safety Authority’s Scientific Opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae of 5 August 2014 (7) was published;










H.


whereas the Union has an obligation to promote high-quality public health principles, standards and legislation in its relations with non-EU countries and international organisations in the field of public health and a duty to establish an effective health protective framework;










I.


whereas infants and young children are a particularly vulnerable population group as regards endocrine disrupting chemicals and other contaminants;










J.


whereas the International Agency for Research on Cancer — the WHO’s specialised cancer agency — classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans on 20 March 2015 (8);












1.


Objects to the Commission delegated regulation;






Obesity










2.


Considers that the delegated regulation does not contain sufficient measures to protect infants and young children against obesity and that the allowed maximum sugar level should be substantially lowered in line with WHO recommendations;






Emerging technologies










3.


Considers that, in line with the precautionary principle, emerging technologies such as GMOs and nanotechnologies, whose long-term risks are not known, should be prohibited in processed cereal-based food and baby food;






Labelling










4.


Takes the view that, in consideration of global public health recommendations, including WHA resolution 63.23, the WHA Global Strategy on Infant and Young Child Feeding and the global impact of exports from the Union to third countries, the labelling and marketing of processed baby foods should make it clear that these products are not adequate for use by infants of less than six months of age and should not undermine the six-month exclusive breastfeeding recommendation; considers, therefore, that the labelling and marketing should be revised in line with WHA recommendations for foods for infants and young children;






Transparency










5.


Considers that, for the sake of transparency and building public trust in Union institutions and EU decision making, the list of ‘bilateral meetings’ (including the dates thereof and participants) which the Commission has held with interested parties during the process of drafting the delegated regulation should be made public;




o
o o








6.


Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and to notify it that the delegated regulation cannot enter into force;












7.


Calls on the Commission to bring forward a new delegated act that takes into consideration the findings of EFSA's review of the compositional requirements of processed cereal-based food, and scientific evidence on the effects of added sugar and the early introduction of processed foods in relation to optimal infant and young child feeding recommendations;












8.


Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.






(1)  OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 35.

(2)  http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/code_english.pdf

(3)  http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140507013106/http://www.sacn.gov.uk/pdfs/position_statement_2007_09_24.pdf

(4)  http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs394/en/

(5)  Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Lancet 2015; 386: 2257–74 Published Online 15 September 2015.

http://thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(15)00195-6.pdf


(6)  http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs394/en/

(7)  http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/scientific_output/files/main_documents/3760.pdf

(8)  http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/MonographVolume112.pdf