do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/83 of 19 January 2016 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Granada Mollar de Elche/Granada de Elche (PDO))
Date: 2016-01-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Community of Valencia, Spain, designation of origin, labelling, pip fruit, product designation








L_2016017EN.01000801.xml










26.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 17/8








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/83
of 19 January 2016
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Granada Mollar de Elche/Granada de Elche (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Granada Mollar de Elche’/‘Granada de Elche’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Granada Mollar de Elche’/‘Granada de Elche’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Granada Mollar de Elche’/‘Granada de Elche’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 January 2016.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 264, 12.8.2015, p. 40.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7884 — Atos/Unify) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-01-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, information technology industry, merger control, telecommunications equipment








C_2016017EN.01000201.xml










19.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 17/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7884 — Atos/Unify)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 17/03)
On 11 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7884. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7477 — Halliburton/Baker Hughes) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2016-01-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, gas industry, merger control, oil industry, provision of services








C_2016017EN.01000101.xml










19.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 17/1





Initiation of proceedings
(Case M.7477 — Halliburton/Baker Hughes)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2016/C 17/01)
On 12 January 2016, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7477 — Halliburton/Baker Hughes, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-21/16: Action brought on 19 January 2016 — Karl Conzelmann v OHIM (LIKE IT)
Date: 2016-01-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cosmetic product, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016098EN.01005502.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/55





Action brought on 19 January 2016 — Karl Conzelmann v OHIM (LIKE IT)
(Case T-21/16)
(2016/C 098/71)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Karl Conzelmann GmbH & Co. KG (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: J. Klink, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘LIKE IT’ — Application No 13 180 104

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 November 2015 in Case R 223/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 7(2) of that regulation.
Case T-409/12: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Mitsubishi Electric v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — New decision taken following annulment in part of the initial decision by the Court — Fines — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Erroneous application — Starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement — Deterrence multiplier)
Date: 2016-01-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, electrical equipment, equal treatment, fine, principle of proportionality, restriction on competition, rights of the defence








C_2016078EN.01001302.xml










29.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/13





Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Mitsubishi Electric v Commission
(Case T-409/12) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in gas insulated switchgear projects - New decision taken following annulment in part of the initial decision by the Court - Fines - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of good administration - Rights of the defence - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Erroneous application - Starting amount - Extent of contribution to the infringement - Deterrence multiplier))
(2016/C 078/21)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mitsubishi Electric Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: R. Denton, J. Vyavaharkar, R. Browne, L. Philippou, M. Roald, and J. Robinson, Solicitors, and K. Haegeman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, principally, for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 4381 of 27 June 2012 amending Decision C(2006) 6762 final of 24 January 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (now Article 101 TFEU) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement to the extent that it was addressed to Mitsubishi Electric Corp. and Toshiba Corp. (Case COMP/39.966 — Gas Insulated Switchgear — Fines) in so far as it concerns the applicant and, in the alternative, for the amendment of Article 1 of that decision with a view to the annulment or, failing that, a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mitsubishi Electric Corp. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 343, 10.11.2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/82 of 19 January 2016 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Asparago di Cantello (PGI))
Date: 2016-01-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Lombardy, designation of origin, fresh product, labelling, perennial vegetable, product designation








L_2016017EN.01000701.xml










26.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 17/7








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/82
of 19 January 2016
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Asparago di Cantello (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Asparago di Cantello’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Asparago di Cantello’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Asparago di Cantello’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 January 2016.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 255, 4.8.2015, p. 7.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).